So that's a no on holding the L then because it's easier to just accuse everyone having fun with the game as being biased. Let's go with
It doesn't matter if the game sells XP boosts or not.
Really? Honestly I'm not even surprised.
This right here is exactly why the game is tuned this way.
AC:Origins had a trainer and Ubisoft didn't care, in fact, they released something much more controllable and polished than a trainer for free:
You literally just asked me to consider that an OT is biased. You refuse to acknowledge that the majority of opinions don't align with your assumptions.
Even if that way was meant to push you towards MTX even though you already bought the game?
I think overleveling was a problem with Witcher 3, not being underleveled. Atleast if you do side content too, never played it just by rushing the main story. It was somewhat common complaint too from what I remember. That's why they patched in the option for enemy-level scaling probably. Though it came way late, around the time with Blood & Wine expansion.
I was talking about the people who say they did buy the game, there. If you don't have the time to play a huge game, or aren't interested in doing any side content at all I don't know why you'd buy a game like this, is what I'm saying. It's not like there's a shortage of great smaller games to play, and if you really want to do play this anyway you don't need to finish it in a week or anything.
looks like someone doesn't know what selection bias means, lol
There are many things involved, not just copyright laws. And Ubisoft is French, not from the USA. Laws change around the world.
Then don't buy the time-consuming RPG with one of the biggest AAA open worlds of all time.
This is PC gaming in general, there are trainers for near EVERY game, it's only getting highlighted here because of the "controversy" surrounding this particular game. Hell, I've got a really clean refined app on my PC that's constantly updated with new and old releases and launches the games from Steam, Origin, Uplay whatever. The only time anyone is going to do anything about these is if users are cheating in multiplayer which will get them banned most likely, or if the cheats are being used to obtain paid content which 1. These don't do and 2. Is hard to do because stuff like premium currency is usually server side
i didn't play the game because i can't stand that janky combat, but that game doesn't allow you to purchase experience boosts and in-game resources for real world money, so i don't think that's really a relevant comparison?
All Ubisoft would need to do is make a free XP boost option as an option on Easy level. Everyone else could play just as they are doing right now.
well, it would depend on the exact comparison being made, wouldn't it, so i'll leave it for that poster to clarify what they were trying to say
How is that implying a bias against Ubisoft and not against MTs on principle, you know, like that post LITERALLY says.
You're literally using a minority of players, (some of whom didn't even know about some features in the game like for instance that player who didn't know arrows were craftable), as a response to the question, "Are they the majority of players."
Yet you conveniently ingore that they don't represent the majority of people playing the game.
How is the game more grndy than Origins when you literally on average gain more EXP, loot, and mats while the activities in general are more varied. Have you considered that you confuse "I don't enjoy this gameplay loop" with "I'm grinding."
I mean considering that pretty much everything that came post launch of coming to Odyssey as well I wouldn't be surprised if they once again release a free mod control panel that really lets you fuck with the game. Which is a pretty strong indication about how they feel about such things being in the game.
Don't think they've responded before. Trainers have worked for their earlier games too, like with Origins. And they also released Animus Control Panel for PC then (free). So I'm not expecting them to react to this now. Trainers in PC gaming are common and normal.
It is a design choice, not an issue.
The same reason why it's suddenly shocking that hte game has crafting materials, or that it's suddenly shocking that the game wants you to play side content in an RPG.
Essentially "Me mad about MTs on principle. Youtuber said it grindy, I haven't played but therefor it grindy. Me smart. Me rise up, like all gamers."
I mean i'm sure you've been following these threads and have been following the part where the loudest users arguing it's grindy also straight up admitted to not playing it let alone for a significant amount of time. Like, literally pages ago a guy was saying "I have no arrows, obviously the ame wants me to buy mats. Oh wait wah you can craft arrows?"
i wasn't responding to the question "Are they the majority of players."
It wasn't. In fact, if you decided to do any side content at all, you became overleveled. Kinda the opposite problem, actually. And it was a problem for me because I WANTED to do the side content. I purposefully put off the main campaign because I just wanted to go everywhere and do everything. Had to play on the hardest difficulty possible to try and counter it.
yes, selection bias refers to whether a group as a whole is representative of a larger population
Something being in violation of your Terms of Service is not the same as piracy. Piracy is a violation of copyright law. There's no way to violate copyright law using a trainer. You'd have to steal copyrighted code or assets in order to violate copyright law. You can't commit copyright law by modifying existing code.
So you acknowledge that the people you were quoting were a minority. Got it. Ty fam.
They've said that digital purchases in general have provided a very huge source of revenue while simultaneously requiring less work to implement.
No it isn't because that implies that the main quest is different when it has the same gameplay loop as the side content. It just means you aren't a big fan of the game and it's features. A conversation entirely separate from MTs.
Makes sense, I don't walk into threads of games I have no intentions of ever playing and start criticizing specific aspects of the game that the overwhelming majority of people PLAYING the game are saying "This has not been an issue for me". Is this a hard concept to grasp, first hand experience???
No one is ignoring that shit, I have two suggestions on why it feels that way though:
