But you have to admit that the cost disparity is frustrating, right?
But with games like MTG is you can directly buy singles and build a deck that way. It's not exclusively RNG packs.Not sure what you mean exactly since I don't find the 3 releases per year frustrating, I find them reinvigorating. I'd be bummed out if I had to play another month of KFT meta. Card games are best when new cards are released. People complained about rotations taking away their cards. I, and many others, loved the idea because change in card games is great. You mainly play wild so I guess you weren't a fan of that change? I'm the opposite, I want change. I still play wild, and do fairly well, the competition there feels dismal compared to standard and that difference brings me back on occasion.
This is pretty typical for a competitive game that has been out for 4 years with as much post release content it has received. Try jumping into MTG which has decades of history. OTOH it's not like you must buy 50 dollars of every expansion and this idea that you need to spend a ton of time to keep up... well, I don't and I think I am continuing to do fine tbh. The standard change helps, but I'd imagine they're thinking up further ways to improve the new player experience.
But with games like MTG is you can directly buy singles and build a deck that way. It's not exclusively RNG packs.
They are yeah, but they give you an option to buy singles and that's important for beginners. Just because a person is a beginner doesn't mean he/she is not willing to dish out some money.
and hearthstone does a very similar thing. i dunno what we're arguing about now lol.They are yeah, but they give you an option to buy singles and that's important for beginners. Just because a person is a beginner doesn't mean he/she is not willing to dish out some money.
If you're talking about dust it takes way more money to gather that dust and build a nice 7-9K dust deck than it does outright paying for a meta deck.and hearthstone does a very similar thing. i dunno what we're arguing about now lol.
I'm talking about money. Double class legendaries and 3 sets per year has driven the cost of maintaining your set up significantly.Not sure what you mean exactly since I don't find the 3 releases per year frustrating, I find them reinvigorating. I'd be bummed out if I had to play another month of KFT meta. Card games are best when new cards are released. People complained about rotations taking away their cards. I, and many others, loved the idea because change in card games is great. You mainly play wild so I guess you weren't a fan of that change? I'm the opposite, I want change. I still play wild, and do fairly well, the competition there feels dismal compared to standard and that difference brings me back on occasion.
Rogue is always fun but if you want to win I'd go Druid.So uhhh... who are the best in the arena right now?
I just went 5-3 on my first run with a mage, then 6-3 with a paladin. Now my third is a choice between Rogue, Druid, and Shaman -.-
Let's do it!!!
Good luck m8 seems like you can hold your own
rogue is super good. play the tempo game and win hard. especially if you get vilespine and scalebane.So uhhh... who are the best in the arena right now?
I just went 5-3 on my first run with a mage, then 6-3 with a paladin. Now my third is a choice between Rogue, Druid, and Shaman -.-
I don't understand why spell only hunter is so popular. The spellstone is how they win most of their games anyhow, and that can be done even better if you at least play Cloaked Huntress.
That's weird, usually I don't notice the community largely caring about that sort of thing, at least when it comes to the absolute most popular decks.Because spell hunter is a fun deck and different I think. And I imagine a lot of people got the hunter weapon for their free one.
I loved this game up until K&C
They keep moving in a direction the fan base doesn't want it to move in. It's 2017 and we're still giving Priest OP cards, while outright ignoring Hunter.
I'm surprised. Still wont be touching the game as it doesn't appeal to me and my money management anymore.Hunter is currently the highest winrate class on https://hsreplay.net/#live-data
makes no sense to me I've only won agains hunter unless they nutdrew me w/ cat trick, secret, ac, spellstone or something of the sort.Hunter is currently the highest winrate class on https://hsreplay.net/#live-data
the shifting powerlevel to epics seems like a much more price driving in that regard. Course you can't play shit like the big decks cause they require so many legendaries but those are mostly neutral. The added class legendaries have been mostly crap, as in a class rarely got 2 good ones in a set. Meanwhile on the epic front every set keeps introducing new must play epics.I'm talking about money. Double class legendaries and 3 sets per year has driven the cost of maintaining your set up significantly.
everyone is experimenting a lot right now so win rates don't mean much
Their "I win question mark" combo is much worse when there's a lot of board wipe decks out there.Yeah but there's one thing we can all agree on.
Shaman is terrible....again.
So quest priest is essentially never going to be viable since N'zoth rotates out next expansion.
I think you can have decent fun with quest priest now using that 3 mana summon two deathrattles card.
Weeeeelp, I went with druid. Started off 0-2 but finished 3-3, so meh could have been worse haha.rogue is super good. play the tempo game and win hard. especially if you get vilespine and scalebane.
I wonder how Razakus priest changes with this expansion.
Psychic Scream is a given. Gilded Gargoyle is probably pretty good. Legendary Weapon a very slight maybe.
Is Dragon or Resurrect upgraded enough to justify a package of its own in it?
Thats Corridor Creeper
That's interesting.Thats Corridor Creeper
I saw it in 90% of deck in several tourney stream
its gonna get nerfed pretty quick
Dude, Dragon's Fury is like...busted a shit lol. I'm loving big spell Mage.
And yeah, Corridor Creeper is pretty nuts. I think I gave it a 3 and then upped it to a 4 during Blizzard's review stream. I think it's a really good card. Unfortunately it looks like it's going to be a really good aggro card.
Edit: Instantly queued into a scumbag Quest Mage to ruin my fun. Oh Ice Block, you can't go soon enough.
That's why I play it in a deck with only 7-mana spells! I've only summoned 1/1 Lysanna once. ;_;