Drive Club is an amazing game that had a troubled development but they turned it around.
The Order wasn't even done by a Sony studio
But their quantity and quality really not match with Sony and Nintendo. Hopefully next gen will be better
Tough luck. Definitions are definitions. Spider-Man was most definitely not a first party game.
Nah. Ratchet & Clank is a Sony 1st party game. It's not developed by a Sony owned studio. Same goes for Quantum Break. It's a Microsoft 1st party game. Even tho Remedy isn't a Microsoft owned studio.
Sony doesn't own Ready at dawn studio but they still got shit on for The Order 1886.
Crackdown is a first party IP. It was their choice to give the IP to sumo.
I honestly believe that if it weren't for the whole cloud computing gimmick MS was touting when this game was announced, Crackdown 3 wouldn't have been greenlit in the first place.
And even if they didn't own the IP, so long as they're the ones funding and publishing it, it's still first party. Sony doesn't own Spider-Man, Nintendo doesn't own Bayonetta 2 and Microsoft doesn't own Sunset Overdrive but all three are still first party games.
Can we imagine if CD3 was released in 2017 as Xbox One X launch title?
With more than 1 year extra development time, the game managed to be 60s.
If it were released in 2017, man, I don't want to think about it....
Still so disappointed one of my favorite franchise got destroyed like this...
For me this game looked average from the beginning (well, after they removed the total destruction) and it seems that I was right.
Crackdown 3? Crackdown 3 is a Microsoft 1st party game.
Spider-Man is a Sony 1st party game.
Reviewers are really....cracking down...on that franchise. Heh.
Your are making same weird rules up. Microsoft funded the game. They even own the IP. It doesn't matter who developed it.It just doesn't make sense, we know that MS has never put a MS studio on this IP. It just wouldn't make sense to call it first party if not of your first party studios haven't touched the IP before.
Huh, from what I remember RFG is just random open world missions you do over and over until you have destroyed everything. And that would be better than what CD3 has to offer??A lot of us were right. What boggles my mind is, we are not developers, but people who over saw the game didn't raise any hands and say, maybe this gameplay is dated?
Maybe we should rethink and try to make something better? They could have honestly made something like red faction guerrilla with mild destruction, but with a more lively city, and made getting powers and jumping around more interesting.
Spidey isn't first party. Sony literally owns no part of the title. That's like saying KH is a Square Enix game.
You've already played Crackdown 3? This is also one of my favorite franchises, and it looks like more of the same Crackdown we both love. So why do you think it was "destroyed?"
People have a really hard time wrapping their head around the definition of first party. I don't get it."Correcting" me while they are wrong? Crackdown 3 is a Microsoft 1st party game. If you like it or not. Don't know what your problem is actually.
Probably depends more on how much the game is played and what kind of support it gets. I doubt metacritic scores mean much to people who already paid for the game via gamepass. Sea of Thieves reviewed similarly and is still growing.I'd be shocked if we see another. Should they have just canned this years ago and saved the money and bad press from these reviews? They must have decided the press from Canning the game would be worse, especially after Scalebound.
"Marvel's Spider-Man" is a trademark of SIE. They own that specific Spider-Man game. No one could make a sequel to that game unless it is Sony or someone with Sony's permission. It is funded and published by Sony. That's a first party game.Spidey isn't first party. Sony literally owns no part of the title. That's like saying KH is a Square Enix game.
are you doing this on purpose?Crackdown 3 is a 2nd party developed (Sumo Digital) exclusive sequel based on the Microsoft IP Crackdown.
Now it should be correct
"Correcting" me while they are wrong? Crackdown 3 is a Microsoft 1st party game. If you like it or not. Don't know what your problem is actually.
Your are making same weird rules up. Microsoft funded the game. They even own the IP. It doesn't matter who developed it.
It's a Microsoft 1st party game.
Staten was literally dropped in at the last minute to try and save the mess. It's hardly his gameJoseph Staten must be very sad. 2 games from him this generation, Recore and Crackdown 3, were not well received.
Don't know what you mean?
Spidey isn't first party. Sony literally owns no part of the title. That's like saying KH is a Square Enix game.