Hey he might be going method.
I'm saying that for a very brief moment in time, Thanos, Hulk and Iron Man were omnipotent. So yes, it's clearly figuratively. You are the one that took it literally. Falcon came from the same portal than Panther, Shuri and Okoye. He isn't from Wakanda, but was snapped there. Same for Wanda, Bucky and Groot, that came up from the same portal I believe. Clearly, I think you understand that "bringing everyone back home" means that Hulk thought about bringing them back relatively safely. It's not a stretch at all when you know the extent of what the six infinity stones can accomplish together.
I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure it was never said that RDJ was outright not renewing his contract with Marvel, just that his contract was up at the end of Endgame. But that had also been true multiple times before (his contract initially ended with Iron Man 3 and he's been reupping on a mostly movie-by-movie basis ever since), and was also true for many of the other cast members: Evans and Hemsworth's contracts technically ran out with Infinity War, but both re-signed for Endgame to see the story through. Oppositely, Scarlett's contract still had at least another movie on it, but that didn't mean Black Widow couldn't be killed off.
But someone like Thor could probably have handled using a single stone or Captain Marvel, Hulk, etc. Just saying, it never made much sense why they didn't try to use the stones independently.
Yeah, I agree with this. She doesn't get "thrown off a cliff," she intentionally sacrifices herself so that others have a chance to undo the death that Thanos unleashed upon the universe. Her sacrifice is right up there with Tony's, the difference being that it happens away from the main battle. But it's still an intentional sacrifice that she chooses to make. That post makes it sound like she just gets pitched off a cliff and dies for no reason, which is really selling her character arc short. She's the first one, and really the only one, to say "I have to die so everyone else may live" (technically Hawkeye does as well in the same scene). Even Tony thinks he's got a chance of surviving snapping Thanos.
The Russo's in EW said:
I didn't. Repeated several times after you got it wrong that I did not. And yet, you are still insisting I did. You are arguing for the sake of arguing, it seems. Can we move on now?
When Cap travelled back to 1946 to live out a normal life with Peggy on that alternate timeline, he could have waited a day (or a day could have passed), and he comes back out the pad he entered, but one day after the day he left the others. And then travelled one day back in time to land on the bench with his gps coordinates. That's the theory Forbes ran with, and would work with the established rule set the movie sets up.
Yes. In-universe that is Tønsberg, where the Tesseract used to be hidden with the cultists at the church. It's also where Odin fought the Frost Giants.
I actually had moved on, which is why I didn't reply to your other post.
The stones only grant "omnipotent" power to the bearer when paired together and used by one person, that has been explained since Infinity War. Thor would certainly survive using it, same for Hulk. Stark never would stand a chance, but yet that's the reality where Strange saw that the Avengers were able to defeat Thanos and revert what he has done.
All 6 OG Avengers each getting a stone to battle fully Gauntlet-ed Thanos would have been sweet.
I found it interesting how that scene is pretty much a post credit scene that sets up the new Guardians dynamic and their possible main focus in the next movie.
I wasn;t referring to the omni-potent power, I was referring to using the stones independent of one another just like Thanos was using them for the majority of Infinity War. I get the whole "that's the reality that Strange saw" but that's a copout because the winning reality could have been whatever the writers decided it to be.
While cool, I was just questioning why someone like Thor wasn't like "Give me the Gauntlet" and used it similar to how Thanos used it in his fight on Titan before collecting all the stones. Certainly could have been feasible but wasn't thought of for whatever reason.
Simply putting on the Gauntlet hurts them. Hulk is in agony before the snap, they would be helpless for a while. There is a power surge in them, same thing happens to Thanos but he can take it better.
Because that was the one future that doctor strange saw succeeding. It was the only way. its pretty obvious
iirc, he rips out the power stone because the gauntlet has one of the those pieces on it preventing it from snapping as well as Carol holding his hand open.
The only reason I can think of it because the writers decided it would be less interesting. Which is ok, but not very practical. Small gripe but not a big deal.
I hope he didn't steal her away from her husband then. (Someone said she mentions she's married in the 50's).
I think people assume he went back further because by the 70s, Peggy was already married with children. Cap coming back at that time would have forced her to abandon her family. Him going back to 1946 means he was the husband and father to the children all along.
Iron Man is too smart for his own good (see: all the things that go wrong because he's trying to help, like Ultron).
Peggy was younger than her 1970s self by the end of the film. Also the location seems like mid fourties, early fifties. My theory is that Cap going back is a time travel conundrum. Peggy's husband was Steve all along, hence why Steve's portrait is still on her desk at SHIELD. Neither really "move on". I wonder if Steve told her about kissing her nephew tho.
The way time travel works in this film, the only way Steve could have been Peggy's husband all along would be if "our" MCU wasn't the first one. Each Peggy would be married to a Steve Rogers from a timeline one "closer" to the universe "prime" (where she never married Steve), and then each Steve would go back in time and marry a Peggy from one universe "further" from the prime universe.
Bingo.
Racist people tend to find something to get angry about no matter what.
