Because that would just better help scum know who they should be either role blocking or killing. I'm not going to provide them that advantage
Death Stranding Mafia |OT| Bridge the Divides in Society (Via Murder)
- Thread starter Natiko
- Start date
Because that would just better help scum know who they should be either role blocking or killing. I'm not going to provide them that advantage
Ding ding ding.
Claims are for tomorrow. Claiming now won't guarantee a change in votes, it will give Scum more power to choose who to NK tonight and make lylo more effective for them.
"scum votes were probably locked, only town moved AND US but we were doing this."
You tried to compare your votes to that of confirmed town (turm, mao).
Btw I would change my vote to Gorlak but if I'm right he's throwing himself on a grenade right now to save Monkey and that's interesting. Anyway. I'm goin' to bed.
You're almost dead though? 4/6 votes. If you are town your claim could prevent losing town today.
I don't know Monkey's aligment. Why would I be OK to have my aligment related to hers?
Because your first post after Monkey redchecked Maol was talking about misdirections and how that could have been affected by other roles. That's a weird take to do on a red check unless you know that the check was wrong.
Again, my trouble is not that you were questioning the check. It's that your first instinct was to doubt the check and say that it was affected by some other role. And then you said that you wanted to lynch Monkey if Maol flipped town. Which is weird because you said plenty of times that the check could have been compromised.
I don't get this. So if you are town I'm town?
Because the first reaction for a red check usually isn't doubting it. No scum would trade 1vs1 so doubting a red check makes me think that the player already knew that the check was wrong.
He did. He voted for Maol saying that we needed to solve him. And then lynch Monkey if he flipped town.
I'm going to be 100% honest. I have very disinterested in the game. I have seen the posts but every time that I sit down to read them and reply I just don't care much. I just saw that big post from Fat4all and all the post after it and reading throught all of it was a drag and I wasn't even going to answer. Maybe it's because I had a lot of trouble trying to understand the game or because my reads so far were shit, I don't know. I just know that I'm not putting the usual work that I do. I know that I should ask for a replacement instead of taking a spot, and I was very close to doing it, but I won't be able to play much the rest of the season as I reviewed one of the following games and I'm running one too.
Because I voted Maol not because of your red check but because of his own claim.
Not even close.
I have been saying this for a while.
You and me.
I like to think there's still a chance I won't be lynched, without having to reveal
Can you give me a quote?
That's not how this works Fran, who outside of yourself?
What do you think about meatwad not wanting to claim?
We'll see but I don't trust Gorlak's line of questioning here. People who try to force claims typically have agendas and not good ones
Fando D2 was mostly him being unsure about everything. He wasn't sure about the red check (and said that we should lunch Monkey if Maol flips town). Then he was unsure about the claim but never questioned it. And ended with a forced town read on Maol at the end, something that scum always knew.
Malus, Kopite maybe. Zeke was another possibility but he isn't voting now and when asked for a vote he just avoided it, so I'm not feeling too good about that.
That it's bullshit.
We are in a stalemate. The votes aren't changing and you've been the vote leader since the original day end.
To put it in other words you are waiting for something to magically happen and make the suspicion go away. This is reactionary and scummy. You aren't even voting right now.
What I was trying to say was that there was no scum voting activity for quite a period of time there. The ones to break that stalemate were confirmed town plus you and it settled again on a tie between town. Me and Fran breaking that tie again came some time later and was ultimately a switch from town to town and so isn't indicative of anything.
That the three way stalemate lasted as long as it did tells me that scum wasn't going to move either way and was content where they were.
Fine it's literally going to make no difference because nobody will believe me anyway but I'm Amelie the Hider. I can hide behind people at night and avoid being NK, unless I hide behind scum or somebody targeted for the NK.
Uhm, I can see scum doing that. I've seen scum do that. Also let's not forget monkey opened up day 2 with the red check. So pushing hard on that day doesn't really amount to anything. So idk why you are giving him"town credit" for that day. Fran also nvr votes on mao.
Post #1084 is a long readlist from him, do you feel the same uncertainty here as well? Because I don't.
Yeah, Zeke not voting makes me side-eye him.
Night 1 Fantomas
Night 2 Fran
I should clarify that it's not a scum detecting role, because hiding behind scum only means I'm still vulnerable to being NK by scum.
It might help to tell us who you are going to hide behind tonight. It would be pertinent information if it wound up scum and you got NK'd. Could help us solve the game. Only value Town's getting out of this power now that it:s been revealed.
Let's review that list:
Kitsune: town read.
Maol: town read.
Malus: town read.
Fat4all: town read.
Kalor: Unsure.
VA: Blind spot.
Kopite: Null.
Meatwad: Scum lean.
Monkey: town read.
Gorlak: town read.
Fanto: town read.
The only scum lean that Fando has is Meatwad. Everyone else is either town read or a null. How is that taking a stance about anything?
Ok. I'm a commuter and I wasn't targeteable yesterday.
Could he hide behind me if I was commuting? Wouldn't he receive a notification that his action failed?
How does that help town in any way? It only gives scum a target to get 2 kills.
I missed this. This sounds like bullshit. This is not how hiders work.
I don't know if that's the case? Did Meatwad say anything about both targets being killed if they were targeted or just one? Is that an assumption on your part because if it was stated outright I missed it and if I missed it then yeah you're right.
Here is the thing about that. If I hide behind somebody and that person is NK, then I die as well. Also if I just happened to announce my intention here to hide behind scum well then they wouldn't be dumb enough to attempt to NK me. So that plan likely won't work
So if I got this right.
Meat can hide behind someone.
If that person is targeted by a nk, he dies with them.
If that person is scum: he doesn't die, but is targetable?
Meat can hide behind someone.
If that person is targeted by a nk, he dies with them.
If that person is scum: he doesn't die, but is targetable?
Aha, okay, that's a good clarification to have. Thanks for that.
It is literally how my version of the role works or do I need to quote you my role PM?
Remember this is a bastard game
He said he couldn't avoid the NK if the person he hides behind is the NK. How is that not clear what it means?
When I hide behind scum I'm still vulnerable to potentially be killed. The logic I'm sure being, I'm trying to hide behind my would be killers, they're just going to turn around and kill me
What else would it mean? If his hiding target is the NK he can't also be the NK.
Forgot for a sec we were so close to majority, didn't want anyone to snipe
Don't play mafia while tired folks
Don't play mafia while tired folks