Aye, he's a '...before turning the gun on himself' case waiting to happen.Someone needs to check if ths dude has an assault rifle, ammunition and a manifesto.
It has absolutely nothing to do with WWE, someone was attacked for no reason in clear sight and people who care for said person intervened. Yes one of them took a cheap shot but the dude in question is actually an amateur MMA fighter who was still trying to fight back despite being swarmed by dudes twice his size. He was asking for the response 100%, a few of the guys who jumped in like Teddy Hart and Harry Smith Jr are actually related to Bret as well.Congrats for all of you advocating a restrained person being beat. No wonder I want distance from all this WWE bs. The crowd was clearly happy to witness a lynching.
Man, I dunno. He knocked out a guy who was restrained by at least 5 other people. you can argue whether it was justified to do so but I don't see bragging about it. People that jump into a dangerous situation and put themselves on the line don't do that, but people who jump into a fight towards the end do.LOL, they're already using this... "he's a knock out kind of guy"
Is he just a troll in general or is his modus operandi to look for ways in which he can flout his moral authority?
I'm watching the HOF on the network right now. They haven't cut out the incident.
Shame on this guy in trying to spoil a really nice speech from Bret and Natty.
I don't understand why thugs are allowed to have a free pass on gratuitous violence in the aftermath. They should face legal action too. They aren't justice or even police. Fuck them.
I don't understand why thugs are allowed to have a free pass on gratuitous violence in the aftermath. They should face legal action too. They aren't justice or even police. Fuck them.
Congrats for all of you advocating a restrained person being beat. No wonder I want distance from all this WWE bs. The crowd was clearly happy to witness a lynching.
I don't understand why thugs are allowed to have a free pass on gratuitous violence in the aftermath. They should face legal action too. They aren't justice or even police. Fuck them.
Why would police?I don't understand why thugs are allowed to have a free pass on gratuitous violence in the aftermath. They should face legal action too. They aren't justice or even police. Fuck them.
Yeah.
The guy did something wrong and should get prosecuted. He was restrained. There was no point in piling up on him and throwing punches. They aren't servants of justice. I always hate this kind of stuff.That's an awful hot take. Way to not reading or understanding the situation.
And this wasn't about Bret and Nattie, it was about Jim "The Anvil" Neidhart, Nattie's dad, finally getting his recognition. Remember he died last year and this was the public eulogy. That asshole almost ruined a beautiful moment to remember Jim.
Yeah.
The guy did something wrong and should get prosecuted. He was restrained. There was no point in piling up on him and throwing punches. They aren't servants of justice. I always hate this kind of stuff.
Where did I say it wasn't about Anvil? And it was the Hart Foundation being inducted, so it was about Bret too.
Maybe it's you not reading or understanding the situation.
Yeah.
The guy did something wrong and should get prosecuted. He was restrained. There was no point in piling up on him and throwing punches. They aren't servants of justice. I always hate this kind of stuff.
I don't understand why thugs are allowed to have a free pass on gratuitous violence in the aftermath. They should face legal action too. They aren't justice or even police. Fuck them.
That would require lowering his noseThat's an awful hot take. Way to not reading or understanding the situation.
Turns out in real life when you tackle a beloved elderly person surrounded by huge wrestlers and MMA fighters bad things might happen to you. In what fucking world would anyone not get annihilated pulling this shit?Yeah.
The guy did something wrong and should get prosecuted. He was restrained. There was no point in piling up on him and throwing punches. They aren't servants of justice. I always hate this kind of stuff.
Turns out in real life when you tackle a beloved elderly person surrounded by huge wrestlers and MMA fighters bad things might happen to you. In what fucking world would anyone not get annihilated pulling this shit?
A world where people don't have emotions in the heat of the moment perhaps.A world were people respect the law and don't think two wrongs make a right. Obviously not this one based on video and reactions.
A world were people respect the law and don't think two wrongs make a right. Obviously not this one based on video and reactions.
But the attempt barely lasted seconds, as a swarm of wrestling stars came to Hart's rescue, leaping into the ring from all directions and pinning the man down.
They included legends like Xavier Woods, Tyson Kidd, Drake Maverick and Curtis Axel
He was complying as he was being led away on his feet one guy still felt the need to punch him, dropping the guy to his feet and making it harder to remove the guy asap. Understanding that is as simple as watching the video.What does restrained mean? Was he in cuffs? Was he complying? Was he still a threat? The answer to these questions are not as simple as you think it is.
He was complying as he was being led away on his feet one guy still felt the need to punch him, dropping the guy to his feet and making it harder to remove the guy asap. Understanding that is as simple as watching the video.
Its one thing to not want to blame anyone for how they reacted to the attack on Brett but folks dont need to go out of their way to justify cheap shots.
What law wasn't respected? Was the person still a threat when he got rocked? The answer is not a definitive no. Do you really think that people outside of the assailant should be prosecuted for this? Do you really want people wasting their time doing their hardest to send these wrestlers to prison for this? Do you really think that them not being prosecuted is an assault on society?
A world devoid of emotions and immediate consequences, sure, why not.A world were people respect the law and don't think two wrongs make a right. Obviously not this one based on video and reactions.
A world devoid of emotions and immediate consequences, sure, why not.
"Law above all" being applied for every situation is such a nonsense stance.
Jesus christ dude, take a break.Congrats for all of you advocating a restrained person being beat. No wonder I want distance from all this WWE bs. The crowd was clearly happy to witness a lynching.
If someone assaults my elderly father I am going to clock them in the fucking face. Fuck the law.So you think it should be legal to punch people after they assault someone else and are restrained?
If your heat of the moment emotion is to punch someone in the face you have a major fucking problem.A world where people don't have emotions in the heat of the moment perhaps.
If your heat of the moment emotion is to punch someone in the face you have a major fucking problem.
Axelmania still running.
If someone attacks my step-dad (also a stroke survivor like Bret), you best believe I'm going to punch them in the fucking face. No questions asked and no regrets felt.If your heat of the moment emotion is to punch someone in the face you have a major fucking problem.
If someone attacked your family and was restrained I'm sure all your emotions would immediately subside and you'd have a completely clear mind. If only everyone was like you.If your heat of the moment emotion is to punch someone in the face you have a major fucking problem.
If someone attacked your family and was restrained I'm sure all your emotions would immediately subside and you'd have a completely clear mind. If only everyone was like you.
We don't need anyone's word that it was the heat of the moment, it's right there on film in the middle of all the commotion and he certainly didn't pre-plan to hit some fan in the face prior to the show.Should we just take someone's word that they were in the heat of the moment and not thinking clearly? Or do you think an impartial third party should make that decision?