Thank you, Bloodarmz. On the subject of that GameXplain list, it does remind me that gaming is a sausage fest, but it's not a
wasteland. Some characters could do better in contemporary times if they were just given the chance.
A bit late on the discussion but I have something to add. Sakurai may say that he recognizes the problem of few female characters being in Smash but that doesn't mean he is willing to make an effort to solve the problem. If we look at the DLC characters for Ultimate there were only 4 female characters added:
- Female Byleth
- Min Min
- Alex
- Pyra/Mythra
This might not look too bad but when you stop and think about it not one of those characters was the result of Sakurai specifically searching for a female character to add to Smash.
Female Byleth and Alex were just convenient alts for the characters he (or Nintendo, I guess, but you can't tell me that Nintendo specifically demanded he put Byleth in Smash. The request was surely just "a main character from 3H" and he picked Male Byleth) actually wanted to add, Min Min got in but Sakurai confirmed that he was unsure whether to add her or Ninjara to represent ARMS and it was the ARMS director that convinced him to pick her in the end.
Many have complained that Sakurai missed the perfect chance to add a black character to Smash and that isn't a good look for him, but to me the even more damning revelation is that in the ONE OCCASION he had to cherry pick any character he wanted (because none of them were particularly popular) he didn't make a rule for himself like "I will limit my options to just the women of the roster".
And with Pyra/Mythra he also admitted that he wanted to make the fighter Rex w/ Pyra initially but couldn't because of technical limitation. It was technical limitations the lead to Pyra/Mythra, not Sakurai wanting to add female characters.
It's not bad enough that we only got 2 slots in the DLC dedicated to female characters. Even those only happened because of either technical limitations, or Sakurai letting another person choose for him. Based on this evidence this doesn't look like a man who is passionate about adding female characters to Smash.
I love Sakurai, he is a genius and has a lot of good qualities but he honestly doesn't care much about issues of representation and we have to accept it.
At this point we need to hope that a Nintendo higher up will specifically request him to add some specific characters that are women/PoC in the next Smash OR that he won't be the one to make the next Smash.
It's one or the other.
I refrained from mentioning
Ultimate because it was a backslide from Sakurai's earlier comments (and the waters of who picked who were muddied, though within the confines Sakurai mentioned, he didn't always go for options most ideal for our specific concerns). People noticed how bad
Ultimate got with the series' gender ratio because of the desert of female picks between 2018 and early 2020. The ballooning roster count and folks like Neoxon busting out hard data to bring the disparity into stark view made fans realize that
Smash had somehow gotten worse than the already low numbers circa 2014.
I won't psychoanalyze the man because I don't know him, but there is definitely a rigidity to how Sakurai picks/approves characters. Prominence and moveset potential seem to rule over everything else. He can and will subvert things as he deems necessary -- see Lucina and Robin over Chrom, or Min Min and hypothetically Ninjara over designated poster boy Spring Man -- but those are the exceptions, not the rule. That's not to say he doesn't take things like aesthetics, personality, and fandom into consideration, but he defers to the legacy franchise's poster children 90% of the time, which means overwhelmingly male characters are chosen and further advertised within the platform fighter's own sphere.
Smash is as much a participant in this industry's own trends as it is a beneficiary/victim of them. So yes, Sakurai or anyone else would need to actually take other factors into consideration when selecting characters for the next rodeo, because the industry won't change fast enough on its own terms to begin alleviating the representation problems.
Smash Bros. is a museum, and a very impressive one at that. But museums curate, which means they're a reflection of the tastemakers', well, tastes. That can be good and bad, and yeah, sometimes it's arbitrary to the layperson and the professional. Whatever gets included is put on a pedestal, which means whatever doesn't get included can be deemed lesser even when the curators don't mean to do so. At some point, I did want to comment on the two slots for female characters in
Ultimate's DLC. It's oddly telling that they came from Nintendo's own stable. There's no shortage of popular/iconic female third-party characters, they just never made it to the final round of selection. If you took
Smash Bros. as the sole arbiter of franchise/character importance -- and you shouldn't, Sakurai wouldn't want that, but let's pretend for the sake of argument -- you'd think series like
Tomb Raider,
Puyo Puyo,
Atelier, and
Touhou Project left no mark on the industry whatsoever. I can extend that observation to the lack of darker-skinned POC leads in
Smash when some
do exist elsewhere and are as theoretically viable as anyone else. Or non-Japanese franchises. Or PC games. This series is a work in progress in many ways (some more important than others), and I'd imagine Nintendo is satisfied but not permanently so with its current state.
Sometimes, you (not
you you, but the people in the industry) just need to look at a situation from a different angle and see what may be missing.