You were right then and you're still right now.I'm not still bitter about the time I made a thread about why it's weird we have to ask for this and a bunch of people tried to explain to me how it didn't make sense to the lore and why Zelda didn't need to playable or anything and how I clearly didn't didn't know about the series and was just being selfish for asking. That wasn't weird at all.
It's A Little Weird That We're Still Asking for Playable Zelda, Right?
I know people tend to point to Spirit Tracks or one of the Warriors games, but I feel like it's weird that we're still asking for playable Zelda when it comes to the main series. Like really consider the amount of games that have beaten that to the punch regarding reoccurring alternative...www.resetera.com
Even the latest Mario sidescroller have given the choice of playing as Peach and even Daisy!
Like how the hell are they so late at this for Zelda.
I would like a lesser game than Botw. Something a bit more focused like toot or mm
I mean...I'll take a hyrule warriors 3 that's more akin to Hyrule Warriors DE.
Would it be like a mini vesion of botw/totk some story that takes place after. or would it be a completely seperate gameplay style
would it feature a past zelda if the gameplay is not derived from botw?
would it feature a past zelda if the gameplay is not derived from botw?
Why is anybody taking this seriously? This guy has only seemingly ever gotten one thing right, which could've been complete guesswork.
Did everyone forget Jon Cartwright's WaddleDeeKnows lesson?
He's also not even saying he's heard anything, only that he wants it and thinks it's due.
Did everyone forget Jon Cartwright's WaddleDeeKnows lesson?
He's also not even saying he's heard anything, only that he wants it and thinks it's due.
Let's change it up a bit.
Fire Emblem x Legend of Zelda crossover:
#FE Hyrule.
I haven't heard any rumors on the internet of Koei Tecmo working on new projects for Nintendo.
👆👆👆
This always gets glossed over in these discussions. I view it as a disservice to make her a link skin swap, but that seems to be what people want
If it's the former, I'd expect it to be a Switch 2 launch title in the vain of Miles Morales (but I don't think they're hinting it's that, more just hinting as the potential for it with BotW/TotK design and story).
I would expect this to be it's own thing in whatever style that would drop whenever.
Personally, I'd like a 2D game, but that's just for Zelda in general, not specifically a Zelda lead game.
Capcom is no barrier. They don't own a single thing of the Oracle games or Minish Cap.
Yeah, only reason those weren't in is because the Oracles aren't as popular/iconic
Really says something that the one time we got total non-nintendo entries (CDI) they immediately took the obvious step of actually having zelda be a damn protagonist in a game - and not just one game but two out of the three games. Funny but sad that it's taken nintendo themselves like, what, 30 years to even start possibly doing it? Dire stuff.
Definitely wouldn't mind this if it were true let's see what happensDefinitely wouldn't mind this if it were true let's see what happens
Give me a Zelda JRPG for some reason.
... I'd buy it for a high price.
In the vein of Atelier Meruru?
... I'd buy it for a high price.
Oh really? Awesome lol
I said that because last time I brought up wanting Din/Nayru in Hyrule Warriors in a previous Definitive vs Age of Calamity thread, another user said Capcom kept them from being added
Zippo was that chaps name, and Papagenos (sounds like a Pizza place) isn't like that guy. Zippo was a koopa wearing that Mega Man avatar as he had "fake leaks" among other things.
My dream for this long rumored/wished for game has been for a much more action focused game than the mainline titles
Basically like Sekiro but with Zelda instead. So still action adventure but much more focused on combat and enemy encounters
I'm writing this post to basically try to manifest it
Basically like Sekiro but with Zelda instead. So still action adventure but much more focused on combat and enemy encounters
I'm writing this post to basically try to manifest it
Pyoro is the only leaker who's proven 100% legit time after time.
That being said, a Zelda game featuring her as the main player does feel inevitable in the way that a new Peach title felt inevitable as the characters other than Mario have seen their popularity grown alongside Mario; it also helps that Luigi's Mansion 3 has become a phenomenal seller and proved that Mario side-characters can star in potential evergreens.
Heck we're at the point where a Luigi's Mansion movie would be a realistic endeavor.
Zelda's popularity has grown alongside Link's to the point where fans likely wouldn't mind buying up 1-2 million copies of a simpler Princess Zelda game.
This does feel like a Monkey's Paw situation though because you're not getting a BotW or TotK game, you're obviously getting a Peach-like game.
That being said, a Zelda game featuring her as the main player does feel inevitable in the way that a new Peach title felt inevitable as the characters other than Mario have seen their popularity grown alongside Mario; it also helps that Luigi's Mansion 3 has become a phenomenal seller and proved that Mario side-characters can star in potential evergreens.
Heck we're at the point where a Luigi's Mansion movie would be a realistic endeavor.
Zelda's popularity has grown alongside Link's to the point where fans likely wouldn't mind buying up 1-2 million copies of a simpler Princess Zelda game.
This does feel like a Monkey's Paw situation though because you're not getting a BotW or TotK game, you're obviously getting a Peach-like game.
There was a moment when playing TOTK where I though "Oh shit they're gonna do a dual worlds things where I can swap between Zelda in the past and Link in the present, aren't they?" and then they didn't.
Which is to say, hey, people love trilogies. Reuse assets from BOTW/TOTK, find a bunch of gimmicks to make Zelda feel truly unique, and just do the Zelda part of what I thought they were doing.
Which is to say, hey, people love trilogies. Reuse assets from BOTW/TOTK, find a bunch of gimmicks to make Zelda feel truly unique, and just do the Zelda part of what I thought they were doing.
still bizarre to me how Nintendo experimenting with smaller or more unorthodox spin-offs is somehow a "monkey's paw" to a bunch of people of this thread.
Like, a peach showtime-like should be a good thing? Haven't we all been saying more AA or whatever? Wanting smaller titles in between big Zelda games that take 6 years to pump out?
Like, a peach showtime-like should be a good thing? Haven't we all been saying more AA or whatever? Wanting smaller titles in between big Zelda games that take 6 years to pump out?
That's not the same kind of leaker though. He doesn't reveal stuff that's far out, he gets info about stuff that's about to be officially announced and leaks it shortly ahead of time. That's like The Snitch who did similar things.
I don't think a game starring Zelda as the main playable character automatically means it would be as mechanically simplistic and low difficulty as Princess Peach Show Time. Princess Peach Show Time is aimed at children and is even more simple and forgiving than your standard Kirby game.
I think a Zelda game appeals to the same audience that can master the complexity of a traditional Zelda game. I don't think a game starring playable Zelda would be on the scale of TOTK, but it wouldn't have to be squarely aimed at children either. A Zelda game could be any manner of 3d action adventure game.
Sure, but a year ago would any of use have said this about a Peach game? Because people make the exact same arguments about Mario and Kirby and then say the post game stuff is geared more toward "core" players.
