For what it worth FH4 does have a 30 FPS high quality 4K vs 1080Pp 60FPS mode and I chose the 30fps as I can't really tell much difference. I'm one of the lucky one that doesn't get headaches though.I get that some of you need to be console warriors and must get all defensive, but chill. Im Just hoping 60 fps becomes more common in consoles. Im not threatning your manhood or anything.
Because "30 fps is.... fine... i guess" is not something we need should need to be saying. Console games should atleast offer a chiice between lower graphics levels and 60 fps and higher settings at 30.
Choices are good, right?
I'm currently looking for a new PC monitor and was thinking that it might be time to experience 120 hz gaming. But then I think about what that could mean for my console gaming and wonder whether I would be better off not knowing what higher frame rates are like.I know the feeling OP. Playing at 120fps just makes it even more jarring. I use a 120hz ultrawide as my main PC monitor, and going back to console game in 16:9 at 30 (or even sub-30...) is really jarring, to the point it hampers my experience. Games are just so much more immersive when they run buttery smooth and you have all that extra screen space.
That's why pc exists. So you can have all those choices you want.
Most console gamers don't want to endlessly fuck around with optimizing shit. That's the entire point.
Also, you don't have to be a dick about it.
For a lot of games, it's not quite as simple as tweaking the graphics and resolution to get higher frame-rates. Some games are very CPU intensive or have things that are tied to their frame-rate or what not. That and most folk aren't really all that anal about framerates to begin with so there isn't much incentive there to begin withI get that some of you need to be console warriors and must get all defensive, but chill. Im Just hoping 60 fps becomes more common in consoles. Im not threatning your manhood or anything.
Because "30 fps is.... fine... i guess" is not something we need should need to be saying. Console games should atleast offer a chiice between lower graphics levels and 60 fps and higher settings at 30.
Choices are good, right?
Playing Okami HD now at silky smooth 30FPS and I don't see the problem.
I mean yeah, 60FPS is nice, but then again, I play through Star Fox yearly and that game runs at what, 15FPS? Still a blast.
But yeah, I hope it gets better for you, OP. Hang in there!
Because "30 fps is.... fine... i guess" is not something we need should need to be saying. Console games should atleast offer a chiice between lower graphics levels and 60 fps and higher settings at 30.
Choices are good, right?
That's the same to me. After few minutes I stop to notice it or hardly I have any issue with 30fps.I'm routinely jumping between a PC and PS4 Pro, so used to shifts but it always takes a few mins for me to get used to 30 fps after finishing a 60 fps game.
I played Monster Hunter World on PS4 for like 200 hours and had no issues. Then I played it for about 40 hours on PC with buttery smooth 60FPS and then went back to PS4 and it was like playing in molasses.
I mean I guess, but there are definitely a lot of games that tie framerate to game logic because it makes it significantly easier to predict/test. Decoupling game logic from specific units of time doesn't necessarily improve a game because it leads to instability in things that people take for granted in titles. (As for me, I tend to regard things like falling through the floor of a game as an amusing novelty more than a dealbreaker but as long as I'm writing a serious post I guess I ought to be open about the fact that I recognize this is not a commonly-held opinion in gamer culture since physics bugs are the one thing most people believe makes or breaks a game)
I know the feeling OP. Playing at 120fps just makes it even more jarring. I use a 120hz ultrawide as my main PC monitor, and going back to console game in 16:9 at 30 (or even sub-30...) is really jarring, to the point it hampers my experience. Games are just so much more immersive when they run buttery smooth and you have all that extra screen space.
I dont know anyone that still does this... except maybe some japanese games and fighting games maybe?
That's why pc exists. So you can have all those choices you want.
Most console gamers don't want to endlessly fuck around with optimizing shit. That's the entire point.
I get that some of you need to be console warriors and must get all defensive, but chill. Im Just hoping 60 fps becomes more common in consoles. Im not threatning your manhood or anything.
100%Because "30 fps is.... fine... i guess" is not something we need should need to be saying. Console games should atleast offer a chiice between lower graphics levels and 60 fps and higher settings at 30.
Choices are good, right?
I'm with you on this, and I feel like it's from growing up playing games with no attention on framerate. Back in the NES and SNES days, we didn't talk about framerate, we just said it has heavier controls or something like that. There wasn't a huge market flooded with games so we adapted and didn't complain because it's all we knew.I play at 165 FPS on my PC and then immediately go to 30 FPS on my PS4 and I'm fine with it. I notice the big difference but it's not annoying.
It isn't bad, nor is it baffling that people don't have a problem with it. We're all different. You hate 30fps clearly, but try not to point fingers at others with an "What's wrong with you?!" attitude just because they have no problem with it and even embrace it if it means better graphics.30fps is bad and you guys should really stop accepting it. Baffling when people have zero issues with 30fps.
Buttery Smooth 15FPS Star Fox is the only label I'll ever accept!30 fps is not silky anything.
30 fps is brillo pad smooth.
40-50 fps with variable refrssh display is silky smooth.
60 fps is buttery smooth.
120 fps is baby butt smooth.
And a 144 fps is the smoothest.
These are the proper labels. ;p
I'm with you on this, and I feel like it's from growing up playing games with no attention on framerate. Back in the NES and SNES days, we didn't talk about framerate, we just said it has heavier controls or something like that. There wasn't a huge market flooded with games so we adapted and didn't complain because it's all we knew.
I don't think an X would be good enough for you bud. You clearly have exquisite taste and love to tell people about them so why do it to yourself Ace?Does anyone happen to know if Lego Dimensions runs at 60 on the X? Not that I would splurge for one, but maybe I can borrow one from a friend. Since the line of toys is defunct now I don't think the game will get anything like a remaster or patch support though, so I doubt it...
I don't think an X would be good enough for you bud. You clearly have exquisite taste and love to tell people about them so why do it to yourself.
No, we're talk about you and you son and how great your eyes are.Oh grow up.. We're talking about plastic video game machines. No need to get offended and throw a hissy fit.
outside of FPS and Sports/Racing games, what top games are there that run at 60?Funniest thing about that? Most best selling games on consoles run at 60.
No, we're talk about you and you son and how great your eyes are.
outside of FPS and Sports/Racing games, what top games are there that run at 60?
(i already know mario odyssey and pokemon)
He has better eyes then me as well.