What kind of censorship is being fought here?I don't really see any problem with these tho
If its for the sake of fighting censorship and the necessity for creators to adapt around everybody else than themselves in order to deliver something, then it's more than ok
Need to get his t shirt too, its hilarious. fuck labels.
you forgot the "/s" at the end, some people are going to believe that you are being seriousI feel we need to look at regulation in game design where diversity and inclusiveness is a requirement for sale on the market. It is the only way to deal with people such as the creator of this game. Tell the developers if they cant meet a list of legal requirements, it is considered hate speech and cannot be sold.
Its the only way to solve these differing opinions.
I don't really see any problem with these tho
If its for the sake of fighting censorship and the necessity for creators to adapt around everybody else than themselves in order to deliver something, then it's more than ok
Need to get his t shirt too, its hilarious. fuck labels.
See this is why I hated Gamergate, both sides viewed each other in such insane extremes that it was just absurd. It was just people creating and bashing strawmen.
Lol no it's the only way to make your point of view win. Every studio and every game director should be allowed to make the game according to their vision. You can then buy the game if you like and accept that vision or skip it if you don't.I feel we need to look at regulation in game design where diversity and inclusiveness is a requirement for sale on the market. It is the only way to deal with people such as the creator of this game. Tell the developers if they cant meet a list of legal requirements, it is considered hate speech and cannot be sold.
Its the only way to solve these differing opinions.
Never seen anyone get unfairly called misogynistic when it comes to her. I've criticized her plenty and so have others and no one called me misogynistic. I wonder why?
Well that's because Sargon is human trash.Sargon was called human trash because of he criticised her. So there's one example.
Nope, Sargon was called human trash because he harassed her, and also, he's human trash.Sargon was called human trash because of he criticised her. So there's one example.
Nope, Sargon was called human trash because he harassed her, and also, he's human trash.
Got any better examples?
The problem with the 'both sides' fence sitting (and I do appreciate the thought you've put into your posts) is that intentionally or not, you end up downplaying that GamerGate was a harassment campaign. When people point to Anita as being on the other side, they're ignoring that she didn't choose to be one of the key targets of a harassment campaign. I've never really understood what the other side of GamerGate was even meant to be... but it seems to often be described as a lot of far left people on twitter. To me those are people who were justly upset at a harassment campaign. Maybe they over reacted, I don't know, but they don't represent all the people who disagreed with GamerGate's goals.No not at all, there were without a doubt malicious trolls probably 95% was coming from the "Pro-Gamergate" side. That's what I meant when I said "trolls trolling trolls." You'd get people who would spam Anita's videos regularly on /v/ because they knew it would get a rise out of posters.
I ended up getting blocked by a few notable people on Twitter (people I like) because I happened to have been a follower of Thunderf00t.
Now do I condone everything Thunderf00t says, FUCK NO! His Anita videos were largely nitpicky and stupid. That guy has said a lot of stupid shit. But I enjoy enough of his content to retweet his good stuff and to those with an itchy trigger finger that was enough to label me Pro-Gamergate.
I have never sent death threats to anyone, I haven't been racist on the internet since I dunno the mid-2000s, and I don't give a shit if some little gaming blog makes articles about their friends.
There's a lot more people like me who never did anything wrong but got stupidly swept up in that mess that ultimately was a big nothing. A giant waste of time. People jumping down each other's throats for no damn reason.
Now you want to slyly compare me to Trump go right ahead, but you're proving my damn point by making a strawman out of my post.
A product is different from a narrative work. This is one of the worst recurring arguments I've seen. The writers' biases and feelings will be consciously part of the game or creep in subconsciously. There is no such thing as an apolitical narrative work.
Listen, we all know capitalism sucks. We're complicit in a lot of things we wish we weren't.
People are still going to try to vote with their wallets when they can and they're right to do so. The line for a lot of people might be one of convenience but I don't think that's arbitrary, just realistic. I think people probably should push further but "not buying a game where one of the most notable people working on it is known for being garbage" isn't exactly controversial to me.
The line is when I need the product to earn a living and for me a video game isn't one. My cellphone computer etc is
https://www.polygon.com/features/2017/6/27/15880582/anita-sarkeesian-garbage-human-vidcon-interviewHe never harassed her. That's complete bs
Try keeping your bias of him out of this
He never harassed her. That's complete bs
Try keeping your bias of him out of this
https://www.polygon.com/features/2017/6/27/15880582/anita-sarkeesian-garbage-human-vidcon-interview
https://www.themarysue.com/sarkeesian-v-garbage-humans/
In any case, this thread isn't about Anita or Sargon. But keep this in mind next time you want to defend an openly misogynistic and racist Youtuber.
I predict most of gaming side is going to have no problem "separating" art from the artist. Though what they really mean is they don't care if the people they support are bigots.
Personally Vavra ain't getting a penny from me. There's too many other games in my infinite backlog for me to willingly hand over money to known filth.
Sargon was a big name in GG early on and we all know what that involved.
You're really trying to say he never harassed her?
I feel we need to look at regulation in game design where diversity and inclusiveness is a requirement for sale on the market. It is the only way to deal with people such as the creator of this game. Tell the developers if they cant meet a list of legal requirements, it is considered hate speech and cannot be sold.
Its the only way to solve these differing opinions.
The take-away I get from this is that Vavra is an asshole
What's worse is that his ego won't let him admit he's being an asshole
Imagine if Trump got something right, he'd lord it over everyone's head
That's what this guy is doing. He's basically going, "BOHEMIA WAS ALL WHITE YOU SJW CUNTS!"
His information is correct but his presentation is wrong
I feel we need to look at regulation in game design where diversity and inclusiveness is a requirement for sale on the market. It is the only way to deal with people such as the creator of this game. Tell the developers if they cant meet a list of legal requirements, it is considered hate speech and cannot be sold.
Its the only way to solve these differing opinions.
I feel we need to look at regulation in game design where diversity and inclusiveness is a requirement for sale on the market. It is the only way to deal with people such as the creator of this game. Tell the developers if they cant meet a list of legal requirements, it is considered hate speech and cannot be sold.
Its the only way to solve these differing opinions.
Not buying a game because some person that worked on it says something Stupid is asinine. The world is filled with dumbasses and lots of them work on lots of stuff you use.
on a certain level it's impossible to separate an "artist" from their "art"
vavra is an unabashed trump supporter and gamergate enthusiast so he can get fucked. if his game is good i might give it a spin, but i won't be paying for it
i'm not super educated on the subject, but i dont really think its a big deal whether this dudes one tiny historical fiction game in rural germany or wherever has poc. (vs something like the witcher, that represents a sprawling and fantastical world and is kinda making a statement by being Whites Only.)
however that aside the dude clearly fuckin sucks, says a bunch of vile anti sjw and pro gamergate shit, and doesn't seem like the type to keep his cryptofascism out of his game's writing, so no thanks on this game.
It is Bohemia. Part of what is now the Czech Republic. Not "rural Germany or whatever". Ugh.
Not really surprising based on the subject matter.Incredible how quickly this thread brought out the Gamer Gate crowd.
Hopefully the OT won't have too much of this shit. One person does not represent a developer.
I mean the topic of the thread (title) is absolutely legit and it's frankly an interesting discussion to have. However I also hope that the future OT as well as future threads about this specific matter will stay "separate" in a way that one won't interfere with discussion of the other.Not really surprising based on the subject matter.
Personally I'm not getting involved anymore. This thread has run it's course for me.
Hopefully the OT won't have too much of this shit. One person does not represent a developer.
Nope. He follows some stupid idiots who I dislike, but I don't see anything there even remotely worthy enough to call him a Nazi.
I mean the topic of the thread (title) is absolutely legit and it's frankly an interesting discussion to have. However I also hope that the future OT as well as future threads about this specific matter will stay "separate" in a way that one won't interfere with discussion of the other.
I don't get that position either.
Can someone explain the controversy about the historical accuracy? Are they historically inaccurate by not including POC?
Can someone explain the controversy about the historical accuracy? Are they historically inaccurate by not including POC?
Is BS.Ultimately he justifies his position with a nationalistic stance with an anti-imperialistic reflex. He merely says he was born in the Region in question and that is why he purports to know more about the history of the region than any historian who may come along: a history which he appears to perceive as his history.
Was Bohemia 100% white? No.
Would you expect to run into POC in every village and town? Of course not.
It's fine to have a town full of white folk, the problem is when the guy in charge takes such pride in being a Gamergate, alt-right shit head.
That question has been hotly debated but the truth likely falls closer to them actually being historically accurate. There were probably some people of color in inland parts of Europe at that time, but this game is recreating a small area of Bohemia that wasn't really especially noteworthy as a cultural hub or trade route, so while it's not completely unimaginable that there could have been some groups, it's most certainly not a glaring or even an unreasonable omission to leave them out.
The controversy stems from the fact that the lead guy has had questionable social media activity, namely supporting elements of GamerGate and making some callous jokes and comments. There have also been debates as to what constitutes diversity, because the game does include a range of ethnic groups that certainly were in the region at the time, they just are not peoples of color.
That's basically it.
Can someone explain the controversy about the historical accuracy? Are they historically inaccurate by not including POC?
Historically speaking, yes, PoC would have been very rare in the region. That said, that does not mean they wouldn't have been there period, which the guy waffles back and forth on.Can someone explain the controversy about the historical accuracy? Are they historically inaccurate by not including POC?
Vavra himself repeatedly affirmed there were no PoC (period) at the time in the area, which has been proved wrong because there are images of art that depicts people of color in this area around the time the game takes place, even some religious figures.Can someone explain the controversy about the historical accuracy? Are they historically inaccurate by not including POC?