Numerous things seem ''off'' to me:
- The Core M3 7Y30 is a 4.5 watt chip, using 7 watts under full load. How on earth did this change to a ''15 watt'' one? Unless you are counting everything outside the SoC aswell..
- My guess is that this user looked at this bit: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-m3-7Y30-Notebook-Processor.178426.0.html, specifically this:
- And extrapolated that to the 7Y30 being a 15 watt CPU - Which it isnt.
- ''USD Card?'' I reckon its USB.
- 2x 4900mAh batteries sounds good on paper, but also adds another variable in terms of stability. If one of them dies, then what? And couldnt a 10.000 mAh battery be installed? After all, The Outikel K10000 phablet has one, and its SoC should be of similar wattages as the Core M3 7Y30.
- Fans from 2000-10.000 RPM. Isnt that going to be exceptionally noisy?
I can find the rest of the specs plausible, but these stick out, especially since the initial specs were a lot more realistic in nature.
This also looks strange. Over 80 FPS in Overwatch? At which resolution and with which settings?
By comparison, A Core i5-7Y54, but with the same HD Graphics 615 scores 28.2 fps on 720p on low settings:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-615.174029.0.html
Same goes for GTA V. At what is this run? I wont deny that the HD Graphics 615 is a significant step up from the HD 405, but these metrics lack a lot of detail, and especially in the case of Overwatch and GTA V are just suspicious. I need more details.
You shouldn't be impressed because the facts on the CPU of what we know dont stack up against this new information. Dual batteries to me only means more risk of failure of one of them, so why not take a single large one?
To be fair, GPD Win 1 did do Overwatch aswell and could hit 30 fps.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpdwin/comments/6t9xr8/if_you_guys_wanted_to_play_overwatch_on_the/
The ''sweet'' spot for PS360 titles to run at similar performance as PS360 is actually qHD, so 960x544.