Like, maybe take a breather and read my posts again?
Lmfao it's the same logic that makes the aggregated user-review score useless as a means to gauge the quality of a game.
Game quality doesn't stay stagnant. Standards get higher with time. If the exact same game exists from last year for way cheaper and newer versions of soccer with improvements exist this year, a game that was a 71% last year isn't magically a 71% this year.
Reviews don't exist in vacuum. If a game offers a terrible value, it's not entitled to a good score. People are paying money for it.