Here is Trump tweeting out support for gay people. He's done this multiple times. I'm sorry, but it's not a line of attack that makes sense to come directly from him. Not denying that it would be a huge issue in the campaign.
People keep saying this but I'm not convinced it is a good argument. Yes, voters are used to republicans calling literally every democrat a far-left socialist, but hardly any democrats self-identify as socialist. Republicans have also said democrats are "on the side of the terrorists" and voters are still OK with democrats, but I'm sure you will admit that it would go over poorly if a democratic candidate was on video praising ISIS. Do voters not care when they call Joe Biden a socialist because they think socialism is awesome, or do they not care because they know it's a hyperbolic political attack and Joe Biden is not actually a socialist? How does that change if you're running an ad attacking Bernie as a socialist using his own words?
Agreed. We've seen time and time again that Trump has no concrete morals or values and will say whatever's convenient to him in the moment. If he thinks that he can get conservatives fired up by playing the homophobia card he'll absolutely do it.
Here is Trump tweeting out support for gay people. He's done this multiple times. I'm sorry, but it's not a line of attack that makes sense to come directly from him. Not denying that it would be a huge issue in the campaign.
Democrat voters are not changing sides because of an attack ad. They might not vote at all if they don't feel motivated though.
Here is Trump tweeting out support for gay people. He's done this multiple times. I'm sorry, but it's not a line of attack that makes sense to come directly from him. Not denying that it would be a huge issue in the campaign.
it would be a first for trump to not attack someone for being different. I'm certain that a man who mocked a disabled person would go hog wild mocking a gay person.
Here is Trump tweeting out support for gay people. He's done this multiple times. I'm sorry, but it's not a line of attack that makes sense to come directly from him. Not denying that it would be a huge issue in the campaign.
This is it.
This is exactly what will happen. It hasn't happened yet because Pete is invisible to trump as a threat so far.
50 percent of the party isn't the Zeitgeist.
Well we arguably shouldn't nominate him because he's a wet paper bag with a really bad record on minorities. He isn't sniffing the nomination without black support.
He's definitely made progress. But you also have to keep 2018 in mind because a lot of those types of candidates lost in races while moderates cleaned up.
this. he would do something like this more like
This is EXACTLY what he would do. And he'd never let Pete live down his history on race in Indiana, while simultaneously parroting lies about his own contributions to Americans of color.
This is taking a lot away from Occupy. Without them, Bernie doesn't get his opening. That's what started it all: a bunch of protesters in some tents angry about getting screwed by the rich.
Trump is the source of birtherism and he's attacked Obama relentlessly via that racist platform. Not his surrogates. Him.
im having trouble imagining who is going to disagree with this
im at least glad no one will dispute he is a bottom
I've met plenty of dudes who give off top energy only to turn full bottom behind closed doors. It isn't impossible, lol.
