If CP2077 misses the VGA deadline, then TLoU2 probably takes the VGA GoTY
The Last of Us Part II - Review Thread
- Thread starter vestan
- Start date
If CP2077 misses the VGA deadline, then TLoU2 probably takes the VGA GoTY
بررسی بازی The Last of Us Part 2 - بازی سنتر
گیمرها شاید معدود خوششانسهای این روزها باشند که میتوانند در چنین شرایطی به تجربه اثری همچون The Last of Us Part 2 مشغول شوند.
www.bazicenter.com
Who the fuck is Tyrone?and why would we care? nothing this year so far has any chance against this game,this says a lot about this guy opinion and he is for months saying bullshit,the only game with chances is Cyberpunk 2077,yet the game has to be amazing.
Absolutely. I just finished, and I was so emotional that I just sat in my chair for a while. It's an incredible game, an achievement in interactive storytelling.
Yeah there's rather many of us from what I can tell. Just feels like the consensus seems far more hate-oriented when you take to areas such as Youtube/Twitch/other social media areas. Many people with large influences (AngryJoe and so forth) are gonna tear this game a new one. I've had friends say "I heard it's pretty bad" and I'm like ..no. Sigh.
Fuck him. The only thing he's proven during this shit is that he's a fucking child and I hesitate to call him that because its an insult to children.
Did he seriously try to compare the game possibly winning GOTY to the George Floyd murder in that it would cause (internet) mass riots? Fuck off.
Edit: in another video he's also implying Sony paid reviewers. Genuinely wish bullshit like that would be taken offline by Sony.
Last edited:
Negativity brings clicks. But, hey, I think Angry Joe is at mostly honest - so, I guess we'll see if he likes the game or not.
When it comes to gameplay, Angry Joe is prety honest and i take is reviews very well ( he loved the first one), so i dont expect him to complete shit on the game but i dont expect him to give a 10, if i had to guess i whould say he is going to give it a 7/8 overall.
He's already said he flat out dislikes the story, pacing and characters based on his stream. He's at the halfway mark.
what about the gameplay and design? Those are undisputably great and very important to a video GAME so id hope he talks about them as long as he talks about the story.
Not sure, they sure are dying a lot though xD His closing words were ''I can't take anymore of this'' as they ended the stream...
Not in reference to the gameplay though*
Ah okok. I think if he sees it for the whole package it will get a 7 or 8. If he's gonna be unfair he will give it a 5 but hopefully he experiences the magic that is this games combat encounters.
Yah that is prety bad, oh well, i do think peopel are making the game look worse that it is and are exaggerating quit a lot.
User Banned (1 Week) - Unmarked Spoilers
After playing it tonight, I'm happy I didn't bought it.
I deliberately went towards the spoil, so I waited for my friends to end their games for us to talk about it.
I give it a 7. Mostly because I didn't like the story.
9 for the graphics a very beautiful game.
8 for the gameplay, better than part 1, many killing ways. Even tho I don't like Abby, playing with here is funny with all the power she has. The enemies are smarter and it's difficult at first. At the end it's basically a loop.
4 for the story, hoped for better. Maybe it went over my head.
The flashback were amazing.
The cast around Abby wasn't interesting. A DLC with her and Lev can help on that subject. I liked Owen weirdly. Talking about all that crap and still cheating on his pregnant girlfriend. I hated Manny.
Dina was perfect and the fact that Ellie left everything and still couldn't finish the job was sad.
And we all know the other incoherences yadi yada ya ( Tommy's survival etc..)
I deliberately went towards the spoil, so I waited for my friends to end their games for us to talk about it.
I give it a 7. Mostly because I didn't like the story.
9 for the graphics a very beautiful game.
8 for the gameplay, better than part 1, many killing ways. Even tho I don't like Abby, playing with here is funny with all the power she has. The enemies are smarter and it's difficult at first. At the end it's basically a loop.
4 for the story, hoped for better. Maybe it went over my head.
The flashback were amazing.
The cast around Abby wasn't interesting. A DLC with her and Lev can help on that subject. I liked Owen weirdly. Talking about all that crap and still cheating on his pregnant girlfriend. I hated Manny.
Dina was perfect and the fact that Ellie left everything and still couldn't finish the job was sad.
And we all know the other incoherences yadi yada ya ( Tommy's survival etc..)
Last edited:
What tf is wrong with you?
My God I understand if you're upset at the story but how hard is it to use the spoiler tag lol
With the way the covid situation is will the TGA even be held? If its an online only thing the cut off date shouldn't be a concern.
Judging by the sheer number of user reviews on Metacritic, the speed running community is absolutely massive.
Now that would be interesting
I do think GoT is gonna be another Spiderman/HZD situation where it's gonna get nominated but not win much lol
Cut off date is more so for people to beat and digest the game. If it's an online event, the cutoff date wouldn't change.
Tyrone, my fellow negro, nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! What is you doing, baby? You done lost your mind.
As someone nearing the end, I'm going to have to disagree there.
After finishing it, it's definitely up there. I don't know if it fully achieves in ALL of its ambitions, but I'm going to be haunted by this game for a long time. I finished it at 5 this morning and I can't stop thinking about everything, in the same way that I would be thinking about a really effecting book or film.
It's an incredible experience.
It's also the most ambitious third person action game since RE4. It's the type of AAA game I honestly never thought I'd ever see again.
God, it was so damn good.
I think there are a few moments that feel a little too trial and error, but overall the combat and exploration are some of the most rewarding in the the third person genre. Gears 5 did not make my pulse jump up to the 150's at any moment in gameplay. This did, multiple times over and over. Absolutely thrilling.
I find the gameplay to be improved in every way and the encounters are super tense and fun (can't wait to to unlock more abilities and also play again on groudned), reminds me a bit of MGSV. But it's not an indisputable truth that the gameplay is great, might not be fun for others and criticism of it would be fair.
I mean I think the combat and AI is up there with MGS 5 and the encounter variety is insane. Survivor difficulty also perfeclty balances resources with exploration making it feel really necessary to explore in order to fair better in encounters. Even many streamers who are roasting the story say they really enjoyed gameplay.
Nah, controls are way too cumbersome to be compared to MGSV. And the AI is too much of a cheat as well. I said it in the other thread, but the game really hates you attempting stealth runs. In actual stealth games, enemies have set patrol patterns and react to the players actions and sounds. In TLOU, the enemy AI is basically magnetically attracted to you. It doesn't matter how good you are at sneaking, the enemy AI will always manage to converge on your location. This made for some frustrating playthroughs in the first half of the game as I attempted to do as much of a non-lethal run as I could.
I would sneak past enemy encounters totally unseen without killing any sentient human. This led to many restarts because of the problems with the AI. The game really does not want you attempting this, so every success felt like a big win to me as I felt like I was beating the game at its own game. But this was achieved in spite of the game, not because enemy AI and combat is so well done.
Interesting, seems to me you played the game in a very concretely stealthy way whereas for me the last of us succeeds best with frantic combat where you move in and out of stealth. I guess I would be upset too if the game didn't cater to my playstyle but I will say I completely snuck by 3 encounters with little to no problem and no casualties. This was on survivors as well and I didn't feel like enemies gravitated at all. As a matter of fact often times enemies would walk so far away from me I would completely lose where they were and could maneuver by.
When combat gets frantic the multifaceted vertical level design is at its best because you aren't afraid to move quickly between all the interwoven routes. It also forces you to make really quick choices about your resources when enemies corner you. Add this to prone, squeeze throughs, dodge, improved melee, and outstanding AI (I guess you disagre because of pathing but I see most people praise it here and on streams) and I think its a fantastic evolution of the first game. As for cumbersome I have no idea where that comes from cause I pull some nasty snappy headshots with really quick takedowns with ease and find the game really feels balanced in terms of how quick you move relative to enemies.
I get that I just hope there is at least focus on the gameplay because the talk really seems to all be about the story.
I play the way you're talking in the back-half of the game for story reasons which is how the game wants you to play. It is more enjoyable, but still nothing compared to MGSV.
When you move in and out of stealth I think it is way more tense, challenging, varied (level design and enemy variety - ground zeroes was basically better than anything in MGS5 aside from skullfaces base level wise and helicopters just aren't much fun for enemy variety) and balanced than MGS 5. Mgs 5 gives you many options which is fantastic and the movement is slick as hell but the game never challenges you unless you force yourself to be challenged. The encounters in the last of us lend themselves to a lot more challenge and tight balancing due to the linearity and use of resources. This is especially true on survivors. Not a better STEALTH game than mgs 5, sure.
I completely agree with you, it's an incredible experience. It's been 2 days since i finished the game and i still cant stop thinking about it.
MSN just posted their review, calling it a 'stunning disappointment':
I didn't think MSN reviewed anything, I thought they were just a site that compiled news like the way google links to articles on the chrome home screen on mobile.
You are correct. MSN didn't review it themselves. It is a review from another website that MSN links to.
After 20 hours play, 95 feels like about what I'd give the game so far.
Survivor difficulty feels absolutely perfect, I'm keen on Grounded though for 2nd playthrough in PS5: should be a go by then surely.
Survivor difficulty feels absolutely perfect, I'm keen on Grounded though for 2nd playthrough in PS5: should be a go by then surely.
Forbes: 9,5 / 10
Spoiler alert
www.forbes.com
Spoiler alert
‘The Last Of Us Part 2’ Review (PS4): Dig Two Graves
The Last of Us Part 2 takes what could have been a traditional revenge tale and elevates it into something more.
www.forbes.com
Last edited:
I read the first to paragraphs and it seemed like it was going to go into spoiler territory. be cautious.Forbes: 9,5/10
‘The Last Of Us Part 2’ Review (PS4): Dig Two Graves
The Last of Us Part 2 takes what could have been a traditional revenge tale and elevates it into something more.
Personally I'd give it an 8, so I guess I agree with Gamespot lol. The story is okay but the game is amazing on a technical level.
My biggest issue is the pacing, which is just absolutely atrocious. The game drags a lot and there isn't enough gameplay variety to sustain the runtime. Plus a lot of the sequencing/editing choices are just... odd. Good game though.
My biggest issue is the pacing, which is just absolutely atrocious. The game drags a lot and there isn't enough gameplay variety to sustain the runtime. Plus a lot of the sequencing/editing choices are just... odd. Good game though.