USA only, I believe.
USA only, I believe.
I'm pretty sure selling "early access ", a trend that I absolutely hate, for $35 bucks to gamepass owners contributed to this as well. Gotta cash in on that FOMO.
I mean good for them and all on the sales, but I personally think the practice of selling specifically early access is disgusting. That goes for all platforms and games, before some jackhole comes in and tells me I'm a hater.
Yeah, thanks for being kind about it, I didn't take offense :)Yeah my initial post was just saying we already had the general info in the other thread but it was by no means a slight against you though, just wanted to make that clear lol
The mainstream continues to choose games to the chagrin of some.
Why would this need to be a separate thread? Are we going to make a thread to run alongside the monthly sales thread for every single game that sells well? Did anyone think it wouldn't sell well?
I don't think you're too much of a hater, although maybe calling it "disgusting" is a stretch. In this particular case, you didn't only get Early Access, but you also got the entire first Story Expansion (as well as some digital goodies and DLC skins). For $30, you have to guess that isn't too far off from what the actual Story Expansion will really cost, anyway.I'm pretty sure selling "early access ", a trend that I absolutely hate, for $35 bucks to gamepass owners contributed to this as well. Gotta cash in on that FOMO.
I mean good for them and all on the sales, but I personally think the practice of selling specifically early access is disgusting. That goes for all platforms and games, before some jackhole comes in and tells me I'm a hater.
No it doesn't lmao a game being on game pass doesn't make it special whatsoever
So on Steam? Or people went out of their way buying the Windows version?
Why would this need to be a separate thread? Are we going to make a thread to run alongside the monthly sales thread for every single game that sells well? Did anyone think it wouldn't sell well?
Why would this need to be a separate thread? Are we going to make a thread to run alongside the monthly sales thread for every single game that sells well? Did anyone think it wouldn't sell well?
wonder if you felt this strongly for specific sales threads about zelda, elden ring, etc, etc.
When Starfield released earlier last quarter, it was critically mixed and had 83 score on MetaCritic. The game was missing a lot of the special Betheda magic. A Jason Schreier exposé revealed a tumultuous and disastrous development cycle that led to Pete Hines leaving Betheda because of how far this game strayed from Bethedas's DNA.
And through all that, Xbox leadership rightfully took flak for Betheda´s failures. Leadership should have intervened earlier in the game's development, to help Betheda steer the game towards a more positive path.
A few weeks after Starfield release, through Xbox's keen stewardship, we have the sales numbers of this game under the Zenimax banner: Starfield by Bethesda Game Studios. And the word around the grapevine is that for all intents and purposes, Starfield has benefited from an entire year of QA testing and polish, backed behind the full might of Microsoft's resources. A few days after it´s release, we finally saw something very special happen: Microsoft joining the likes of Sony and Nintendo in having a Circana-NPD top 10 title YTD that dominates the zeitgeist.
Yes. Quite a few. Check the player count threads from last month.Why would this need to be a separate thread? Are we going to make a thread to run alongside the monthly sales thread for every single game that sells well? Did anyone think it wouldn't sell well?
Why would this need to be a separate thread? Are we going to make a thread to run alongside the monthly sales thread for every single game that sells well? Did anyone think it wouldn't sell well?
Yup. It's a 6/10 game through and through, even my friend who's a massive Bethesda fanboy said the same, and for the record I don't hate their games and really wanted it to be special.
Those were threads made because specific numbers were met and announced by the publisher of the game. This is a thread that takes the exact same information from the Circana sales thread to make a new thread; there's no reason for it whatsoever as it imparts no new information. Plus we've already had threads about Starfield doing well sales-wise anyways.wonder if you felt this strongly for specific sales threads about zelda, elden ring, etc, etc.
It's more about the scale of its success in the overall yearly best-sellers list, since it was only selling for a couple weeks and still landed in the top-10 for totals. If you look at what it displaced, it really is a huge success. There have been threads exactly like this for as far back as I can remember, so this isn't unusual. Closer to the start of the year we certainly had it for TotK; It keeps overall Circana discussion a little more balanced with the variety of info in there, and the discussion around a particularly big release happen normally elsewhere.
Those were threads made because specific numbers were met and announced by the publisher of the game. This is a thread that takes the exact same information from the Circana sales thread to make a new thread; there's no reason for it whatsoever as it imparts no new information. Plus we've already had threads about Starfield doing well sales-wise anyways.
I don't care about console war shit and own an Xbox, but I do find it fascinating what people are allowed to post here - I thought this forum generally had a rule against duplicative threads
To be fair so far we've had:
A pre release thread thanking Microsoft for their keen stewardship in delivering this game to use
A congratulatory thread for 6 million users
A congratulatory thread for 1 million concurrent users
A congratulatory thread for 10 million users
And now this thread
I can see how it's starting to grate for some. We get it already, Starfield is the greatest success ever, three cheers for Starfield
I mean if folks can't be happy about success stories to the point of the information being grating, they should take a break from the internet or just set the threads to ignore.To be fair so far we've had:
A pre release thread thanking Microsoft for their keen stewardship in delivering this game to use
A congratulatory thread for 6 million users
A congratulatory thread for 1 million concurrent users
A congratulatory thread for 10 million users
And now this thread
I can see how it's starting to grate for some. We get it already, Starfield is the greatest success ever, three cheers for Starfield
People will be playing Starfield on mass for years. Mods will keep Starfield going for a long time.
I'm sure the Starfield launch is gigantic, and I'm happy for it because I love their games, but using rankings as a measure of success is useless. We all know how big of a franchise Call of Duty is, and that is the franchise that kept prior Bethesda games that launched in November from reaching #1. Just because Starfield now ended up being #1 when releasing in September doesn't make it a bigger success then their prior releases. Maybe it is, but we just don't know based on rankings.Should be in the OP. Yep, this is huge no matter how much some folk desperately try to spin it.
Understood, this is actually informative and I appreciate it. ThanksReport the thread with your explanation if you think it's actually a problem. Mods may even agree with you, but otherwise repeatedly complaining about a thread-topic ("thread whining") is specifically against the rules. I see you have less than 100 total posts, so you may be less familiar with the forum, but that "Report" button below any posts (including the OP) would let you do that, and add text for an explanation of why. It's quick-and-easy, and it's way better than arguing with non-mods about what moderation should be happening.
Wow, I assume it's in descending order? You have to scroll down pretty far to find it.Probably not that great.
It sits very low in the global Steam top sellers right now. BG3 in comparison, a game released one month earlier, is still in the top 5 paid games. Even Skyrim is still above Starfield.
Steam Search
store.steampowered.com
ChatGPT, please write a ResetEra post about Starfield being the top selling game in September.When Starfield released earlier last quarter, it was critically mixed and had 83 score on MetaCritic. The game was missing a lot of the special Betheda magic. A Jason Schreier exposé revealed a tumultuous and disastrous development cycle that led to Pete Hines leaving Betheda because of how far this game strayed from Bethedas's DNA.
And through all that, Xbox leadership rightfully took flak for Betheda´s failures. Leadership should have intervened earlier in the game's development, to help Betheda steer the game towards a more positive path.
A few weeks after Starfield release, through Xbox's keen stewardship, we have the sales numbers of this game under the Zenimax banner: Starfield by Bethesda Game Studios. And the word around the grapevine is that for all intents and purposes, Starfield has benefited from an entire year of QA testing and polish, backed behind the full might of Microsoft's resources. A few days after it´s release, we finally saw something very special happen: Microsoft joining the likes of Sony and Nintendo in having a Circana-NPD top 10 title YTD that dominates the zeitgeist.
True. Though when Starfield hit 1million concurrent only 200k were on steam. So we can roughly say only 20% of the playerbase is on steam.Sure no denying that. Just talking about the legs compared to those two game that were mentioned, considering the current player count Starfield has was the player count Skyrim started to avarage 4-5 years in after its release.
Understood, this is actually informative and I appreciate it. Thanks
I'm sure the Starfield launch is gigantic, and I'm happy for it because I love their games, but using rankings as a measure of success is useless. We all know how big of a franchise Call of Duty is, and that is the franchise that kept prior Bethesda games that launched in November from reaching #1. Just because Starfield now ended up being #1 when releasing in September doesn't make it a bigger success then their prior releases. Maybe it is, but we just don't know based on rankings.
To be fair so far we've had:
A pre release thread thanking Microsoft for their keen stewardship in delivering this game to use
A congratulatory thread for 6 million users
A congratulatory thread for 1 million concurrent users
A congratulatory thread for 10 million users
And now this thread
I can see how it's starting to grate for some. We get it already, Starfield is the greatest success ever, three cheers for Starfield
Whilst true, those games have also just had a deep discount.Wow, I assume it's in descending order? You have to scroll down pretty far to find it.
Even old games like DOS2 and No Man's Sky are ahead.
It's a Montresor copy-pasta
My response to this and the other quote saying I don't know what FOMO is:I don't think you're too much of a hater, although maybe calling it "disgusting" is a stretch. In this particular case, you didn't only get Early Access, but you also got the entire first Story Expansion (as well as some digital goodies and DLC skins). For $30, you have to guess that isn't too far off from what the actual Story Expansion will really cost, anyway.
So my thoughts are that while the trend isn't amazing, as long as you're still getting other tangible value out of the prepayment such as the story expansion here, my opinion is that it is not quite as bad as you think.
To be fair so far we've had:
A pre release thread thanking Microsoft for their keen stewardship in delivering this game to use
A congratulatory thread for 6 million users
A congratulatory thread for 1 million concurrent users
A congratulatory thread for 10 million users
And now this thread
I can see how it's starting to grate for some. We get it already, Starfield is the greatest success ever, three cheers for Starfield