thats fair enough, less fair is the immediate jump to scum reading me for not just immediately letting it pass, why is it so unreasonable for me to dare bring it up?
this is all well and good but have you considered being a provocative ass to people instead?
honestly not really, probably gonna no vote, really mix things up a little
Rather not say.
You could just have forgotten. I really wouldn't have minded.
I did get something out of it, there was enough time for others to vote and avoid a tie, and if there was a scum in either traim then it comes to reason scum might expose themselves a but by saving a scummate. I saw te Geno train coming since he had one vote because it was an easy vote to justify since he wasn't around and that tells us very little. But if its a closer race and later on sparks gets flipped as scum then it becomes a powerful tool to sniff out further scum. Close races are better in mafia and turning up the heat makes it happen.
Starts with a joke about scum reading him.
He likes what Hawthorn is saying, but immediately undermines it with both the "not much there" and the scum comment.
ATP is town but he buffers it by saying he doesn't really know ATP's scum game.
He was pushing against the Sorian vote, but he hedges for NAI rather than town even while defending him.
Salva leans town but Salva is scummy anyway. Maybe he's scum or maybe he's just wrong.
Town reads him but in a backhanded way, and even then still links his actions to something he did once before as scum.
He hates the response, but he'll let him off "for now"
Flat out says he likes him, while excusing things he wants to overlook.
If our wonderful gamerunners give permission I'll post the message I received in here so you can all Google it and suffer like I have.Smut?
