Let me get you an answer when I'm at my PC
come on Stan, I need you to give me something here
sure they could, but this instance of it read as genuine to me.
Basically, my reads on VA and Pancakes are switched here, and Random's weirdness I feel has been wiped out by Vere's play the last two days, but I think we mostly agree.
So, I don't really know where to go next after this, either. Pancakes has been sticking out to me today in a way no one else is, but the same could be said of EC yesterday. We could be walking into a bad vote or she might not be the last scum, but I think we're going to have to reassess the whole game with the context of however today plays out to figure this out. Tomorrow might roll around and we have new information from anex or someone unexpected dies. I think we'll have to take this one step at a time right now.
I should note that I was not deciding between those two candidates solely. I looked at others' votes and noticed Pancakes what I would determine to be a unique voting record style. The mode of engagement is largely conciliatory too, so this isn't only about votes for me.
well of the people i put in my towner list Pancakes was the one without a solid reason and more a vibe so i wouldnt really get huffy bout it, but im still gonna vote for VA because its probably VA.
But if you dont agree then
Vote: VA
Oh shit, well its a picture of Stan Lee, and underneath it is another picture of a persons eye lmao.
Isn't consistency incompatible with the stated attributes in the first sentence?
When I say, "Pancakes is wishy-washy, non-committal, and too easily shifts votes" I'm trying to paraphrase what I believe to be Neki's views on Pancakes. I understand how Pancakes is coming to said conclusions, but I don't agree with them. I think the view of inconsistency stems from Pancakes' embrancing of the town core philosophy and working together.
As for this, the question itself makes it sound like this is just one example of consistency, but it's more than that. Whenever Pancakes shifts their views or votes with the group, she is providing another example.
Ok, you hit the heart of my question with the last statement. Do you view Pancakes as inconsistent, or Neki's claims inconsistent with the reality? If the latter, do you think Neki is being careless and coasting on the monkey goodwill? Because there is a considerate amount of effort there on Neki's part, so a poorly constructed take like that would verge on deliberate IMO.
I mostly agree with this, and that's a large part of the reason my vote for Pancakes is not slam dunk. That's why I tried to focus on the vote record alone, not colored by the commentary, to get a more objective view of the turn of play.
I don't think Neki is coasting
But more seriously---it's possible, but I am stuck in my belief that Launch was purposefully left alive because of godfather, of which there is 0% chance we don't have a godfather.
I got tied up in the Neki stuff and honestly didn't see this. I'll go take a look, but it might be a bit before I respond since I've been neglecting work.
I wonder if this is maybe too obvious? Overtly silencing opposition is a risky endeavor. I remember reading back in Thing where I had shared suspicions with my night chat partner and they took that back to scum. Their shared opinion seemed to be they'd try to steer me elsewhere in the thread. I assumed that would be the default preference.
Most people didn't believe Zipped was the doctor, though. That's what makes it such a weird kill.
Yes, I worry about the whole thread tunneling you for town despite how ludicrous the theory is, LOL.
I guess if you've played with Zipped long enough him bread crumbling and soft claiming it didn't really surprise me when he ended up flipping doctor.
