They just want to shit on Disney and the MCU. It validates their saltiness and hate
I don't know how people are coming to the conclusion that Disney is paying and making the movies and Sony is taking the profit.
Except I could see this movie bombing especially if it ends up as another reboot
Amen to thisGood. Because I'm getting tired of the Marvel movies. They all look the same.
There's just too much unfunny and misplaced comic relief in these Marvel movies.
Disney was the reason Far From Home was as successful as it was. 50/50 is more than fair.
Marvel Studios is competent though. It'll suck but it'll hurt Sony and Spiderman moreYep Disney fucked up here.
This hurts them way more than it does Sony. When they inevitability bring back Stark. To not have Peter Parker there would be hilarious especially after all the setting up they've been doing over the last few movies
This too. This wouldn't have made a difference regarding Sony's box-office take, all it would have done is adjust who absorbs what costs of production. In a sense, it's Disney trying to equalize the cost of making these movies in a way that's more beneficial; Sony would have still gotten as much of the ticket sales as they did before.
Too ancient to be Spidey, also too smug of a face.
This literally kills his character, that would be too awful if he continues.Somewhere, Tom Holland is putting a call in to his agent to get the hell of that contract.
I'm sorry but in no universe does Disney need 50% of anything from Sony's Spiderman films, that is absurdly greedy. (sorry about the drive by I'm on my phone accidentally hit post)
They can't do that, lmao. Sony owns part of the character of Spider-man.
I know right? Disney offered a shitty deal and Sony left. Too bad. But it makes sense.When people start seriously arguing that co-financing a film 50/50 doesn't mean that Sony and Disney would split the profits 50/50 is when I bail out of this thread.
Cheers.
I'm all for shitting on a corp but how was Disney greedy? The original deal was for Spider-Man: Homecoming, its sequel, Civil War, and the two Avengers. The upcoming MCU slate doesn't have any Avengers movies or films that would make sense for Spidey to cross over in. Disney offering to pay for half the film and for an undisclosed amount of profit makes sense for the amount of leg work they put into the character.
Wooooooow the irony of this in a post ASM2 world is just... wowFinally, maybe we can actually get some good Spiderman movies as opposed to cynical corporate-friendly focus tested dreck.
Their garbo Venom movie made almost 900M dollars worldwide. The ASM movies both made over 700M. Where exactly is the sense in giving up 50% of Spider-man's gross to Disney? Or any kind of substantial percentage?That was just the opening bid. Disney just made Sony a BILLION dollars. Sony didn't even come back to the table to negotiate.
It was pretty sweet, seeing everything superhero -related in Homecoming and Far From Home revolve around Tony Stark and Tony Stark's legacy, and everything not superhero -related revolve around generic high school drama cliches.It's almost like changing it up with him hanging out with other superheroes was part of the appeal, crazy I know
Can you tell me how much you think Disney is asking for the gross? Do you really think that a 50/50 split in cost won't make them ask for a similar split in revenue?To be fair-they do....but their hate boner for anything MCU/Disney drains blood from the rest of their brain.
Er, yes, because that's Marvel trying to get more control over the Spider-Man license and the profits from it."Disney asked that future Spider-Man films be a 50/50 co-financing arrangement between the studios, and there were discussions that this might extend to other films in the Spider-Man universe."
Sounds like Disney was willing to help out Sony outside of Spider-Man as well. Probably with their Morbius and Venom films. Is it really that greedy?
Hilarious watching all the marvel fanboys blame sony here when disney wanted 50%. That is hilariously insane.
Yes but only one company has a history of making shitty Spiderman films and has tom rothman and avi Arad in charge.Let's not act like this entire thread ain't a bunch of people bickering over something none of us have any real context or insight into based mostly on which company they like better. People are shitting on Sony and acting "salty"'just as much as they are with Disney, and in both cases it's probably based on nothing substantial.
We know they read Neogaf to see reactions to the ASM trailer.
Instead we'll just get more darkness, killing, and brooding.Good. Because I'm getting tired of the Marvel movies. They all look the same.
There's just too much unfunny and misplaced comic relief in these Marvel movies.
Who knows. I expect the general audience isn't hip to the studio politics, so it'll still make bank, but if there's that quality drop off, I feel like people will smarten up when part 4 rolls around.Shit, if they piss off half the audience, it might don't do numbers.
Maybe. But it's the wrong play for fans and consumers. Back to shit tastic Spiderman so they can add him to the horrible Venomverse.Venom just made an absurd amount of money. As trash as TASM was it still made tons of money. This is the right play by sony.
When people start seriously arguing that co-financing a film 50/50 doesn't mean that Sony and Disney would split the profits 50/50 is when I bail out of this thread.
Cheers.
How much you wanna bet they'll reach an agreement by the end of the year?