Haven't seen the interview but it can be interpreted both ways.
Haven't seen the interview but it can be interpreted both ways.
Sessions is the only one willing to call his bluff it seems (and I'm so conflicted on how to feel about that).Pruitt should have stayed, Call the bluff trump won't fire him publicly. womp womp
I rationalize it this way: any AG would be a piece of shit, but at least Sessions's presence protects Mueller.Sessions is the only one willing to call his bluff it seems (and I'm so conflicted on how to feel about that).
I know that feel bro :(Sessions is the only one willing to call his bluff it seems (and I'm so conflicted on how to feel about that).
No, I agree, ultimately him protecting Mueller is worth it, I think. I say this as a straight white male, and might feel differently were I Hispanic.I rationalize it this way: any AG would be a piece of shit, but at least Sessions's presence protects Mueller.
No, I agree, ultimately him protecting Mueller is worth it, I think. I say this as a straight white male, and might feel differently were I anything not white and straight.
Also pretty significant tonight -- prosecutors are explicitly saying "collusion" won't come up at trial but that there will be a Trump connection: Steve Calk lending Manafort $16 million to get a job in campaign/White House http://wapo.st/2zgTGPH
6:54 PM - Jul 6, 2018
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c7aa4e-7006-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.htmlSome White House officials worry that Putin, who has held several calls with Trump, plays on the president's inexperience and lack of detailed knowledge about issues while stoking Trump's grievances.
The Russian president complains to Trump about "fake news" and laments that the U.S. foreign policy establishment — the "deep state" in Putin's words — is conspiring against them, the first senior U.S. official said.
"It's not us," Putin has told Trump, the official summarized. "It's the subordinates fighting against our friendship."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c7aa4e-7006-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html
Putin's pretty good at this.
I mean, he is playing on easy mode.https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c7aa4e-7006-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html
Putin's pretty good at this.
ugggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c7aa4e-7006-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html
Putin's pretty good at this.
hahahaahahaahahahaahahhaahahahahaDelightful, hilarious article about the AZ GOP Senate primary. I howled the entire way through.
Chemtrail Kelli has started dragging McSally, whose "above-the-fray-moderate" mask has begun to slip:
McSally only leads because Chemtrail and Arpaio have split the crazy vote:
Nobody buys McSally's attempts to Gillespie herself:
She still won't say whether she voted for Trump:
And Sinema has her shook.
In an interview on Thursday, Mr. Fitzgerald said that he was not surprised the Republican Party had disavowed his candidacy because both major political parties in America are run by "Jewish elitists."
The essence of "both sides"-ism's intellectual depth.
The Democrat is pro-life and against gay marriage and the ACA so you'd think the Republicans would be more than fine with endorsing him, but the party label is strong with this one. (He almost lost to an underdog progressive primary challenger and is probably toast in 2020)It's good they unendorsed him, but could they endorse the democrat to beat him? Or is a democrat equal to a holocaust denier.
We're talking about another Nazi in California.The Democrat is pro-life and against gay marriage and the ACA so you'd think the Republicans would be more than fine with endorsing him, but the party label is strong with this one. (He almost lost to an underdog progressive primary challenger and is probably toast in 2020)
With trespassing.
It's good they unendorsed him, but could they endorse the democrat to beat him? Or is a democrat equal to a holocaust denier.
Sounds like you're thinking of another Holocaust denier who won the GOP nomination for a Congressional seat (because of course there are several), namely the guy going up against Lipinski in Illinois.The Democrat is pro-life and against gay marriage and the ACA so you'd think the Republicans would be more than fine with endorsing him, but the party label is strong with this one. (He almost lost to an underdog progressive primary challenger and is probably toast in 2020)
ugh. I thought I heard something like that, but it's so hard to believe. In a just world this guy would be sweating his future as a politician for something that bad, but I guess he gets a pass because it's so uncivil to accuse people of being somewhat sympathetic to nazis.Well earlier this week Rauner (IL gov) refused to tell people to vote for Lipinski (D) over the Nazi (R). A day or two later Rauner actually had to goose-step that back a bit, though.