-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Chris Pratt Debuts Pitch-Perfect Mario Impression in Interview Just to Fuck With You
- Thread starter DrForester
- Start date
I'm still going to wait for the movie to confirm but i tend to agree the movie voice is fine.
Very interesting though to see the online discorse go from rejection of Pratt to the 'but of course he could do it' position. Next one may be 'oh he's great actually'./
Very interesting though to see the online discorse go from rejection of Pratt to the 'but of course he could do it' position. Next one may be 'oh he's great actually'./
He's an avid defender of a church that supports conversion therapy and check out just a few of his Twitter follows.
Dude's trash.
All leading up to the epic finale - Advance Wars: Orange Star V. Blue Moon
Totally agree. I bet he tried a few voices and the director was like "this one". 100%. Also, as the lead, imo, he has to have a normal sounding voice. It's going to be awful to listen to something ridiculous for 2 hours. It'll feel cheap.
Shitting on Charles Martinet to defend Chris Pratt of all fucking people seems pretty gross to me. VAs get enough shit as it is and your rich, homophobic white man doesn't need a defense force.
Martinet's long-form Mario voice sounds fine. All those videos are him ad-libbing. Give him a script and a voice director and he'd be gold.
I don't need him to sound just like the game voice for Mario, I just want him to sound like he's not board as heck while doing his lines. Hopefully that's just the trailers picking out bad lines, but so far it sounds like he's putting in so much less effort than the other VAs. Like Jack Black doesn't sound like the Bowser we're used to, but it sounds like he's putting in the effort to be his own Bowser.
I do, but it's more like "Oh wow, it's Chris Pratt." and not "Oh Wow! It's Chris Pratt!"
Not a fan of stunt casting. Sometimes it works, but most of the time hearing a big name actor's voice ruins it a bit for me.
There's definitely some processing there, be it pitch shift or other plugins.
That's not really the point - and it has no bearing on the quality of the performance itself. The point being that he has the range and the delivery - and any assumption that this man's entire scope is limited to a couple of childish 'woo-hoos' is ridiculous.
Really, he's been acting for longer than most folks here realize, and if Pratt can achieve a passable Mario with the input of a competent and experienced voice director, there's zero reason to assume Martinet couldn't excel in the role.
My point being: People don't need to tear down one actor to build up the other. Unfortunately, in the rush to defend Nintendo's decision, too many people are taking that position.
Last edited:
But the delivery is altered very much by the dialogue designer who had processing input. That voice as is wasn't captured in booth.
Remember that 'processing' is no substitute for poor voice work. It has to be based on a foundation of a strong natural performance, full stop. Attempting to manipulate a performance in post to 'hide' a bad take is fraught with issues, and given the volume of work these games demand it is more efficient and cheaper to simply choose an actor who can do the job . And this is far from the only example of Martinet's work.
(Trust me. Having helmed several games including 2 professionally-voiced visual novels, I know what I'm talking about :) )
Personally I'm still of the theory that Nintendo never wanted Martinet to do Mario for the movies because Mario's game voice is basically a recyclable brand unto itself that they want to preserve, and they probably aren't looking to cross the streams too overtly on what happens in the games and what happens in the movie. His iconicity in the role isn't lost on people, so doing a different take on what he's known for would ellicit a "why" for several reasons. Nintendo on the whole totally strikes me as the type of company that probably wants the continued veneer of not opening up the pandora's box on how Martinet should "change the Mario voice" in the games to reflect on what he'd provide in a movie tailored performance. Their solution to still honor his legacy; cast him in non-specific roles that don't pertain to this version of Mario.
I really only know Chris Pratt from GotG (I don't watch many movies) and didn't mind him on there at all. And I don't mind him here either. Sounds fine to me.
I never really follow social media for movies/shows, so I'm not even sure why he's hated at this point other than people hate his voice for some reason.
I never really follow social media for movies/shows, so I'm not even sure why he's hated at this point other than people hate his voice for some reason.
Mario's voice in the games has always sounded bad to me, but what we've heard of Pratt doesn't inspire much confidence regardless.
And as someone who processed AI and Alien voices at 343i I know what I'm talking about. He's talented, I'm not lying about that, but to offer a heavily modified sample as an example is disingenuous.
There's a particular character who sounds completely different post processing that I worked on, I have immense respect for the actor, but I was there for the recording and people wouldn't believe it's the same voice in the Season 3 cinematics after what was done.
it don't matta... none o dis mattas.
but yes clearly they got pratt only, ONLY for the movie start name recognition because you know, hollywood + localization, etc.
they could have easily let the mario guy do the mario voice for real on the movies this time, but eh, they don't care.
but yes clearly they got pratt only, ONLY for the movie start name recognition because you know, hollywood + localization, etc.
they could have easily let the mario guy do the mario voice for real on the movies this time, but eh, they don't care.
Video game adaptations must be 1:1 carbon copy remakes that shoot down the idea of creative control at all times. 😤
It's about perceived quality. If you see known actors you know the studio invested serious cash into the movie.
He's a plumber from Brooklyn, he shouldn't sound like italian Mickey Mouse.
It's like people forget that Martinet wasn't the original voice and that before him Mario sounded deep and raspy, his voice is not the be all and end all of Mario voices.
First of all, very cool with regards to your previous work 🙂
Secondly - It's not really being disingenuous (this is the clip that has been making the rounds so to speak), with some digging here's him doing the same voice at a noisy con, admittedly embellishing for a fan:
View: https://youtu.be/jUIK7jl3Hpo
I even stumbled on a clip of some of his smaller live action roles (CME, presenter, etc). I assume it's for his CV.
View: https://youtu.be/P6xCzmFwVCo
And we agree: the truth is he's likely more than capable of a more subtle, or if necessary understated performance with some good direction. My point being (again) there's no need to assume he couldn't do the job given a good director; Pratt has the same benefit here. There's simply no need for folks to assume he'd be 'terrible' because they're only familiar with his over-the top aspects of his Mario. There's no need for folks to hate on him, as some have resorted to.
And this isn't me railing against Pratt either - Nintendo had obvious reasons for going the direction they did, and I can see it from their perspective.
Last edited:
I mean yeah, I've met him at a few E3's seems genuinely talented and a genuinely nice guy.
My whole point was that's definitely his cadence and breath control, but the depth and voice texture is absolutely supported via processing, as is routine for most VO talent these days.
Only person I have ever worked with who can do a completely unaltered or digitally supported voice with no augmentation was Lorne Lanning. His Abe, Munch, and Slig were all from the voice alone.
Agreed - I'm not saying that Martinet is rattling the booth naturally with his bass, heh. But the skill is absolutely there.
Yeah, Lorne takes you by surprise when he does the voices, because his natural voice is nowhere near any of his characters. I'd add Darin DePaul to that list. He has some incredible range (he flipped from doing a sniveling gangster to doing a deep German baritone in the same performance and sounded completely different, and little to nothing like his actual speaking voice).
He's the voice of Mario since '91.
In public opinion he's -the- voice of Mario, what was before him isn't that relevant anymore
It has the opposite effect. When I see animated movies with an ensemble cast of big name actors I think the studio only cares about selling tickets on name recognition, which is often the case. Look at crap like the Emoji movie.
I remember recording temp Dialogue and there were only 3 of us in the studio and he'd be yelling in character in regards to notes. I don't know how that doesn't hurt the throat tbh.