The ghosts were always like the least-important part of those movies. Yeah there's a plot, but it's really about the characters and watching them interact.I guess it's just a boring route to go.
And literally has been done 3 times now.
This is the case.
But people are too stupid to realize it so the next trailer will have to give away all the jokes and ghosts.
Why doesn't this first trailer have tons and tons of jokes and oneliners like the original movie? I mean, the trailer needs to be representative of that! This is all serious, all doomsday and very few ghosts too.
Oh...
The ghosts were always like the least-important part of those movies. Yeah there's a plot, but it's really about the characters and watching them interact.
Each movie, there's like one sequence where they use their proton packs, some montage of them running around to music, and them fighting some baddie at the end. These aren't action movies. They're not about the complex lore of unraveling the mysteries of Ivo Shandor. It's some quirky characters being glib about the weird shit they surround themselves with, and occasionally some ominous music plays.
A first trailer is the first impression you get a movie. This leaves the impression that it's stranger things with a ghost busters crossover episode.This is the case.
But people are too stupid to realize it so the next trailer will have to give away all the jokes and ghosts.
Who is "folk"? It's written and directed by Jason Reitman, son of the director (and co-writer) of Ghostbusters.that aint ghostbusters. just make it its own damn thing.
love how folk over at sony went yeah haha that stranger things thing is massively popular lets do that and then slap ghostbusters on it xD
fuck outta here
Ok.
So now I'm even less interested because I am not really wanting nerdy teens hang out and fight ghosts with their teacher sometimes
They should have really old men (and one dead guy) dress in their too-small old uniforms and amble around sadly. That's a thing they should do in 2020.For God's sake, is it really that hard to make Ghostbusters 3 with the original cast (aside from Harold Raimis) instead of taking it in a completely different direction?
Man, imagine if we missed out on paul rudd coming back as Tommy in Halloween just for that.I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
I don't think so. That makes next to zero sense. I suppose anything could happen, but that would be a disservice to Rudd, as I think he could be an actual ghostbuster and would fit into that role.I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
Watch the villain be a grown-up Oscar.I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
I don't think so. That makes next to zero sense. I suppose anything could happen, but that would be a disservice to Rudd, as I think he could be an actual ghostbuster and would fit into that role.
who knows.
I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
Ah yes, if you wanted a sequel to a movie starring adults to also star adults, you're a "manbaby"
For God's sake, is it really that hard to make Ghostbusters 3 with the original cast (aside from Harold Raimis) instead of taking it in a completely different direction?
That or he and Carrie Coon get possessed as the new keymaster/gatekeeper and Gozer ensues.I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
Yes.
If they're going to continue the GB franchise, they need to pass the torch, dude. The original cast of Ghostbusters are pushing 70 years of age. Even if GB was real life, they would have all retired, unless they were hard up on cash (which would probably be likely, considering how much they trash the city fighting ghosts).
That or he and Carrie Coon get possessed as the new keymaster/gatekeeper and Gozer ensues.
C'mon man, you know exactly the sort of toxic misogynsts that had a fit over the 2016 film that I'm referring to.
Was the original any different? It was pitched more as a lighthearted horror movie (if such a thing exists), whereas 2016's Answer the Call was going way more for goofy humor, and that was apparent even in the trailers.A bit concerned that there is very little in the way of comedy both in the trailer and on everything else (media interviews, leaks) so far.
Exactly. They had an opportunity in the early 2000s to do a "one last ride" film with the aged Busters when Ramis was still alive but they were still young(ish), and Bill Murray torpedoed it by being a dickhead. That opportunity is gone now. The series either has to move on or fade away, and Sony isn't going to let it fade away.
whoa, yeah i can totally see that being a twisty storyline they might use. i dig it.I think he's a Ghostbuster fanboy who's upset that the Busters retired and there's no more ghosts around to catch, so he orchestrates things behind the scenes to start letting ghosts out again.
The fact he instantly recognizes the tech beyond just 'oh cool that's stuff I saw on TV when I was a kid' is important.
Was the original any different? It was pitched more as a lighthearted horror movie (if such a thing exists), whereas 2016's Answer the Call was going way more for goofy humor, and that was apparent even in the trailers.
I'm sure it will be, it's just weird they chose to release the most generic possible trailer as their first trailer especially if it ends up not being representative of the tone of the film.It has paul rudd and people are worried that it wont be a comedic movie? Come on this is just a first trailer....
I really liked it, 100% in!
Just chiming in on this idea: I have 0 interest in this twist and would be immensely disappointed. Hell, there's no reason why Rudd can't be their Ray, last one of the kids actually be the Egon, but Rudd being enthusiastic enough (and knowing enough about it) to be a helpful (and sometimes hurtful) driving force.I'm pretty damn certain that Paul Rudd is the main villain of the movie and he's manipulating the kids into using Grandpa Egon's tech for some nefarious purpose.
My only problem with the 2016 movie is that it wasn't a continuation but almost a redo. The humor was hit or miss. It was fine, though. more comedy than horror. while the original movies deftly weaved both. "Dumpster Fire", "Garbage", and "Trash" always seemed like a huge overreaction meant to get under the skin of the creators involved. It was a great attempt under impossible odds. That's why I really like this new take in the. Ew trailer. It feels different but familiar. Anyone who has seen Evolution knows the potential that he new film has...
Just chiming in on this idea: I have 0 interest in this twist and would be immensely disappointed. Hell, there's no reason why Rudd can't be their Ray, last one of the kids actually be the Egon, but Rudd being enthusiastic enough (and knowing enough about it) to be a helpful (and sometimes hurtful) driving force.
Regardless of what it was pitched at, it didn't end up like that.Was the original any different? It was pitched more as a lighthearted horror movie (if such a thing exists), whereas 2016's Answer the Call was going way more for goofy humor, and that was apparent even in the trailers.