A bug on Youtube's end.So.. why Nintendo of america don't have a profile picture on twitter and youtube ? I'm intrigue
I just checked Twitter, NoA's profile pic is still there.So.. why Nintendo of america don't have a profile picture on twitter and youtube ? I'm intrigue
A few minutes ago they didn't have anything, weird, probably just a bug. But youtube still don't have one
you're probably right
Do the rumors still suggest it's just gonna be another normal handheld? I'd like there to be more to it, but it mostly just seems to be assumed to be a Switch with better internals.
After using ssd for pc, xsx and ps5 for years, fast storage is a must.
Do the rumors still suggest it's just gonna be another normal handheld? I'd like there to be more to it, but it mostly just seems to be assumed to be a Switch with better internals.
After how cheap SD cards where for the switch 1, buying storage expansion on the Switch 2 is going to hurt, isn't it? And I don't expect Nintendo to offer a lot of onboard storage......
That's interesting. I wonder if they're going for AR and 3D games and 3DS rereleases on it, with cameras/sensors for the AR and super-stable 3D.I think the rumour for a while was that something involving cameras would be the gimmick?
I hope not to the full extent of my being. The camera gimmick wore itself out in the Wii U/3DS era.I think the rumour for a while was that something involving cameras would be the gimmick?
That's the switch.For once I'd like the gimmick to be that there isn't a gimmick
Switch had basically the least gimmick, while still having some unique aspects. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯For once I'd like the gimmick to be that there isn't a gimmick
After how cheap SD cards where for the switch 1, buying storage expansion on the Switch 2 is going to hurt, isn't it? And I don't expect Nintendo to offer a lot of onboard storage......
After hearing about cameras being allegedly included in the new hardware, my mind immediately went to AR stuff when in handheld mode, and Kinect-style stuff when in console mode. 🤷
I'm hoping for no camera. No gimmick that takes away even a fraction of processing power anf RAM to games. But that's just me. 🤷♀️
Tweet just appeared randomly on my TL and I don't know them but random chip leakers seem to appear everywhere these days, but no clue if they have any legitimate history.
View: https://x.com/orexda/status/1783769461457404376?s=61&t=L0bPXDdqdqQM-JyYURxVeQ
They do say as early as H2 this year, which tbh even for a fake leaker is a dumb thing to suggest this late, so I think they are suggesting H2 based off component orders rather than information from developers others rely on. Just feels like even a fake leaker wouldn't try to stick to 2024 release at this point.
On the node size they say 7LPH, which as far as I can tell is an improvement over Samsung's 8nm (Samsung claims 50% less power consumption).
I think they just speak of component orders. Nintendo aimed for this year so there's probably sufficient components for a launch.The OLED and releasing this year part makes me think this is fake.
I think we talking about at least a year, if not two or three. Many people double-dipped for the Switch OLED, and since Nintendo doesn't sell their hardware at a loss they are basically missing out on additional sales if they release it too early.I think they just speak of component orders. Nintendo aimed for this year so there's probably sufficient components for a launch.
As for OLED, I admit that's trickier, but I won't be surprised if switch 2 OLED isn't too far behind the first launch this time, so they might already be ordering displays for that.
Hmm, maybe. Alternatively, it could be that they are launching 2 models, and developers only got one kit with LCD. Technically they don't need to know there's an OLED model coming as it requires zero work.I think we talking about at least a year, if not two or three. Many people double-dipped for the Switch OLED, and since Nintendo doesn't sell their hardware at a loss they are basically missing out on additional sales if they release it too early.
Oh? I honestly just had that tweet show up in my Twitter timeline and was like "oh great another new chip leaker I never heard of" but thought I might as well share it, didn't know they if they had (or on the contrary had negative) track record.
7nm is at least better than 8nm.Of course Nintendo is going with an outdated Samsung fabrication node. Fucking hell.
I don't even know how the widely speculated T239 specs and SoC would even work on a old, inefficient Samsung node. It's either going to be downclocked significantly or we're going to be getting 2 hours of battery life.
And let me guess, this thing is going to have 8 GB of RAM as well....
Of course Nintendo is going with an outdated Samsung fabrication node. Fucking hell.
I don't even know how the widely speculated T239 specs and SoC would even work on a old, inefficient Samsung node. It's either going to be downclocked significantly or we're going to be getting 2 hours of battery life.
And let me guess, this thing is going to have 8 GB of RAM as well....
You are correct but not exactly.
But at the very least, we'd have efficiency benefits over 8nm that'd make the reported size of the system as well as the 12 SMs mentioned in the Nvidia leak make more sense.You are correct but not exactly.
They are both the same base node, 8nm, 7nm, whatever you wanna call it, it's essentially the same thing as far as I can tell. This is an improved node over the 8nm base that is used in the RTX 30 series.
Per a Samsung article from 6 years ago they expected it to use 50% less power or be 20% more performant over the base node.Samsung Electronics Starts Production of EUV-based 7nm LPP Process | Samsung Semiconductor Global
The introduction of 7LPP is a clear demonstration of Samsung Foundry’s technology roadmap evolution and provides customers with a definite path to 3nm.semiconductor.samsung.com
What's weird is as far as I can tell this node was not used.
However, the reason why this makes sense is because it uses the same logic node, then porting the GPU chip from the Ampere architecture becomes easy, whereas it would actually be a lot more complex to port the chip forward to 5nm and below as they use different logic.
Yea, I'm just clarifying that it's not really 7nm vs 8nm, this is just a more efficient variant on the same logic.But at the very least, we'd have efficiency benefits over 8nm that'd make the reported size of the system as well as the 12 SMs mentioned in the Nvidia leak make more sense.
This would also make more sense if Switch 2 is purported to be backwards-compatible with Switch 1.However, the reason why this makes sense is because it uses the same logic node, then porting the GPU chip from the Ampere architecture becomes easy, whereas it would actually be a lot more complex to port the chip forward to 5nm and below as they use different logic.
Fair, though my logic was more that "8nm wouldn't make sense based on what's being reported as well as what leaked from Nvidia". While not the absolute best-case scenario, 7nm would at least make some sense in accordance with the rest of what I mentioned.Yea, I'm just clarifying that it's not really 7nm vs 8nm, this is just a more efficient variant on the same logic.
way too much smoke on these rumors that it's not 4nm, the dream is dead.I think it's still way too early to take any info regarding the process node as a confirmation, even from reliable sources.
Can you explain what's a node and why it would be bad like I was 10 pleaseOf course Nintendo is going with an outdated Samsung fabrication node. Fucking hell.
I don't even know how the widely speculated T239 specs and SoC would even work on a old, inefficient Samsung node. It's either going to be downclocked significantly or we're going to be getting 2 hours of battery life.
And let me guess, this thing is going to have 8 GB of RAM as well....