Looks incredible.
Also, this.
"We are all clowns"
Christ, the Alt Right is going to be insufferable with this shit.
Also, this.
"We are all clowns"
Christ, the Alt Right is going to be insufferable with this shit.
Maybe he planted some bombs. Joker gas is too cartoony for this.
There's never been a clear origin story for the Joker. More often than not he just makes it up because that's what the joker does.I thought Joker's origins have been explored multiple times in comics?
isnt that the main difference between being a hero and villain?Raimi's Spider-Man: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, strive to be a better person.
Todd Phillips' Joker: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, I guess it makes logical sense you become murderer.
There are multiple takes, but the point of Joker is he doesn't have an origin.Him painting his tongue really squicked me out
Looks really really good, and really well made trailer as I don't really know the story beyond "Joker origin."
I've not read the comics myself, but people were saying that there have been clear origin stories made for the Joker in the past. I guess that's just not true?There's never been a clear origin story for the Joker. More often than not he just makes it up because that's what the joker does.
You ever seen the Dark Knight?
What about the Killing Joke?There's never been a clear origin story for the Joker. More often than not he just makes it up because that's what the joker does.
You ever seen the Dark Knight?
Raimi's Spider-Man: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, strive to be a better person.
Todd Phillips' Joker: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, I guess it makes logical sense you become murderer.
There's been several "origin stories" in the comics.What about the Killing Joke?
It sounds like you only know Joker from The Dark Knight because the Joker doesn't make up a backstory expect for in TDK.
There's a shit ton of different takes on the Joker from a shit ton of different writers. This is just another one.
Maybe he planted some bombs. Joker gas is too cartoony for this.
But those are villains within the context of movies about heroes they stand in contrast to.isnt that the main difference between being a hero and villain?
vulture, mysterio from the last 2 films
Raimi's Spider-Man: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, strive to be a better person.
Todd Phillips' Joker: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, I guess it makes logical sense you become murderer.
Raimi's Spider-Man: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, strive to be a better person.
Todd Phillips' Joker: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, I guess it makes logical sense you become murderer.
This version of the Joker is seeing what looks like a therapist. He is expressing his mental state to her, which is not stable. We're shown glimpses of him struggling with his emotions before he snaps. That reads as mental illness to me.The Joker does not have a mental illness. He just cracks one day because of shitty circumstances. It's not because he had an underlying mental issue which causes him to snap.
He's supposed to represent that anyone of us having a shitty day can snap at any moment. Forcing this whole mental illness aspect onto him just makes him more sympathetic and ruins his character imo.
There is Batman in this movie and he is the hero of the movie posing an alternative view point to Jokers world view?That's like the whole point of heroes/villains (and in the case of the Joker, him and Batman), no?
Raimi's Spider-Man: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, strive to be a better person.
Todd Phillips' Joker: When it feels like the whole world is shitting on you, I guess it makes logical sense you become murderer.
As the protagonist in his own film.
What's wrong with a villain protagonist? It's not like Joker's going to be running rampant in this film without any opposition.But those are villains within the context of movies about heroes they stand in contrast to.
I'm talking about filmmakers framing a character study about their protagonist.
Why does it have to be Batman to do that in this film?There is Batman in this movie and he is the hero of the movie posing an alternative view point to Jokers world view?
Both are sympathetic protagonists in their own films with their story being the one chosen by the filmmakers to be told.Why are you comparing Spiderman to Joker? A hero, to a villain?
There's been several "origin stories" in the comics.
It's always explained that it's a "multiple choice past".
Exact quote from the Killing Joke: "Something like that... happened to me, you know? I... I'm not exactly sure what it was. Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another... if I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!"
Generic and flat?Bro, you need to get your eyes checked asap lolHoly fuck everyone is so positive on twitter.
I don't understand, it looks so generic and flat.
I really don't get it. Is it just actor hype ?
Usually the protagonist has an antagonist working against them achieving their goals, yes.What's wrong with a villain protagonist? It's not like Joker's going to be running rampant in this film without any opposition.
And you think this film will be devoid of antagonists who are not into what the Joker is doing?Usually the protagonist has an antagonist working against them achieving their goals, yes.
Doesn't mean it has to be a person, or even someone representing an opposing view point that challenges the protagonist's and changes him by the end.
I thought Joker's origins have been explored multiple times in comics?
I'm not criticizing it because it's a different take, just that it looks like a bad take. I think the Joker only works strictly as an antagonist and if the movie proves me wrong... good I guess but looking at both trailers back to back I doubt it. It's like a second rate Scorsese knock off with the Joker as the main character.He's straight up the Red Hood in the Killing Joke and in Snyder's run years later. Then a few years back the whole Three Jokers thing happened.
Look, the Joker isn't always one thing. In TDK he had a unique take that hadn't been done before and each comic writer that writes him has a different take. Sometimes there are Elseworld stories that make him completely different (this is an Elseworld story). It feels pointless to criticize that this is a different take on the Joker when that's the whole point.
Not everything has to be the same and especially when it never is.
Usually the protagonist has an antagonist working against them achieving their goals, yes.
Doesn't mean it has to be a person, or even someone representing an opposing view point that challenges the protagonist's and changes him by the end.
breaking badBut those are villains within the context of movies about heroes they stand in contrast to.
I'm talking about filmmakers framing a character study about their protagonist.
You think he only works in a way he has only over been used before? You have no frame of reference to know if he can or cannot work as the protagonist.I'm not criticizing it because it's a different take, just that it looks like a bad take. I think the Joker only works strictly as an antagonist and if the movie proves me wrong... good I guess but looking at both trailers back to back I doubt it. It's like a second rate Scorsese knock off with the Joker as the main character.
Because this IS a what if. It doesn't take place in the DCU, it's not Leto's Joker (that's the definitive Joker right now), as far as we know it doesn't even have superheroes. This is a completely new take on the character, the point is that it's different. You're arguing for things to just be the same over and over and over and for what reason? Just because they have before?What's even the point of the Elseworld's comparison. This isn't a "what if" wacky take on the Joker. This is supposed to be the definitive Joker movie. Imagine if you argued that "you don't like Batman in BvS because it's different" and not that Batman himself dreams of using a gun in the movie.
"We are all clowns"
Christ, the Alt Right is going to be insufferable with this shit.
lol, was about to say... one of the most popular tv shows of the last decade was all about watching the protagonist's journey from normal person to villain.
I don't necessarily think that the movie will make people "who are not into what the Joker is doing" into the anatgonist. Is Aunt May an antagonist to Peter because she disapproves of some of the things he does? Not really.And you think this film will be devoid of antagonists who are not into what the Joker is doing?
The protagonist doesn't need to change by the end of any story by an antagonist. We're already seeing the focus on the metamorphosis from how he was before he embraced the feeling of being the "Joker" and after.
Lol. We literally have a quote of Philips saying the film isn't really even about the Joker, but about this man spiraling down to become him.
It's called Joker. Not, Joker, but about this man spiraling down to become him. Like are you all seriously pretending like it's not about the Joker. Or that wasn't greenlit because of the Joker. JFC.Lol. We literally have a quote of Philips saying the film isn't really even about the Joker, but about this man spiraling down to become him.