Today on...interesting takes...The author is advocating for preference primaries. Basically, voters would vote for their preferred candidate and about possible issues...and then the Elites would decide based on that results...which is kind of what we have already...and if said elites decided to toss that public opinion that wouldn't solve the divide anyways...I'm confused by this article.
The editorial in the last few paragraphs after the fluff finally gets around to saying we should have ranked choice primaries and ballot questions so the final convention is more informed on what the party wants nationwide. If the editors chose that title for her they sandbagged the shit out of the substance.