If I'm one of your top scum reads, care to provide examples of my "treading water"?
I've spent a bit of time today pondering the best way to answer it.
I considered just *not*, but that would feel cheap.
It's less of a sequence and more of an overall sense, so just trying to do some big ol' iso ain't going to help (not that anyone would read it anyway).
So let's try and break it down a little.
You're wracking up posts like anything and I feel like a large proportion of them are easy information questions..
You made a point of saying you weren't going to reread yourself, and as a result have free reign to keep asking people questions, which you do.
But doing so means everything can be blamed on the tint of the person you get answering you. Oh I didn't know that because they didn't tell me. Oh I didn't know that was wrong. Oh someone else said thing other thing I didn't know already.
It allows you to keep interacting with things that are tentatively game content without it necessarily being remotely useful.
You say you didn't even know what Jman did when you subbed in, does someone really sub in and not even give their predecesor a cursory glance?
Especially when you then say it was predictable.
You think Anex's claim sounds like something that "would never be signed off" but instead you question him about LP, you assume he would react certain ways when you already know he clearly doesn't think the same as the rest of us.
You fish for reactions on Anex and LP from everyone, and this means that you can latch on to things they say without being responsible for them.
You say your suspicion is still towards LP, but it's Anex you're nudging at, fishing for limitations on his role, asking about, waiting to hear from others to delay your own vote, so that when Anex is the wrong vote you can go whoops, should've trusted my gut but damn that particular thing really looked like a smoking gun.
You asked where ATPs claim was, when it was one of the last things he posted before he went poof. You went back and looked through scooby to try and say HP's play this game and that were different, but for this game you didn't look at the first posts your predecesor made or the last posts the neutral made when you were talking about him?
You asked for the flip, got linked the flip, and then admitted not actually fully reading the flip.
Again, it feels designed to give you an excuse to tread trodden ground. It's very head above water, rather than actually swimming.
And I don't know if it's scummy or not, but what
really bugs me is you and Vere sitting around commenting on the thread being dead but not actually talking to each other or asking each other game things. It's weird.
So yes, this was a big long ramble that is entirely subjective but fuck it. Feelings are valid.
I feel like your play is designed to allow you to be more flightly and latch on to things that suit you and miss others.
