Because AAA doesn't end there? So, would it have been better if there were no new FPS? Even with the new FPS there are other genres that got new games.
No, it would've been better if the AAA-budget spotlight wasn't filled with literally nothing but shooters.
I know a lot of people are disagreeing with the OP here, but he has a point. There are large gaps within certain genres. Examples:
where are all the arcade racers? Remember when we had so many to choose from -- Burnout, NFS, PGR, Rallisport Challenge, Ridge Racer, Flatout, F-Zero, WipEout and so many more of course.
extreme sports games? We have... Steep, and... uh... a few indie games that don't hit the mark of the 2000s peak.
- no SSX, 1080, Amped, Wave Race, NBA AND NFL Street, NFL Blitza MX/ATV games (to be fair, this series still exists), Tony Hawk, BMX, the list goes on.
hell, lack of competition in the sports genre in general
character action games? We have Bayonetta and DMC has only just come back. Outside of those two, we only get Action RPG hybrids like Nier and Nioh these days.
3D Platformers? Better now because of indies, but still not close to late 90s/early 2000s
RTS? Don't really follow this genre as much, but how is it looking these days?
Sims? Same as above. Seems like only Cities: Skylines is around
So yes, there is more variety now in a certain capacity, but if you think every genre is doing better than ever then I honestly think you're mistaken.
This is a great post.
The fact that people say 'just play more indies' is exactly the point that's being missed. More genres used to be represented more or less equally in the AAA capacity. But now, as AAA-budget games become higher, the more those games will begin to resemble shooters.
This 'there's more variety now' argument is completely bogus.