I sure hope mods reached out to those erroneously banned with an apology. Especially for those who used their experiences as trans to support their opinion.
OT: Clinton's opinion is still shit.
OT: Clinton's opinion is still shit.
I sure hope mods reached out to those erroneously banned with an apology. Especially for those who used their experiences as trans to support their opinion.
OT: Clinton's opinion is still shit.
A British Shorthair and a Maine Coon are both cats, but they're not the same type of cat.
Likewise cis women and trans women are both women, and they're both as much a woman as one another, but there's obviously a delineation.
In a Hosptial it can be important to delineate, but that's on your medical record, so they're still a Woman to everyone, but with a note on your medical records, like everyone else.
When you challenge someone's entire existence in the first place you deserved to be called for it and we should probably do more to be understanding to those people than act like absolute decorum to the rules comes before the questioning of one's existence.Telling people to "shut the fuck up" and calling them "assholes" violates forum rules no matter how you slice it. I thought the bans were fair.
And yes, Clinton is still shit.
We are not different types of women. We are the same type of women - women, period - who differ in sex-characteristic traits that have nothing to do with our gender identity.
I think most here acknowledge trans women are women, but reducing the cis-trans distinction to mere checkbox on one's medical record ignores the unique issues and challenges both groups face (e.g., trans women are disproportionately affected by sexual violence, cis women are disproportionately affected by restrictions on reproductive rights, etc.). In a perfect world, I agree that there should be no need for further delineation from a public standpoint, however, for the purposes of tackling these challenges in our decidedly imperfect world, the distinction still seems pragmatic, and not any more controversial than intersectional distinctions between the experiences of white women and women of color, or between women born into wealth and women born into poverty. We should be able to acknowledge these subsets of the female experience and the unique challenges they entail without sacrificing solidarity.Delineation does nothing but distract from important things, or enable segregation/bigotry.
Are CIS-Women, Women? Yes. Are Trans-Women, Women? Yes.
So, in terms of terms(Outside of a hospital), Women are Women, and there's no need to delineate it any further.
I mean, there are clearly areas of difference that just can't be ignored.We are not different types of men and women. We are men and women. I'm not understanding what you're trying to say.
I mean, there are clearly areas of difference that just can't be ignored.
Okay, I'll play along. Like what?I mean, there are clearly areas of difference that just can't be ignored.
I mean, there are clearly areas of difference that just can't be ignored.
I think we're going to disagree on what constitutes bigotry. You're basically saying that unless people fall in line and do as you say, they are bigoted and somehow causing you actual harm.
For what it's worth, most of those mods are probably not mods anymore depending on how far back we're talking.
This post really got under my skin. I do believe that shouting at people to fuck off is unproductive, but understand that first off, that you're callously telling my girlfriend that she just doesn't understand the bigotry that she faces every fucking day.
Additionally, I was a mod for almost two years here and spent an unbelievable amount of time dealing with people here who don't think I'm a woman and would prefer I never post here again. To see you basically post "good riddance!" hurts, which I'm sure is what you wanted. I give up, you won.
I didn't say that. I said there are differences a cisgender woman and transgender woman do have differences that will lead to different lives and it's foolish to not accept that. I you can be 100% accepting of transgender issues and identity but those differences still exist. It often feels like bringing up those differences is treated like it's trying to "other" them. I get that is done, but that isn't what is meant here.Some women are born with dicks. Their genitalia has literally *nothing* to do with the fact that they're women.
For sure, I realized that after the response to mine. The main point of my post is that separating people into different categories does nothing but give people somewhere they can point to when someone calls them out on discrimination.The way your post was written implied that inside a hospital trans women aren't women (for medical reasons). Even here you say that trans women are women to everyone, except for on their medical records.
That framing places trans women as women (with exceptions) instead of as women.
I have no doubt that you don't mean any harm and it's just awkward phrasing, but it is mildly abrasive all the same. especially in an already heated thread.
I didn't say that. I said there are differences a cisgender woman and transgender woman do have differences that will lead to different lives and it's foolish to not accept that. I you can be 100% accepting of transgender issues and identity but those differences still exist. It often feels like bringing up those differences is treated like it's trying to "other" them. I get that is done, but that isn't what is meant here.
I didn't say that. I said there are differences a cisgender woman and transgender woman do have differences that will lead to different lives and it's foolish to not accept that. I you can be 100% accepting of transgender issues and identity but those differences still exist. It often feels like bringing up those differences is treated like it's trying to "other" them. I get that is done, but that isn't what is meant here.
People in this thread still think the argument trans people are making here is that we are physically identical to cis people and the conversation is probably unfortunately never going to progress past that.
I mean, there are clearly areas of difference that just can't be ignored.
Context mattersTelling people to "shut the fuck up" and calling them "assholes" violates forum rules no matter how you slice it. I thought the bans were fair.
And yes, Clinton is still shit.
I'm sure I don't need to tell you this, but I imagine that for the vast majority of people out there, it's hard if not impossible to wrap their heads around the concept that gender and biology have absolutely no relationship. Most people I've even had this discussion with in real life have reacted as if they were being told to believe that the earth is flat even if they fully accept that transgender and gender dysphoria is a real thing.
This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend. There are aspects of her life that are simply different than my friend who is a cisgender woman. It is okay to acknowledge those differences. Nobody is saying that makes them "not a woman".Men born in different eras will lead different types of lives. Women born in different countries will lead different types of lives. Are they different types of men and women? Absurd.
Just stop, please.This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend. There are aspects of her life that are simply different than my friend who is a cisgender woman. It is okay to acknowledge those differences. Nobody is saying that makes them "not a woman".
I am Eritrean. I am not African American, even though I do live in America. There are differences between my life and background from those that are African American. Me acknowledging those difference does not mean I'm "not black". And sometimes those differences can be meaningful depending on the context. And when it comes to transgender/cisgender, it's not only meaningful in the hospital. I'm saying all this 100% with the mindset that this isn't about separating transgender women or men as being "others". It is frustrating when you get put on blast for not saying what the crowd is saying verbatim, even if others are being disgusting towards transgender people.
Take the example you just posted. You're only acknowledging an ethnic difference, not a racial difference. Even though you are Eritrean, do you believe others see you as simply black? Because I think the point being made by some posters here (and please correct me if I'm wrong, posters) is that the distinction between cis- and trans- is destructive when simply seeing them as female or a woman is what is preferred and is how every woman should be seen.This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend. There are aspects of her life that are simply different than my friend who is a cisgender woman. It is okay to acknowledge those differences. Nobody is saying that makes them "not a woman".
I am Eritrean. I am not African American, even though I do live in America. There are differences between my life and background from those that are African American. Me acknowledging those difference does not mean I'm "not black". And sometimes those differences can be meaningful depending on the context. And when it comes to transgender/cisgender, it's not only meaningful in the hospital. I'm saying all this 100% with the mindset that this isn't about separating transgender women or men as being "others". It is frustrating when you get put on blast for not saying what the crowd is saying verbatim, even if others are being disgusting towards transgender people.
People in this thread still think the argument trans people are making here is that we are physically identical to cis people and the conversation is probably unfortunately never going to progress past that.
Did you literally just "I have a trans friend"? Trans women are women, trans men are men. Any differences in our life experiences from cis people that exist are due to bigotry and sometimes due to medical aspects which are not the same as gender and are entirely private. Those differences are simply not relevant.This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend. There are aspects of her life that are simply different than my friend who is a cisgender woman. It is okay to acknowledge those differences. Nobody is saying that makes them "not a woman".
This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend. There are aspects of her life that are simply different than my friend who is a cisgender woman. It is okay to acknowledge those differences. Nobody is saying that makes them "not a woman".
I am Eritrean. I am not African American, even though I do live in America. There are differences between my life and background from those that are African American. Me acknowledging those difference does not mean I'm "not black". And sometimes those differences can be meaningful depending on the context. And when it comes to transgender/cisgender, it's not only meaningful in the hospital. I'm saying all this 100% with the mindset that this isn't about separating transgender women or men as being "others". It is frustrating when you get put on blast for not saying what the crowd is saying verbatim, even if others are being disgusting towards transgender people.
This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend.
Nah fuck that. Someone telling me that I am a lesser person and invalidating my existence can FUCK OFF RIGHT INTO THE SUN! That you came here to basically tell off us trans folks to shut up and sit down makes you a HUGE ASSHOLE!Telling people to "shut the fuck up" and calling them "assholes" violates forum rules no matter how you slice it. I thought the bans were fair.
And yes, Clinton is still shit.
I'm not saying "Don't just call me black" and I'm not saying "Don't just call transgender women as simply being women". All I'm saying is that the differences can be meaningful at times and it's not right to cast anything that tries to point out the meaningfulness of those differences as being transphobic.Take the example you just posted. You're only acknowledging an ethnic difference, not a racial difference. Even though you are Eritrean, do you believe others see you as simply black? Because I think the point being made by some posters here (and please correct me if I'm wrong, posters) is that the distinction between cis- and trans- is destructive when simply seeing them as female or a woman is what is preferred and is how every woman should be seen.
See, this is what I mean. The moment you start to diverge in any way on this, you're labeled as transphobic. There is no communication. It's just "Follow our prescribed thoughts or else you are transphobic."
And another one...Wow, we have actually reached the "I have a friend who is _____!" defense. Never thought I'd see the day...
This is just being dense. For example, I have a transgender woman who is a friend.
Wow, we have actually reached the "I have a friend who is _____!" defense. Never thought I'd see the day...
I said "I have a transgender woman who is a friend" and you quoted me saying "I have a trans friend", which I know is an offensive term. Stop this.Did you literally just "I have a trans friend"? Trans women are women, trans men are men. Any differences in our life experiences from cis people that exist are due to bigotry and sometimes due to medical aspects which are not the same as gender and are entirely private. Those differences are simply not relevant.
I'm not saying "Don't just call me black" and I'm not saying "Don't just call transgender women as simply being women". All I'm saying is that the differences can be meaningful at times and it's not right to cast anything that tries to point out the meaningfulness of those differences as being transphobic.
And to reiterate, these differences are much smaller than what is in common. But they can at times be important differences and I think transgender people know this and act accordingly. I don't act like I personally have been impacted by slavery because I wasn't. I am sure a transgender woman who has relatively recently transitioned isn't going act like she has dealt with a lot of the issues women have dealt with socially in their lives. Just like a cisgender woman shouldn't try and claim to be an experienced person on issues transgender women deal with.
See, this is what I mean. The moment you start to diverge in any way on this, you're labeled as transphobic. There is no communication. It's just "Follow our prescribed thoughts or else you are transphobic."
I voted for her in 2016, as she was obviously better than the alternative. I wasn't happy about it. I bloody hope I won't be put in the same position this time round, and given current polling, I am hopeful
Rearranging the words doesn't change what you're doing. You used the fact that you have a friend who is trans to defend your own false and transphobic statements. The fact is, those differences you keep talking about? They're not relevant. Trans women are women and trans men are men, pointing out differences such as that is exactly the kind of transphobia we're trying to eradicate. Our medical history is our private medical history. The bigotry we face is bigotry that we want to eliminate. Those differences are irrelevant to the fact that trans women are women and trans men are men. Pointing those superficial and irrelevant differences out only serves to reinforce the idea that trans people are "others".I said "I have a transgender woman who is a friend" and you quoted me saying "I have a trans friend", which I know is an offensive term. Stop this.
Nah fuck that. Someone telling me that I am a lesser person and invalidating my existence can FUCK OFF RIGHT INTO THE SUN! That you came here to basically tell off us trans folks to shut up and sit down makes you a HUGE ASSHOLE!
what term do you think is offensive here? trans is short for transgender it's used every day by lots of trans people to describe themselvesI said "I have a transgender woman who is a friend" and you quoted me saying "I have a trans friend", which I know is an offensive term. Stop this.