Here's a second cost break down
$30,000 boat (cheap end)
- Boat: $30,000 upwards. Most cruisers who are planning circumnavigation or offshore cruising will buy a boat that is considerably more expensive than this. We would recommend that if you're buying used, it's best to buy a boat that is already kitted out.
- Monthly budget for 2 people in the Caribbean and Europe: $3000
- Slush fund: as much as you can afford! We would recommend at least $5000 in savings to deal with any unforeseen circumstances. The older the boat, the more you may need in repairs, maintenance & equipment.
- Equipment: we've spent about $20,000 on equipment purely designed for offshore and trade wind passage making. Therefore, if you are planning to limit your cruising to a cruising ground such as the Caribbean, you may not need any of these items. They include: Parasailor, SSB radio, hydrovane, Watt and Sea hydrogenerator, wind generator, solar panels, Yellow Brick tracker, laptop for receiving GRIB files at sea (Mac Books are not compatible), flares, and spare parts. This doesn't include 'basics' such as autopilot, AIS, life-raft, EPIRB, sat phone, and code zero sail, fishing rods and lures, BBQ, cool box, etc.
$3000 x 12 budget = $36,000
$20,000 equipment
$5000 (low end estimate) for repairs
$91,000 without unforeseen costs, with a cheap boat, with low reserve fun and without any cost of anchorage
So my wife and child (as well as my 20 year old stepson) will meet me at least twice over the course of the journey at various ports. I will be more than fine on the trip with ample help at all points. My wife is fully supportive and I will be faithful as I have no desire to cheat on my her.
So basically you're abandoning your wife and kid for at least a year and really probably a hell of a lot more in the best case scenario.
This is pretty grossly judgemental tbh.
Who are you to speak about their relationship like this?
No it's not. You have no idea what relationship he has with his wife so calling it abandoning is judgemental and condescending.
If this is cool with his wife who are you to judge him the way you are? Kids adapt you know? Parents do leave home for long periods of time sometimes.
You forgot to also mention he is doing so to literally waste a boatload of money.
You forgot to also mention he is doing so to literally waste a boatload of money.
Dude... you literally said it's all good to leave your kid behind for years because they'll adapt.
The nonsense is long past the trying stage.
Oh crap it's a troll, nevermind :') Who seriously equates shoes to children lmao
nani the fuck
Which oven the right context? Sure. It really parents agree who are you to judge?
Parents go away all the time. Soldiers, explorers, actors. People who chose specific careeers or endeavours despite having kids.
Stop being so ridiculous judgemental.
No it's not. You have no idea what relationship he has with his wife so calling it abandoning is judgemental and condescending.
If this is cool with his wife who are you to judge him the way you are? Kids adapt you know? Parents do leave home for long periods of time sometimes.
It seems to me that there's a huge difference, however, in a father bailing on his kid because he's in the Army and has to do so or because he works in the oil industry and has to go overseas for a few months to provide for the family vs. someone who chooses to leave just because they want to. It's putting one's own wants above what's good for the kid. Depriving a kid of a parent for a year without a really compelling reason to do so is not something I could imagine doing to my kid.
If I were a kid I'd be much more understanding of "daddy has to go away for a year, but wishes he didn't" vs. "daddy left because there was something he wanted to do for fun", which by definition means that whatever daddy is doing is valued more highly than being with the child. The wife has the power to decide if that's OK with her or not. A young child can't really make that decision, so while I don't think I'd use the term "abandon" in relation to the wife I do think it's the right word to describe leaving a young child behind just to chase a hobby/personal goal that could be done a bit later when the kid is grown.
Parenting isn't a part time job that people can just opt out of for a year on a whim.
Key word is "career." Even that has its price I imagine. But this is masturbatory bullshit.
Or "endeaver".
Plenty of people take up endeavours that take them away from their families that are not necessary. And do so with other parents consenting and the child not being damaged by it.
I bet y'all could think of a few...
Which oven the right context? Sure. It really parents agree who are you to judge?
Parents go away all the time. Soldiers, explorers, actors. People who chose specific careeers or endeavours despite having kids.
Stop being so ridiculously judgemental.
Someone that bails on a young kid to backpack across the country, climb Everest, sail around the world or neglects their kid to play World of Warcraft for 19 hours a day is equally abandoning their kid and in each case I'd have the same advice - if that's what you want to do with your life then that's great, but you should have done it before having a child or after the child is old enough that it won't be so harmful to him/her. To do otherwise is putting one's own needs way above a child's, which seems to me to be bad parenting and horrifically unfair to the child.Or "endeaver".
Plenty of people take up endeavours that take them away from their families that are not necessary.
I bet y'all could think of a few...