This isn't a port, it's a remake. The general idea was RDR1 always needed to be remade and that RDR2 has so much of that game's map lends itself to it. (It's also seemingly not real)So whatever happened to "RDR code is a mess and therefore it can't be ported" etc?
Probably Mafia 1 remake type of thing. Not the OG.So whatever happened to "RDR code is a mess and therefore it can't be ported" etc?
Read Dead 1 finally playable again. Dear God, I'm getting emotional.
Don't worry you will lol, it just won't be this..
Will pay top dollar for a next-gen enhanced version of the GOTG RDR2.
Well, fuck.and this right here is why bullshit Twitters like the one cited in the OP exist - because they know they can manipulate people into emotional reactions without presenting any meaningful evidence just by saying a few words.
Again: why are we taking a random unverified Twitter account called Gaming Leaks and Rumors seriously?
You'd expect even a basic cache or something. Not a single person saw it. No one ran to twitter with links. This one person randomly came across it and screenshotted it just in time.Don't people just scrap retailers for listings like these? Seems like this would be verified by at least one other person if it was real. (In other words I'm on team fake for this one)
I'd say the opposite, the weird secrecy of this industry feels so unnecessary.Also, why the fuck do companies let shops know about these surprises? It surely isnt that hard to create new listing for unnaounced game when it gets announced. How the fuck does these leaks keep happening? It would be so nice surprise.
I'd say the opposite, the weird secrecy of this industry feels so unnecessary.
I'm pretty convinced that the main reason they included New Austin in RDR2 (not to mention the unfinished Mexico map) is that they need it for the RDR remake. There was very little in New Austin in RDR2, it really didn't seem like it needed to be there for the most part, so this would make sense.This isn't a port, it's a remake. The general idea was RDR1 always needed to be remade and that RDR2 has so much of that game's map lends itself to it. (It's also seemingly not real)
I'm pretty convinced that the main reason they included New Austin in RDR2 (not to mention the unfinished Mexico map) is that they need it for the RDR remake. There was very little in New Austin in RDR2, it really didn't seem like it needed to be there for the most part, so this would make sense.
that's a good spot, it says get 60,00 off but math doesn't add upBTW just checked real ps5 games on Anazon dont say "get 60 dollars off instantly with Visa approval" they say "pay 11 dollars a month with Visa approval". *shrug* Its the 10 dollar difference between last and current gen.
Probably fake.