I worry more about any other video streaming services that aren't giants like Netflix or Google or Amazon and the like.
Oh for sure, Thats why I fully expect law suits everywhere. Many will suffer here.
I worry more about any other video streaming services that aren't giants like Netflix or Google or Amazon and the like.
Doubtful. Netflix even said the fight for net neutrality is not their primary concern.
https://www.recode.net/2017/5/31/15720268/netflix-ceo-reed-hastings-net-neutrality-open-internet
I worry more about any other video streaming services that aren't giants like Netflix or Google or Amazon and the like.
I assume companies like Sony, MS, Google, Netflix etc will all fight this right?
It's amazing that these people get away with fucking anything. Fucking anything.
/pol/ isn't representative of 4chan, the same way The Donald isn't representative of reddit. The majority of 4chan supports net neutrality.was on /pol/ to see how they were defending Daddy Trump's decision.
They literally want net neutrality dead because Reddit wants to preserve it.
Yep, I saw it myself, tons of comments in favor of Ajit Pai's idiot proposal, all identical, all made in the names of folks who didn't even know the ISPs (or whoever it was) were doing it.
In 2021, after we enshrine net neutrality, ban broadband caps, and force ISPs to justify any rate increase with the FCC, we need to investigate this and jail as many folks as we can.
Democracy hard at work. It's pretty amazing we have zero say in what the government does.
Is there anything Obama hasn't ruined? We should all be cheering from our rooftops that our beloved ISPs will have the opportunity to increase value for their shareholders."regulate the web like a 1930s utility"
He acts like that is a bad thing.
"No moderation and full anonymity foster the best ideas/content." My fucking ass.
At the expense of HUMANITY'S PROGRESS.Is there anything Obama hasn't ruined? We should all be cheering from our rooftops that our beloved ISPs will have the opportunity to increase value for their shareholders.
Because Google is a pretty shitty company who is expanding into being an ISP and could use that as levity to keep people on Google Platforms and charge more to use others?Gotcha..
It just doesn't make sense. The logical outcome is that many won't be able to have full internet like before. Therefore, their revenue will indeed lower overall. The internet will be a luxury..
Why support such a terrible move?
Gotcha..
It just doesn't make sense. The logical outcome is that many won't be able to have full internet like before. Therefore, their revenue will indeed lower overall. The internet will be a luxury..
Why support such a terrible move?
I am lost for words
Their net revenue will go down with this.. or am I missing the big picture
I hate Comcast and any NBC owned company. They are a shit internet provider.
Then NBC also owns The Golf Channel (and GolfNow) and they made a lot of predatory shitty moves in the golf industry that destroyed a lot of revenue for smaller golf courses and operators. They fucked a lot of businesses over so they could make more money for doing almost nothing.
They are the most predatory company I have ever dealt with in my life. They don't give a shit about the customers or the markets they shit all over.
I mean, your say is through your representative, and whomever you voted for as President. That is democracy at hand.
Because no government in any world is gonna ever function if it has to cater to EVERY SINGLE interest
They use this strategy all the time. "Obamacare is preventing you from being able to access affordable insurance"... uhhh, not it's notI can't comprehend how he can lie so blatantly. I mean "Save the Open Internet" is literally the exact opposite of what he is trying to do. I don't understand how news agencies can just run this without calling this shit out.
Pretty much. They've figured out their constituents like it when they lie to them.They use this strategy all the time. "Obamacare is preventing you from being able to access affordable insurance"... uhhh, not it's not
Pretty much. They've figured out their constituents like it when they lie to them.
Right but most people don't want this, but ultimately we have zero choice in the decision other than to be loud about it.
then most of those people should have voted for someone that wouldn't have put this a-hole in the ftc chair. remember, this guy was confirmed by the senate
He's making up bullshit claiming that net neutrality didn't exist before 2014. Hes a disingenuous liar.
there was a big thread on this on the old place months ago. People were finding when they went to leave a comment that someone had already submitted a chain letter in support of removing net neutrality using their identity
Let me guess:
Russians, on behalf of the Trump administration, are running bots to make fake Anti Net Neutrality submissions?
And then changed their minds a month later.Doubtful. Netflix even said the fight for net neutrality is not their primary concern.
https://www.recode.net/2017/5/31/15720268/netflix-ceo-reed-hastings-net-neutrality-open-internet
This is why I'm proposing today that my colleagues at the Federal Communications Commission repeal President Obama's heavy-handed internet regulations. Instead the FCC simply would require internet service providers to be transparent so that consumers can buy the plan that's best for them. And entrepreneurs and other small businesses would have the technical information they need to innovate. The Federal Trade Commission would police ISPs, protect consumers and promote competition, just as it did before 2015. Instead of being flyspecked by lawyers and bureaucrats, the internet would once again thrive under engineers and entrepreneurs.