You mean it did make it look good
whose bright idea was it for a edgy Pan origin story
It wouldn't be so bad if it's wasn't so standard plot wise and almost parody of those shitty edgy origins
Wkd Box Office - 12•29-31•17 - One, Two, Jumanji's coming for you
- Thread starter kswiston
- Start date
- Status
whose bright idea was it for a edgy Pan origin story
It wouldn't be so bad if it's wasn't so standard plot wise and almost parody of those shitty edgy origins
"A lot" means Harrington, Clarke and Turner? :P
It's true, the script on GoT isn't top notch (it isn't awful either), but most of the other actors have risen above it. They just aren't good actors. Personally, I would actually put Harrington way below Clarke even. Dude's just awful.
I am going to do a prequel to cinderilla and work in Freak on a leash by korn
Not with that interesting setting
... to flop
Thought that was going to be Ant Man, now I think Marvel films are no longer capable of bombing.
They've evolved past that weakness that affects lesser mortal brands.
Why didn';t they sell the first one a jumnji sequel? Dex Shepard couldn't carry it alone
Do we lump Inhumans in with the MCU films since the pilot had a theatrical showing, or do we dump it with their TV fare since it was technically a TV series?
MCU is able to take characters that the general audience does not care about or have no clue exist and make them marketable and a success.
Lump it in with a pile of shit.
Scott Buck to make a Night Thrasher film. Slayven's head explodes.
How was he allowed to touch anything
(I know the real reason because both iron fist and inhuman were rushed and he was available )
He sure does. At least most of the stuff on Netflix is solid.
If Inhumans hadn't been a fucking mess, and that limited IMAX run had made bank, it would be (rightfully) lumped in with the rest of their financial successes, despite that it was a production under Perlmutter's purview, and not Feige's. But it wasn't. At all. it's the biggest creative failure Marvel Studios has produced under its own banner, and I'm fairly certain it's their biggest financial one too.
That we're knowledgeable enough about the division of labor in the company to make those distinctions doesn't really mean those distinctions are all that worthwhile. It's still a Marvel Studios production. Marvel was in creative control, Marvel spent the money... Marvel made THAT with it.
(It's sorta like how I like to say "Clone Wars doesn't count" when we talk about Star Wars theatrical releases but it absolutely does so I'm full of shit)
That we're knowledgeable enough about the division of labor in the company to make those distinctions doesn't really mean those distinctions are all that worthwhile. It's still a Marvel Studios production. Marvel was in creative control, Marvel spent the money... Marvel made THAT with it.
(It's sorta like how I like to say "Clone Wars doesn't count" when we talk about Star Wars theatrical releases but it absolutely does so I'm full of shit)
At least they are keeping things relatively tame budget wise on the TV front outside of Inhumans.
When do New Warriors and Cloak and Dagger start?
When do New Warriors and Cloak and Dagger start?
Cloak and Dagger is planned for this year. We have no clue on New Warriors. It didn't get picked up by Freeform and I think Disney is still trying to figure out what to do with it.
Maybe. I'm going to give her a couple more chances before I make a conclusion. The Solo movie I will feel will be the biggest indicator since I think Disney movies are so focus-tested.
Give the inhumans rights back to Marvel!
Actually I want them to make that crappy show non canon and reboot it under Feige's guidance like it was supposed to happen.
Actually I want them to make that crappy show non canon and reboot it under Feige's guidance like it was supposed to happen.
They definitely have no interest in Inhumans, that was a Ike want and they really don't need it anymore except for Kamala
OP
OP
All of those shows are non-canon when it comes down to it.
I doubt they are touching for a while especially when they can say mutants soon
Lucasfilm productions aren't focus tested at all.
I mean, outside of Kathleen Kennedy/Kiri Hart/Alan Horn/Bob Iger, but that's not what you'd really call a "focus group"
So you're saying if Daredevil, Punisher, Runaways, etc were to come to the big screen they would just ignore everything that happened in the shows? I'm not sure about that. AoS has had a few shares of referencing the movies.
They can do them in 2022 or whatever, after mutants have been established. Just do them right. They got me interested in inhumans only to throw the worst show of all time in my face.
OP
OP
The shows can reference the movies, but Age of Ultron pretty much demonstrated how much even Agents of Shield matters in the larger scheme of the films.
If Daredevil, Punisher, etc ever come to the MCU movies, they will completely ditch whatever the Netflix versions were doing, yes.
Its a shame. Vincent D'Onofrio is a great Kingpin.
Would kill to see him in a Spidey film.
So when is the Black Panther salt controversy starting? I thought Fox News would've been on that shit already
As great as Daredevil and Punisher have been on Netflix, it would be a tough sell if Marvel put them on the big screen to carry a film (unless they make a small cameo).
Have to entice the masses to handover their cash on something different than what can be see on Netflix. All new versions that ditch any connection to their previous Netflix run.
Have to entice the masses to handover their cash on something different than what can be see on Netflix. All new versions that ditch any connection to their previous Netflix run.
It's been awhile since I watched Age of Ultron, what exactly are you referring to?
I would be okay with them doing it that way, make it simpler. I actually hope Daredevil will show up in Homecoming 2.
They need the inhumans if they want to do Illuminati and World War Hulk.
- Status