• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

bar_bar12

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
2,439
Both two highly notorious and controversial. Both high profile series. Both were a try to take the series in a darker direction and were divisive. Which do you think was worse?

In other news, two weeks left until DMC5.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,972
Devil May Cry's reboot never even got a sequel, whereas Tomb Raider's got two.

While I personally can't stand Nu-Lara or the general tone or writing of the reboot TR series, the games were at least successful enough to stick around this long. DmC couldn't even manage a single follow-up before Capcom panicked and went back to the OG series.
 

Green Mario

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,319
I don't think either of them are bad, but if I could only play one or the other, I'd pick DmC over Tomb Raider every time.
 

vestan

#REFANTAZIO SWEEP
Member
Dec 28, 2017
24,672
If I had to pick, Tomb Raider.

Then again, I'm not really a huge Tomb Raider guy so there's a bit of bias there.
 

requiem

Member
Dec 3, 2017
1,448
Tomb Raider 2013 was really good. Unfortunately I feel the trilogy veered miles off track by leaning too much into open world bloat and a weird, tonally-bizarre focus on violence. The Lara orgasm sounds also increasingly became a problem, to the point where I had to switch to headphones when playing SOTTR because my wife thought I was watching porn.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,972
Tomb Raider 2013 was really good. Unfortunately I feel the trilogy veered miles off track by leaning too much into open world bloat and a weird, tonally-bizarre focus on violence. The Lara orgasm sounds also increasingly became a problem, to the point where I had to switch to headphones when playing SOTTR because my wife thought I was watching porn.

The violence is the thing that bugs me the most about the nu-TR games. When I think Tomb Raider, I don't think "Lara Croft jamming a climbing axe into people's spinal columns six hundred times", yet apparently that's Crystal Dynamics' vision for the series nowadays...?
 

Strangelove_77

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,392
They're both good mechanically but DmC is awful at everything else. Tomb Raider is just kind of bland.
 

ket

Member
Jul 27, 2018
13,005
Both two highly notorious and controversial. Both high profile series. Both were a try to take the series in a darker direction and were divisive. Which do you think was worse?

In other news, two weeks left until DMC5.

Outside of Era or fan forums, the reboot TR games weren't controversial at all.
 

Finaika

Member
Dec 11, 2017
13,396
Tomb Raider 2013 was really good. Unfortunately I feel the trilogy veered miles off track by leaning too much into open world bloat and a weird, tonally-bizarre focus on violence. The Lara orgasm sounds also increasingly became a problem, to the point where I had to switch to headphones when playing SOTTR because my wife thought I was watching porn.
She is not having an orgasm.
 

RagnarokX

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,800
Devil May Cry's reboot never even got a sequel, whereas Tomb Raider's got two.

While I personally can't stand Nu-Lara or the general tone or writing of the reboot TR series, the games were at least successful enough to stick around this long. DmC couldn't even manage a single follow-up before Capcom panicked and went back to the OG series.
But the difference was mostly fan reaction.

A big part of Tomb Raider's success came from people who didn't like the old games, so that's not a good sign for being a good reboot.
 

Jangowuzhere

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,505
DmC was a proper hack and slash game in the same vein as previous Devil May Cry titles.

Tomb Raider was a violent shooter that had little in common with previous games.
 

Rendering...

Member
Oct 30, 2017
19,089
DmC was like an experiment to find out what would happen if you took the exceptional gameplay and endearing self-aware goofiness of the series and let a tasteless and unqualified studio do their own take on it.

Predictably, it's a nasty stupid mess full of laughably inept design and writing, and shockingly subpar gameplay. Everything from the animation to the sound design is inferior.

That the so-called Definitive Edition was remedial rather than supplementary like past DMC special editions says a lot.

Which was greater: the sniper rifle abortion, or the limp attacks that ape classic DMC combos without conveying anything close to the same force or dynamic feedback?

Trick question. It's the part where Vergil talks to his brother about his penis.

DmC was a proper hack and slash game in the same vein as previous Devil May Cry titles.

Tomb Raider was a violent shooter that had little in common with previous games.
In the same vein the same way Spam is in the same vein as Kobe beef.
 
Last edited:

Tangyn

Member
Oct 29, 2017
2,281
Also I may have been ignorant but I had no idea there was loads of people who hated DMC with such venom until I joined up to the other forum years later.
 

Linus815

Member
Oct 29, 2017
19,831
Both two highly notorious and controversial. Both high profile series. Both were a try to take the series in a darker direction and were divisive. Which do you think was worse?

In other news, two weeks left until DMC5.

The TR reboot was not controversial at all. It was a very highly rated game by both critics and users and ended up being the best selling TR game. Rise was also similiarly well received.
 

Pipyakas

Member
Jul 20, 2018
549
While DmC never got a sequel, I can see it gets better simply by looking at the Definitive Edition.
The writing is still... questionable, but it plays well, and that's something I cannot say about both TR's sequels. They just get very, very boring on both fronts
 

RagnarokX

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,800
The TR reboot was not controversial at all. It was a very highly rated game by both critics and users and ended up being the best selling TR game. Rise was also similiarly well received.
TR certainly was controversial. They changed a platforming series into a third person shooter and came up with an even worse story and characterization for Lara than their previous reboot with Lara having to get trapped on murder rape island and hating tombs to "become the tomb raider". Ther was also the comments from the devs about wanting players to "want to protect Lara." Third person shooting and cinematic setpieces are just super popular so the people that prefer platforming got drowned out.
 
May 18, 2018
588
I didn't even know people hated the Tomb Raider reboot. The death uh...scenes were absolutely someone's fetish but that's was all I heard about.

The DmC reboot was only controversial because gamer nerds and journalist nerds wanted to be right about video games. People that wanted DMC just didn't play it and people that didn't care enjoyed it. I didn't play it because it wasn't the game I wanted.
 

ffvorax

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,855
DmC, I really disliked the gameplay... the art was good, the character where... not so good.
TR is a decent reboot, first one was really good, the second one was so-so.
 

Rendering...

Member
Oct 30, 2017
19,089
Also I may have been ignorant but I had no idea there was loads of people who hated DMC with such venom until I joined up to the other forum years later.
And all it took was the devs pointedly mocking fans over several months and talking a big game only to deliver a product full of amateurish issues that the series never had before, DMC2 aside.

When the designers don't even know basic stuff like how to give enemies proper visual and sound cues for each attack, or that enemies with visible weapons on their bodies should actually use them, because form follows function, you've got a problem.

Imagine giving the premier stylish action series of its time to people who had never before made an action game with better combat than Heavenly Sword. Mind boggling.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
DmC is worst, not because of gameplay, but because the developer when out of their way to make fun of the original DMC while being homophobic.
 

TissueBox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,059
Urinated States of America
Tomb Raider supercedes TLOU as one of the best AAA action packages of its year and DmC is the series at its most generally evocative in my opinion, so I have to decry the insinuation that they are poor reboots... but out of those two, Tomb Raider. At least DmC's story is full of enjoyable and meaningful schlock. Tomb Raider was a mess in that regard, even with noble intent in tow.
 

Linus815

Member
Oct 29, 2017
19,831
TR certainly was controversial. They changed a platforming series into a third person shooter and came up with an even worse story and characterization for Lara than their previous reboot with Lara having to get trapped on murder rape island and hating tombs to "become the tomb raider". Ther was also the comments from the devs about wanting players to "want to protect Lara." Third person shooting and cinematic setpieces are just super popular so the people that prefer platforming got drowned out.

Controversy maybe in a small part of the core hardcore TR fanbase, but on the large scale of things, it was one of the most beloved games of 2013.
Fact is, the mid 2000's trilogy had poor sales and the series was clearly running out of steam, and TR was becoming irrelevant.
TR2013 brought the series back from a huge slumber and made the franchise mainstream again.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/203160/Tomb_Raider/
https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/tomb-raider


Meanwhile this is how the last "classic" TR did:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/8140/Tomb_Raider_Underworld/
https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/tomb-raider-underworld
 

Simon-chan

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,044
Italy
I'm gonna go with DmC. There's a reason we never got a sequel.
Tomb Raider, as unremarkable as it is, is slightly better.
 

Zaied

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,575
Tomb Raider was a great game, so I wouldn't qualify it in a discussion of 'worst' reboots. All things considered, it's really impressive what Crystal Dynamics managed to do with it, given that they were tasked with rebooting Tomb Raider twice in a 7 year span.
 

RagnarokX

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,800
Controversy maybe in a small part of the core hardcore TR fanbase, but on the large scale of things, it was one of the most beloved games of 2013.
Fact is, the mid 2000's trilogy had poor sales and the series was clearly running out of steam, and TR was becoming irrelevant.
TR2013 brought the series back from a huge slumber and made the franchise mainstream again.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/203160/Tomb_Raider/
https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/tomb-raider


Meanwhile this is how the last "classic" TR did:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/8140/Tomb_Raider_Underworld/
https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/tomb-raider-underworld
None of the Crystal Dynamics games are "classic". They've always focused too hard on action and setpieces. The second reboot double down.
 

Nimby

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,223
Never played DmC, but TR2013 is the best the series has been since the PS1. Angel of Darkness was crap, Legend and Underworld were fine but actually signaled the move to more automated gameplay and linear setpiece driven levels before the reboot trilogy. The series has actually improved upon those games significantly with better gameplay all around.

And the stories were still garbage. The PS1 games may be in-offensive with their narratives, but god Legend/Underworld were the lowest points for stories in the series.