Krayt Dragons and their pearls are a whole thing in Star Wars.My wife is better about turning her brain off with this show, and even she was like 'WTF is that?' This episode almost felt like self-parody.
A rare carve with a 1% chance drop, that's why the hunter was so ecstatic, he had been farming it all nightwhat was the ball the sand people found on the dragon's stomach that made the other sand people jump around in glee?
You forgot Ahsoka. Out of the currently alive characters she would have known Yoda best.
Another side-quest filler episode isn't a great way to start season 2, when the first was just finding its footing at the end.
Nah. Dull main characters (it's really hard to care for a protagonist who hides behind a expressionless mask and talks with an expressionless robotvoice), more obsessed with fan service winks and lore than actual storytelling, some terrible guest performances, season 1 consisted of mostly mediocre or flat-out weak episodes, some wonky CGI and make-up work making it sometimes feel like a (wellmade) fan film and often it can't escape a 'filmed on a sound stage' feeling due to the production technique (which is impressive, but can feel suffocating even in 'open' sets). And it's main draw is a cute McGuffin that in the end is still a McGuffin.
Nah. Dull main characters (it's really hard to care for a protagonist who hides behind a expressionless mask and talks with an expressionless robotvoice), more obsessed with fan service winks and lore than actual storytelling, some terrible guest performances, season 1 consisted of mostly mediocre or flat-out weak episodes, some wonky CGI and make-up work making it sometimes feel like a (wellmade) fan film and often it can't escape a 'filmed on a sound stage' feeling due to the production technique (which is impressive, but can feel suffocating even in 'open' sets). And it's main draw is a cute McGuffin that in the end is still a McGuffin.
There are a lot of fun moments in it, but it's hard to actually care or feel for these characters. I must admit the last three episodes (final two of S1 and first of S2) were a lot better, so I hope the series has finally found it's stride. But it doesn't come close to the fun and charm of TFA, let alone the brilliant storytelling and character development of TLJ. And as TFA and TLJ lay so much groundwork in making me actually care for the ST characters, I even enjoyed TROS more than the majority of The Mandalorian.
Sarlaac juices change a man
Facts, and the soundtrack is better
You could argue that The Mandalorian is really flat in its characterisation and I wouldn't even disagree. But if the show is "neutral", then I'd rate the sequels as "bad."Nah. Dull main characters (it's really hard to care for a protagonist who hides behind a expressionless mask and talks with an expressionless robotvoice), more obsessed with fan service winks and lore than actual storytelling, some terrible guest performances, season 1 consisted of mostly mediocre or flat-out weak episodes, some wonky CGI and make-up work making it sometimes feel like a (wellmade) fan film and often it can't escape a 'filmed on a sound stage' feeling due to the production technique (which is impressive, but can feel suffocating even in 'open' sets). And it's main draw is a cute McGuffin that in the end is still a McGuffin.
There are a lot of fun moments in it, but it's hard to actually care or feel for these characters. I must admit the last three episodes (final two of S1 and first of S2) were a lot better, so I hope the series has finally found it's stride. But it doesn't come close to the fun and charm of TFA, let alone the brilliant storytelling and character development of TLJ. And as TFA and TLJ lay so much groundwork in making me actually care for the ST characters, I even enjoyed TROS more than the majority of The Mandalorian.
Far much better than the new trilogy, even though i enjoyed it.
Nah. Dull main characters (it's really hard to care for a protagonist who hides behind a expressionless mask and talks with an expressionless robotvoice), more obsessed with fan service winks and lore than actual storytelling, some terrible guest performances, season 1 consisted of mostly mediocre or flat-out weak episodes, some wonky CGI and make-up work making it sometimes feel like a (wellmade) fan film and often it can't escape a 'filmed on a sound stage' feeling due to the production technique (which is impressive, but can feel suffocating even in 'open' sets). And it's main draw is a cute McGuffin that in the end is still a McGuffin.
There are a lot of fun moments in it, but it's hard to actually care or feel for these characters. I must admit the last three episodes (final two of S1 and first of S2) were a lot better, so I hope the series has finally found it's stride. But it doesn't come close to the fun and charm of TFA, let alone the brilliant storytelling and character development of TLJ. And as TFA and TLJ lay so much groundwork in making me actually care for the ST characters, I even enjoyed TROS more than the majority of The Mandalorian.
The characters and storytelling are what makes TLJ great though. It truly understands the power of internal conflict, and pushes every character to readjust their believes and go through change. It has some flaws, but the writing is spot on.I like TFA somewhat but characters and storytelling is what makes me really dislike TLJ. And TROS is just a bad mess of a movie.
You could argue that The Mandalorian is really flat in its characterisation and I wouldn't even disagree. But if the show is "neutral", then I'd rate the sequels as "bad."
None of the characters in ST are actually interesting, apart from Fin who got sidelined after the first movie and never recovered. So yeah I think I'd have to agree with the OP: The Mandalorian (and Clone Wars S7) easily remain the best new Star Wars media since Disney bought Lucasfilm.
Agrees except for TROS bit, that "film" is the lowest trash possible.
I can't believe I got to see a Krayt Dragon. I have been waiting since 2003 for someone to put one on my TV screen.
Edit: Also, how are people second guessing the Boba Fett cliffhanger? It is the same actor as Jango Fett.
I can't believe I got to see a Krayt Dragon. I have been waiting since 2003 for someone to put one on my TV screen.
Edit: Also, how are people second guessing the Boba Fett cliffhanger? It is the same actor as Jango Fett.
Edit: Also, how are people second guessing the Boba Fett cliffhanger? It is the same actor as Jango Fett.
I finally got around to watching this. I give it a 7. The action was cool but jeesh the dialogue is pretty rough. While looking at the model the raiders had created to plan the attack, Olyphant is like "what are the bones?" and Mando explains it is to represent the Dragon. Never mind that the bones literally look like a Dragon and wtf else would it be they are all trying to kill a dragon lmao.
People who bash the show for not having a ton of depth or character development (for our Mando) must've forgotten or ignore the fact that the show is HEAVILY influenced, or just IS - a spaghetti western. The fact that this dude has a name is depth for that genre :P
Star Wars delving into other genres of storytelling is pretty much exactly what the doctor ordered, IMO.
I'm loving it. Can't wait for more.
It's so painfully obvious lol.Yep. This is a serialized western with direct influences from the golden age of television.
I wonder what in Favreau filmography made people think we are getting super in depth character writing and plot lmao.It's so painfully obvious lol.
"It doesn't have depth like Game of Thrones so it's bad".
Derp.
Yup. My favorite movie of all time "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" Eastwood wears the exact stoic expression for nearly 3 hours. This is a Western, and unapologetically soPeople who bash the show for not having a ton of depth or character development (for our Mando) must've forgotten or ignore the fact that the show is HEAVILY influenced, or just IS - a spaghetti western. The fact that this dude has a name is depth for that genre :P
Star Wars delving into other genres of storytelling is pretty much exactly what the doctor ordered, IMO.
I'm loving it. Can't wait for more.
Did you know its possible to like one thing without shitting on another? Pretty crazy, I know!
The Mandalorian AND the Sequel Trilogy rock. And if you don't like one, that's fine, but don't try to derail a thread with stupid, baited nonsense.
Exactly! Also absolutely love that movie, so we're probably enjoying Mando on the same wavelength.Yup. My favorite movie of all time "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" Eastwood wears the exact stoic expression for nearly 3 hours. This is a Western, and unapologetically so
TROS really did shit the bed, as most characters did start out kinda interesting.I disagree, a lot. The ST characters have struggles and flaws to relate to and overcome, which makes them way more compelling to follow. I agree there was more potential in Finn as a turned Stormtrooper, but I found his arc of finding a cause to fight for quite compelling (TROS shit the bed in not following up on it). Rey is a compelling 'hero's journey' character that gets pushed through the right conflicts to make you root and care for her, Kylo is a more interesting and rounded bad guy than Vader, ... Poe was flat as hell in TFA, but they made him interesting in TLJ by confronting the image he (and we) have of heroism.
Next to that, the ST is creatively on a whole other level, with way better direction, way better cinematography, way better performances. Some parts of The Mandalorian S1 feels flat-out fan-film-like (doesn't help it is stuffed with winks and easter eggs that feel pandering it best). It often fails at telling fun stories too, because it's seems more preoccupied with providing lore and worldbuilding (which should only be in service of a story, not the story itself) than actual story. The show is servicable for now, with quality going up in the latter episodes (which makes me hopefull for this season). And of course it's unfair to compare a tv-show to a huge budget film trilogy, but for now The Mandalorian for now mostly fails at what it sets out to do: telling good, serialised stories in the Star Wars universe.
I think one thing working against Mando in this comparison is that while the leads in spaghetti westerns were pretty thinly written, guys like Eastwood and Van Cleef and Nero could exude a lot of charisma and badassery with just a look. Mando has a helmet working against him in that regard; the armor has to carry the charisma more than the man underneath it.People who bash the show for not having a ton of depth or character development (for our Mando) must've forgotten or ignore the fact that the show is HEAVILY influenced, or just IS - a spaghetti western. The fact that this dude has a name is depth for that genre :P
Yeah it's insane. The first season looked good, but villager + Tusken Raider team up against the dragon was just incredible for a tv show. When Mando and Cobb take off with their attacks to confront the dragon head on, I was just going, holy fuck, it is going down.I'm also just so BLOWN AWAY with the level of special effects we are seeing in a television show. These are modern day cinematic effects you would find in a $250 million blockbuster. George Lucas has got to be so proud of ILM. This level was his personal holy grail he tried to get to with live action television but never quite got there.
Go ahead and back up the truck full of Next year's technical Emmy awards to Lucasfilm's door.
Both can be equally good.
I'm straight but I'd definitely let him into my olypants.Timothy Olyphant looks like he's aged into current Pierce Brosnan.
True - but I DO think the armor/his mannerisms exude that charisma. He's a badass.TFA and TLJ are the best things to happen to Star Wars since ESB (Return of the Jedi is my favorite but it is technically a weaker movie), and that includes everything to come after them too.
I was somewhat neutral on Mando's first season, liking some episodes and feeling nothing about others. But I really liked this premiere. Timothy Olyphant looks like he's aged into current Pierce Brosnan. I hope he sticks around for more eps.
I think one thing working against Mando in this comparison is that while the leads in spaghetti westerns were pretty thinly written, guys like Eastwood and Van Cleef and Nero could exude a lot of charisma and badassery with just a look. Mando has a helmet working against him in that regard; the armor has to carry the charisma more than the man underneath it.
Yeah it's insane. The first season looked good, but villager + Tusken Raider team up against the dragon was just incredible for a tv show. When Mando and Cobb take off with their attacks to confront the dragon head on, I was just going, holy fuck, it is going down.