It always happens from at least a few people everytime this has come up in some way. It's always just as unbelievable.Some of you are really choosing pedophilia as the hill to die on. Christ
It always happens from at least a few people everytime this has come up in some way. It's always just as unbelievable.Some of you are really choosing pedophilia as the hill to die on. Christ
I spotted at least one 17 year old.He's following a lot of 18 year olds. Not sure if he's a pedo, but he appears to be on the road to predator.
Oh fuck of with that. Marrying a 16 year old is weird as fuck. And I'm an European who couldn't care less what laws the US has.
I never said it was normal or somehow not creepy, of course it's fucking creepy.Age of consent here in Peru is 14 (or 16, I think it was raised), but I sure ain't getting anywhere near a girl that age because I'm 29 and that'd be creepy as fuck.
I'm learning more and more lately that to some people, using words outside their dictionary definition breaks their brain and they have to correct it. I have a friend like that and he makes a big deal about everything and often looks like he defends pedophiles and rapists because he gets into the "well technically" thing. He is legit a good dude but it just triggers something in him and he can't not correct people.It always happens from at least a few people everytime this has come up in some way. It's always just as unbelievable.
Jesus christ.
Don't worry, as others have pointed out, if they wait until she's 18 before marriage that makes it a-ok.
Arguing the age of consent really, truly, is missing the point.What the fuck, that's not what pedophilia is at all. They were like 16-17 when he married them, which is above the age of consent in most European countries. Great research, way to derail your own thread.
What a lot of people don't realize is like, if someone is going after girls or dating girls right past the age of consent, things usually started before that and the girls were groomed.Arguing the age of consent really, truly, is missing the point.
He got you. He got you all.
I'm pretty sure he's referring to "Kelly Capcom" as his gf. He's been talking at and to "her" all day.
He just retweeted his original post about this whole thing because it's getting so many responses. The guy is fucking with you. 100%.
Some of you are really choosing pedophilia as the hill to die on. Christ
The help that pedophiles need should not be a taboo subject. Pedophilia is a mental illness. Just because it makes you feel icky and gross does not mean we should not be reaching out to help these individuals. Pedophilia is also not necessarily the same as sexual abusers. There are tons of sexual abusers who are not pedophiles, and vice versa.
As someone who feels strongly about criminal reform and mental health care it bothers me that people pick and choose who they are OK with treating humanely. Especially when it comes to mental health.
I believe in deterrence but uh, this dude is joking about minors. Not the same thing.
Hence my question.Am I overlooking something?
Pedophile because he was a with a 22 year old?
Seriously, this entire line of argument is fucking disgusting and incredibly harmful.Arguing the age of consent really, truly, is missing the point.
He has the same Twitter persona as Hideki Kamiya, always super edgy and angry. Where does this come from?
Absolutely but you'll get tons of people here defending these kinds of jokes. People fall over themselves to defend creeps like Seinfeld and that woman who dated Harry Styles when he was 17 tooIf that's a joke, it's a horrible joke that shouldn't be a laughing matter. It's just gross.
He got you. He got you all.
I'm pretty sure he's referring to "Kelly Capcom" as his gf. He's been talking at and to "her" all day.
He just retweeted his original post about this whole thing because it's getting so many responses. The guy is fucking with you. 100%.
I mean, pretending to be a pedophile is disgusting too. Who the hell does that. He "got" no one but himself.
Yea...joking about pedophilia is so damn hilarious. I'm literally rolling around laughing.He got you. He got you all.
I'm pretty sure he's referring to "Kelly Capcom" as his gf. He's been talking at and to "her" all day.
He just retweeted his original post about this whole thing because it's getting so many responses. The guy is fucking with you. 100%.
What the fuck, that's not what pedophilia is at all. They were like 16-17 when he married them, which is above the age of consent in most European countries. Great research, way to derail your own thread.
You'll probably get banned for that my dude. Only American laws matter when it comes to these topics because reasons.
I figured the "Chaplin was a pedophile." quote is because of this?
Am I overlooking something?
Pedophile because he was a with a 22 year old?
Well, both girls were American and the sexual relationships took place in California where age of consent has been 18 since 1913.
This isn't about Joan Barry. OP was talking about Mildred Harris and Lita Grey who were 15/16 at the time of their sexual relationships with Chaplin.
The 16-year-old Harris met actor Charlie Chaplin in mid-1918, dated, and came to believe she was pregnant by him, but the pregnancy was found to be a false alarm. They married privately on October 23, 1918, in Los Angeles. She subsequently did become pregnant.[3]
At the age of 15, she met Chaplin again when she heard he was testing brunettes for his The Gold Rush.[4] They had an affair and she suspected she had become pregnant by the then-35-year-old Chaplin. As he could have been imprisoned for having sexual relations with a minor, they married that November in secret in Empalme, Sonora, Mexico to avoid a scandal. They had two sons, Charles Chaplin Jr. and Sydney Chaplin.
Yeah, history is a really fascinating subject when it comes to legal practices. That's why I'm just curious about all of this.It's weird damn it, some of those girls were 17 just some months ago, it doesn't make it ok for a 40 year old to be drooling over them.
delete12345 said:Does the age of consent laws apply to married couples if the spouse is under the age of 18, at the time in 1918? Just curious.
Maybe by this point, Chaplin is barely pushing it, but because they all got married, age of consent laws might not have applied, and therefore at the time, in both cases, it is considered legal.
I see.Doesn't matter in these cases since the sexual relationships took place after 1918 and before they were married.