Everything else I get, but what is this?
Are people screwing houses..?
Everything else I get, but what is this?
This 100%. Incest porn is the most viewed on every site these days. Very strange...
I've been told it's popular that is. I wouldn't know myself
Because it gives more money because more people watch it. I think it's gross as fuck.Usually has the best looking girls, camera work, and lighting tbh.
I've heard the argument that the fact this is even a category of porn is demeaning to trans people, as it calls them out as "different" than other people.
They suggest it should be de-categorized.
What do you think?
Well... Not everyone can get aroused by the sight of a woman with a dick or a dude with a pussy. So having categories for those still under transformation is perfectly fine.
As for trans people who finished the total transformation, they should be allowed in the regular categories.
That's my take on it at least.
Looked it up. It's an entire category for fucking real estate agents, landlords, and tenantsEverything else I get, but what is this?
Are people screwing houses..?
its you bang the sexy realtor whos trying to sell you a houseEverything else I get, but what is this?
Are people screwing houses..?
His statement in no way rules out the possibility that the categories as they stand may be flawed."but I don't find black women arousing why are they in the brunnete category ?"
Well... Not everyone can get aroused by the sight of a woman with a dick or a dude with a pussy. So having categories for those still under transformation is perfectly fine.
As for trans people who finished the total transformation, they should be allowed in the regular categories.
That's my take on it at least.
"but I don't find black women arousing why are they in the brunnete category ?"
But a pre-op trans woman is still a woman. If someone doesn't find a particular woman attractive they should click another link, and maybe not instead relegate the people to solely their own sub-category.
That being said, the weird part is not having a category, is they being EXCLUSIVE to said category.
Like there are categories for black cis women but when you click general women porn you see a black women here and there. Why trans women should be different ?
Gay porn is a different beast I agree and generally more positive but it has some sketchy racial elements too, let's be real.Don't agree. Most gay porn from the mainstream producers I have found to be rather supportive and empowering.
That isn't to say that gross shit doesn't exist.
"but I don't find black women arousing why are they in the brunnete category ?"
Yeah. I am kinda into interracial and it seems that there is a single type of black males that are allowed to participate.Gay porn is a different beast I agree and generally more positive but it has some sketchy racial elements too, let's be real.
That being said, the weird part is not having a category, is they being EXCLUSIVE to said category.
I mean there are categories for people that want to fuck cars.
There's still categories for black women. And they are indeed brunettes.
It's just that if you select a specific category, you'll have mostly those who are part of this category. And the other categories will probably have less.
And it's not like the tags are always accurate. You can often find dudes in videos tagged as "lesbian". So... It's just a way to filter a bit to find what you want to see.
Ebony women found a white category and white women found in an ebony category are usually there because someone mistagged the video trying to get more views. Like when someone puts teen porn in the mature section. It's not because it's the intended area.
Well, if you believe Stephen King (via a character in Christine) "nothing smells better than a new car...'cept pussy."
What I meant is in more broad categories.
"lesbian" vs "interracial lesbian"
It is kinda hard to use black woman as an example because porn categories are pretty racist on itself but yeah, if there is a chance of having a black woman in there, there should be a chance of having a trans woman too.
Say it's the most generic, vanilla video of a biological male and female having sex. Do the two actors need to sign statements as to how they identify so that the sites know whether to categorize it as straight, gay, or lesbian? And would those categories based on how the two actors identify really be useful for site visitors looking for porn?
The "trans" category on a porn site isn't telling you what the actors identify as, it's telling you that one or both of them have both boy and girl parts. This seems pretty straightforward.
Chaturbate is an example : you've got broad categories for cis-girls, cis-guys, couples and trans. Yet on the home page, everyone is mashed together.
What I meant is in more broad categories.
"lesbian" vs "interracial lesbian"
It is kinda hard to use black woman as an example because porn categories are pretty racist on itself but yeah, if there is a chance of having a black woman in there, there should be a chance of having a trans woman too.
You're not.Trans people can have a category.
The problem is going for lesbian category and not seeing a woman fucking a woman, or going to a woman doing blowjobs and not seeing a woman doing a blowjob.
Making trans women exclusive to a trans categories means the site is saying we are not women
Practically, it would be a nightmare. As a certain percentage of men who click on a video looking for a cis women are liable to be very angry.
Really, probably the bigger thing would be how trans people are generally portrayed. Lots of shemale and other demeaning terms.
Practically, it would be a nightmare. As a certain percentage of men who click on a video looking for a cis women are liable to be very angry.
Really, probably the bigger thing would be how trans people are generally portrayed. Lots of shemale and other demeaning terms.
You can't just be a decent person right