yep I know the exact scene. The de-aging looks a lot better as the movie goes on.. but that very first scene of young Deniro and Pesci is shocking. It literally looked like a next gen game.
I feel very stupid for asking this but did
russell tell frank to kill jimmy when he told him to take the plane to detroit or was there something else going on?
I think I completely misunderstand the mob lingo
also, what phone call was frank talking about at the end?
But I suppose Buffalino felt it important that Sheeran do it himself, hence arranging for him to fly to Detroit and be at the meeting.
That's an interesting take on the plot structure. The meandering nature of the narrative was a plus for me. And that final shot...A perfect film. It slows down as it goes on, you feel tired, you feel the aging. It forces you to ruminate. I loved this and can't wait to see it again.
Just a though, did DeNiro want the door left open just a crack at the end because that's how Hoffa left his door when they stayed together at the hotel, earlier in the film? Seems kind of like a little, tiny hint that Hoffa had an influence and lasting effect on DeNiro, as much as his cold-faced soldier-attitude wouldn't show it.
Yeah, that was my interpretation of that as well. It seemed to me like Scorsese wanted to emphasize it in that scene where Hoffa leaves his door open, because Frank sort of stares at it for a few seconds before going to bed.
The fear of the deaging was really overblown, outside of the eyes a few moments, was really solid, didn't distract me at all.
It's silly to dismiss the criticism as hyperbole. For some people, it really was distracting.YEP!
People are stupid. Internet critics are always looking for that headline-grabbing hyperbole. Both my wife and I thought the film was outstanding and the visual effects were not an issue. They did a damn good job, and there's one scene with Pesci in particular that is absolutely uncanny, it looks so real.
Watched Goodfellas again recently and holy shit there's a new Sopranos character every 2 minutes.I have one problem with this movie. I keep pausing it whenever I see someone familiar to see if they were on the Sopranos.
Watched Goodfellas again recently and holy shit there's a new Sopranos character every 2 minutes.
I have one problem with this movie. I keep pausing it whenever I see someone familiar to see if they were on the Sopranos.
It's silly to dismiss the criticism as hyperbole. For some people, it really was distracting.
Eh. I wouldn't compare this to Once Upon a Time in America. Apart from taking place over decades and starting DeNiro, it's a very different sort of film.It feels like almost no one here has seen Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in America, given that the comparison between that and Scorsese's movie positively screams out to be made. Just not a favorite among ERA's gangster film connoisseurs?
I took Charlie's instructions to drive around with the dead fish in his car as a cover for the potential odor Hoffa's corpse would leave behind in the car after transporting it.
I'm going to bet a whole lot of people in this thread seen Once Upon a Time in America. I think it's more likely that people just don't see the connection that you see. For example, I have seen Once Upon a Time in America and I don't see any special connection between the movies that must be commented on. You can draw comparisons I'm sure, you can do it with many movies, but I think it's more useful to articulate it than to assume that anyone who doesn't have the same theory as you must have not seen the film.It feels like almost no one here has seen Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in America, given that the comparison between that and Scorsese's movie positively screams out to be made, and yet has remained largely unremarked upon. Just not a favorite among ERA's gangster film connoisseurs?
Eh. I wouldn't compare this to Once Upon a Time in America. Apart from taking place over decades and starting DeNiro, it's a very different sort of film.
I'm going to bet a whole lot of people in this thread seen Once Upon a Time in America. I think it's more likely that people just don't see the connection that you see. For example, I have seen Once Upon a Time in America and I don't see any special connection between the movies that must be commented on. You can draw comparisons I'm sure, you can do it with many movies, but I think it's more useful to articulate it than to assume that anyone who doesn't have the same theory as you must have not seen the film.
That seems like a pretty surface level comparison to me and I'm not sure it provides much insight about either films, at least not when presented in this abridged version.They're also both elegiac, sprawling 3+ hour long films, made by geriatric filmmakers exploring their own legacies, about fading gangsters looking back on their desolate criminal lives with regret. Heavens' sake, OUaTiA features an effects-aged De Niro reflecting on his past, and even includes his visit to a crypt. Actually, the parallels are very prominent.
I also elaborate on this comparison a bit more in the "official" Irishman reviews thread.