This rumor is the worst kind. If online doesn't become free, I'm sure MS will get shit for it, even when this rumor came out of thin air.
They would get shit for increasing the price, since they removed the yearly option.
This rumor is the worst kind. If online doesn't become free, I'm sure MS will get shit for it, even when this rumor came out of thin air.
I see it on Amazon
Yeah i think so too honestly. Or at least all 1st party titles or something will have free online
They did it because you end up paying more by buying 3 month subscriptions
Sure. You clearly only meant 'Halo Infinite won't need XB Live Gold' with all your comments lately like these here:I'm not being deceptive. So far I've told people to be patient and to imagine Halo Infinite not requiring Xbox Live Gold. If people choose not to read my words carefully then that's their own fault :)
So you can't on the official store and have to rely on third party (and no idea for how long). Thanks for the clarification.
Gimme the powerball numbers while you're at it, chief.So, this is going to end with free to play games not requiring Gold. Oh, what an earth-shattering announcement. What a bomb dropped on Sony.
They did it because you end up paying more by buying 3 month subscriptions
I see it on Amazon
Amazon.com: Xbox Live Gold: 12 Month Membership [Digital Code]: Video Games
Buy Xbox Live Gold: 12 Month Membership [Digital Code]: Read Video Games Reviews - Amazon.comwww.amazon.com
why notWhatever happens, MS is not going to charge people more for playing online MP then they do currently.
I like you Tom, you're a good reporter. But come on, the sub header on your Xbox Gold article says "Xbox Live could still, maybe, go free". Idk if that is a separate author but don't act surprised when people are confused.So you agree I never said it was going free. Great, glad we cleared that up.
You can still get access to online multiplayer for 5 bucks a month.. you just gotta buy game pass, too.Whatever happens, MS is not going to charge people more for playing online MP then they do currently.
Terrible PR. If you need GP to play online at current pricing that is twice as much as PS plus.
that's not the only way of increasing the price. they'd want to do it little by little, as they have been doing and as ps plus has been doing.Terrible PR. If you need GP to play online at current pricing that is twice as much as PS plus.
Whatever happens, MS is not going to charge people more for playing online MP then they do currently.
Insult? I merely said if you had a good understanding of English then you'd be able to read what I've said previously. Like you said, maybe it's time for you to take the L.
Are you serious right now? Questioning someone's understanding of english because they didn't interpret your tweet the way you wanted? It's not him taking the L that's for sure
Insult? I merely said if you had a good understanding of English then you'd be able to read what I've said previously. Like you said, maybe it's time for you to take the L.
Yeah, no.The gains come by lowering the barrier of entry then having more people play your games and buy dlc.
I don't know why y'all listen to them dudes anyways. There won't be backlash on Xbox. There was probably talks about around MS and that got out n tweets were made.If Gold stays, there is going to be a backlash.... but it's a backlash about a rumour and generalized belief spun from journalists, bloggers and forums. So .. they'll get roasted for nothing. Basically MS keeps gold, there is backlash. Sony keeps PS+, no backlash. THESE ARE WEIRD TIMES MAN.
It's like you ignored how the industry has evolved this past decade. Just look at sony's latest financial reportYeah, no.
The real world doesn't work this way. The PS3 with its free online MP proved this. PSN had far less paid subs and digital platform revenue in general, despite free online.
Given how successful charging a fee for gamers to play online has been on consoles, to not do it would be commercially and fiscally irresponsible from a business perspective.
No matter how much of a good guy Phil is, he isn't putting his job on the line to take a $2Billion risk like that. Especially with all the money they're already sinking into GamePass to grow subs for that service.
The funny thing is, anyone with half a brain could see exactly what that tweet was implying...very little interpretation was needed.
Except that's literally what happened.Whatever happens, MS is not going to charge people more for playing online MP then they do currently.
That means literally nothing. Those have contracts about when they can sell codes and not. Those too will run out soon enough.
Everyone under that tweet is talking about XBL being free.The funny thing is, anyone with half a brain could see exactly what that tweet was implying...very little interpretation was needed.
Everyone under that tweet is talking about XBL being free.
I wonder how they got that idea?
It's like you ignored how the industry has evolved this past decade. Just look at sony's latest financial report
Add on content is 41% of their revenue. Opening up more users to that add on content by removing gold can definitely be profitable
I'm not being deceptive. So far I've told people to be patient and to imagine Halo Infinite not requiring Xbox Live Gold. If people choose not to read my words carefully then that's their own fault :)
This sounds like a grandfathering type of situation. Chances are that goes away at some point, too.Except people that currently have Gold 1YR plans are being renewed at 59.99 autocharges on their CCs. To this very day.
GP (same as before, but gives online MP for XB console, priced near the $59 XBLG annual price, maybe hiked to 69 or 79, but I doubt 99)
If only I was a native english speaker, I could understand this...
This sounds like a grandfathering type of situation. Chances are that goes away at some point, too.
They were never going to confirm this before whenever they actually planned to announce it. It's incredibly rare for any company to comment on stuff like this early when asked about leaks, even when those leaks are true.
This entire thread is speculation.'Chances are' is speculation though. And because it's coming straight from the source, it's already inconsistent. Whenever you sign up for any of these services, you are EULA'd into something boiling down to 'You have no rights, we can remove/cancel/change at any time for any or no reason'.