What the American establishment always does: start a war.
What the American establishment always does: start a war.
RIght, but to have targets of extreme importance over there during this present time, on the surface, makes no sense.
He lead a militia that helped fight ISIL in Iraq.
Well, he hasn't done anything like this before. He's just de facto declared war on Iran with no congressional, NATO or UN approval assuming the US really has drone striked the head of Iran's armed forces. Even W didn't have the stones for that.Did we ever expect the dumbass in chief to respond accordingly?
They probably just thought Trump wouldn't be insane enough to do what he just did.RIght, but to have targets of extreme importance over there during this present time, on the surface, makes no sense.
This is not going to do what Trump wants it to do.starting a war with Iran will also slow and maybe kill any movement Democrats had with the impeachment.
RIght, but to have targets of extreme importance over there during this present time, on the surface, makes no sense.
One, it's unlikely there will be any war with Iran. Two, it would have zero to do with impeachment.starting a war with Iran will also slow and maybe kill any movement Democrats had with the impeachment.
Not sure, but Wars are good for the POTUS approval ratings. One of the fears was Trump in desperation would force a conflict.After years of following trump I gotta ask:
Does this benefit Russia in anyway?
The guy was was a terrorist and assassin. The US should never have escalated at all but no RIP for him. RIP to all the innocents that will pay the price for this.
We just assassinated their top military officer, and the #3 in their government. Declaring war is but a formality at this pointOne, it's unlikely there will be any war with Iran. Two, it would have zero to do with impeachment.
He was a general in their head of their CIA (kinda).The guy was was a terrorist and assassin. The US should never have escalated at all but no RIP for him. RIP to all the innocents that will pay the price for this.
I'm not sure there's enough information yet to make assumptions about the extremely important question of who is behind this
Well, that was fast.
I mean they have already been acting aggressively, they know what a war would do to their country.This is a legitimate act of war. Iran will respond aggressively 100%
Iran has absolutely zero to gain in any military conflict with the US. I have no doubt there will be a retaliation, but that is not the same as war.We just assassinated their top military officer, and the #3 in their government. Declaring war is but a formality at this point
US forces more generally, yes.
Exactly, why the FUCK are people here sympathizing with this motherfucker. Who shot 1000+ protesters in Iran last month? The Revolutionary Guards. Escalation isn't smart and so many innocents will die but well I don't give a fuck that he's dead.
Wait, do you have a source on this? I can't find anything.
You must have missed the post.I think you're missing the point. No one is grieving for this guy. It's not about him, it's about what his death means if the US are responsible, which appears to be the case.
I'd wait until we get another source on Naaem Qasem's death, before we treat it like the gospel. I'm currently watching Al Mayadeen (Lebanese based news channel), and they have yet to say anything on his death. Still talking about Qasem Soleimani.
Soleimani's death alone is going to caus a shitshow but if Hezbollah's Deputy leader is also dead, this is going to become a nightmare. Neither Hezbollah or Iran will take this while sitting down.
There were 7.Doesn't the OP say it was the deputy head of Hashed al-Shaabi, and not Hezbollah? Or were there three targets in this?
Who is this aimed at, trumpers? Or is this some sort of bizarre Hillary sHe tOlD U crowing that is going on elsewhere in the thread?donald trump is anti-establishment who isn't cozy with the military industrial complex, or so i hear
Iran has absolutely zero to gain in any military conflict with the US. I have no doubt there will be a retaliation, but that is not the same as war.
I think you're missing the point. No one is grieving for this guy. It's not about him, it's about what his death means if the US are responsible, which appears to be the case.