The best content was created by teams Activision contracted. So maybe. The game has gotten more gross with its micro transactions since the split.
They didn't create the raids.
The best content was created by teams Activision contracted. So maybe. The game has gotten more gross with its micro transactions since the split.
THISSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Publishers set targets, devs figure out how to hit them.
"But don't devs have to implement crazy monetization to hit crazy targets?"
Yes, but these targets are generated by the dev pitch in the first place.
Nowadays you don't just pitch gameplay, you pitch how it's going to make money too. 90% of the time it's on the dev.
I want to Destiny to be the best it can be. Is that too much to ask?
They signed that death warrant when they cut ties with Microsoft.
Er...about what you feel about Destiny? Or just in general?
Not that I agree with the OP's general point, but Activision has a ton of in-house developers. If push came to shove they could probably farm out Destiny to some of them and continue it on as their own. Not that the results would be great.
They just don't agree with you.
Even if they only give you a certain peroid on time? I imagine they'd do something like " you can grind it for a week or else you can buy it". You'd really be ok with that? Because that is how they would do it because they want you to buy it because they make more money that way.
Edit: I take that back. They would just annualize the game. So if you wanted the upgrade with all of the cool new loot $60 please. Are you sure you want that?
Daft response.Here's DMG's reponse regarding Nightfalls loot/Eververse:
They claim that time and resources are the biggest issues they face right now, so they have to make some choices.
I don't buy that for even a single second especially when they put time and resources into Eververse. If its really that bad as it seem, maybe having Activision's backing would get them to make the earnable cosmetics/unique loot
What is the actual poll question supposed to be?
anyway the graphics in Destiny are pretty behind the times so I don't know who's fault that is but that company shouldn't have Destiny
Season of the outlaw was Forsaken.High Moon was behind Black Armory and VV Warmind/Season of Opulence
Season of the Outlaw was Bungie and it's considered the worst, Opulence (VV) as the best.
The best content was created by teams Activision contracted. So maybe. The game has gotten more gross with its micro transactions since the split.
uh oh, Season of the Drifter then? My bad.Season of the outlaw was Forsaken.
Seriously, a little effort you guys.
With the overabundance of themed cosmetics in Eververse, lack of Vendor Refresh, and reskinned cosmetics that are earn-able from activities, it shows that Bungie lacks the the vision and drive to make Destiny the best where it can be. The fact they refresh Eververse on a seaonal basis far far more than vendor refresh is rather telling
They signed that death warrant when they cut ties with Microsoft.
Activision jumped ship from the second highest selling shooter IP? https://www.playstationlifestyle.ne...he-2nd-best-selling-fps-franchise-in-the-u-s/Would have been better if it launched as a F2P title when Destiny was announced. From the outset, neither Bungie or Activision really knew what they had made, hence the so-so MMO-lite stuff in the game. They never really committed to one or the other and all the troubles that came after launch were a massive red flat for those watching the steady demise of Bungie.
D2 seems to have finally moved in a good direction but for many it was a bit too late. Activision probably also saw this and jumped ship, leaving Bungie to flounder and seek new funding/support.
Ultimately it's better in Bungies hands since they can direct where they like it but it could also lead to its death if they cannot get support for such a big project.
anyway the graphics in Destiny are pretty behind the times so I don't know who's fault that is but that company shouldn't have Destiny
Umm yeah? Do you think getting raid armor with trash perks was better than this system? Sure elemental affinity is a hassle but its not like that cant be improved upon going forward. Not even sure what makes you think being with Activision would have prevented any of this.But most importantly, did anyone really ask for Armor 2.0? Did anyone honestly thought to themselves "Man, it would be great if I can get the same armor with different elemental affinities with frivolous stats and enhance them with mods" and thought it would make the game better?
What is the actual poll question supposed to be?
anyway the graphics in Destiny are pretty behind the times so I don't know who's fault that is but that company shouldn't have Destiny