Hours of daylight, yes. Hours of daylight during operating hours, no.
Total, yes. High traffic afternoon hours...no.
And everyone forgets about it in a weekApparently not because this shit comes up every year and nothing gets done
And oddly enough, it doesn't do that well in polling either. It gets the majority, but not by as much as one might think.Apparently not because this shit comes up every year and nothing gets done
Hours of daylight, yes. Hours of daylight during operating hours, no.
Why would anyone want standard over dst? You actually like getting out of work at 5pm at it be dark? Dst allows for a lot of sunshine in the pm
Yup. Not even worth considering standard 100% of the time. No chance. I'll take DST 100%. It's fine.Standard time will never happen. Tourism industry is too powerful and will want as much daylight in the summer as possible.
The problem with those maps is 7am and 5pm aren't reasonable sunrise or sunset.
Reasonable sunset should be after 7 which gives people at least an hour after work to do things. Reasonable sunrise should be 6am which gives people at least an hour before work to do things.
Have Andy redo his maps for those times and we'll talk.
edit - people advocating one over the other are foolish 😜 They both suck at their "respective" solstices. Sunrise at 8:20am in the winter (DST permanent), and sunset at 7:30pm in the summer (ST permanent) both suck.
Dave Brown @dave_brown24
There it is. They talked about making Daylight Saving Time permanent on Fox & Friends yesterday
10:28 AM - Mar 11, 2019
Dave Brown @dave_brown24
"Basically everybody would like a little more sunshine in their life. As we spring forward today, what our bill would do in the fall, we eliminate the idea of falling back. So make it permanent sunshine long term. People are going to have a lot more sunshine"
10:32 AM - Mar 11, 2019
Jennifer Jacobs @JenniferJJacobs
Fox yesterday: "...permanent sunshine..."
Trump today: "Making Daylight Saving Time permanent is O.K. with me!"
10:38 AM - Mar 11, 2019
Dave Brown @dave_brown24
There it is. They talked about making Daylight Saving Time permanent on Fox & Friends yesterday
10:28 AM - Mar 11, 2019
Dave Brown @dave_brown24
"Basically everybody would like a little more sunshine in their life. As we spring forward today, what our bill would do in the fall, we eliminate the idea of falling back. So make it permanent sunshine long term. People are going to have a lot more sunshine"
10:32 AM - Mar 11, 2019
Jennifer Jacobs @JenniferJJacobs
Fox yesterday: "...permanent sunshine..."
Trump today: "Making Daylight Saving Time permanent is O.K. with me!"
10:38 AM - Mar 11, 2019
yea but sunrise at 820 sucks far far less than the sun going down at 430pm in winter in Texas on standard time.broken clock, twice a day, etc.
I honestly can't even fathom who is against this.
edit - people advocating one over the other are foolish 😜 They both suck at their "respective" solstices. Sunrise at 8:20am in the winter (DST permanent), and sunset at 7:30pm in the summer (ST permanent) both suck.
broken clock, twice a day, etc.
I honestly can't even fathom who is against this.
edit - people advocating one over the other are foolish 😜 They both suck at their "respective" solstices. Sunrise at 8:20am in the winter (DST permanent), and sunset at 7:30pm in the summer (ST permanent) both suck.
no, the solstices affect the hours of daylight. The closer you are to the winter solstice, the closer the daylight hours are to about 8 hours. The closer you are to the summer solstice, the closer the daylight hours are to about 12 hours.
Would this force other countries to do the same? I hope we in Canada would also adopt this.
I mean it already shifts. DST changeovers aren't the same in the US and the EU. Part of the year the East Coast of the US is GMT-4 and other parts of the year its GMT-5.YEah like ... you can't do DST. We already have timezones.
I'm all for ditching the switch but you gotta pick Standard, I don't see any other way.
If your argument is "I hate it when it's dark" or whatever, what do you propose is done about the existing international time zone framework? the whole thing shifts because you have feels about daylight hours?
I don't see why we should switch to either "permanently." I'm okay with how things are now.
who cares when retail businesses open? Most people have started out their day well before 8am. Get into a professional setting and most of the people have either been there for up to an hour already, or are just getting there at 8am.one demonstratably sucks more than the other. The vast majority of businesses do not open until 9 am, so adjusting the clock to give daylight to hours when the business world isn't even in operation is dumb. By contrast, even at the summer solstice, your daylight typically corresponds to hours when humanity is actually active.
DST all the way.
Here in Texas, during winter, I basically don't see sun during days I go to the office. I'll go into the office at 5:30 am, and get out at 5 pm, and both times are still in the dark. In the summer, I trade darkness in the afternoon for several hours of daylight. This gives me time, for example, to walk my dog and things of that sort. More sunlight when people are actually awake is just flat out smart.
I don't see why we should switch to either "permanently." I'm okay with how things are now.
The park's hours wouldn't change depending on the time of year
who cares when retail businesses open? Most people have started out their day well before 8am. Get into a professional setting and most of the people have either been there for up to an hour already, or are just getting there at 8am.
Does your workplace change its operating hours depending on the time of year?why tho
why do you need a national law to achieve what a theme park could trivially do on its own
Total, yes. High traffic afternoon hours...no.
I believe it needs to be standard myself as well in order to better mesh with the rest of the world, but most people don't have that opinion...mostly because they can't think about more than themselves.
This is where I sit. I'd prefer DST, but either is fine as long as it's permanent.
Whichever one lets it be lighter later is the one I vote for.
I prefer waking up in the dark. Easier on the eyes.
It's odd, I've never given this more than a seconds thought, however I do live in the UK which is only one timezone. Is this something that actually bothers a lot of people, perhaps in larger countries with multiple timezones?
Whichever one lets it be lighter later is the one I vote for.
I prefer waking up in the dark. Easier on the eyes.
That would be DST (the current time change)Whichever one lets it be lighter later is the one I vote for.
I prefer waking up in the dark. Easier on the eyes.