Would like further clarification, seems like I worded stuff poorly. Apologies.
I wasn't asking so much about your thoughts on Blarg but rather about the recent Maol comment on him. Since you've spent some time criticizing the Hawthorn vote and discussing the real value of meta, I'd expect for you to comment on Mao going "wildcard" on Blarg.
On the other point, my mistake, you didn't call them out. You brought these up. But you didn't quote Sparks' vote nor did you comment on it when you were talking about the usefulness of Sparks' play for town.
You did say it was related to him being lunched D1 last game, though. So, do you see how that looks a bit weird when you and Pancakes have been downplaying the utility of past baggages to play?
While "avoid" does imply a conscious choice, the words I put before were there to highlight what you comment on your first sentence (except the NAI part).
Thought that him not being bewildered by not being in contention and putting in some game-related comments - like the one wee really seemed to like that I can't find due to mobile - would indicate town according to your method?
May have read it all wrong, though.
Can't recall this, could you point me to it?
I'm not sure what maol said about blarg?
The meta thing is tough for me because I've played one game, and only a handful are in this game.
Like if I meta read pancakes, I was very suspicious of her last game but she was town. She is playing very similarly here so I'm still kind of suspicious of her because I find her conservative play style kind of suspicious but its ultimately not that helpful to read into that meta when my only example of that playstyle was town.
Similarly sparks is being obtuse and unhelpful as he was last game where he was town.
I didn't mention anything about sparks vote on hawthorn because it just seemed a random nonsensical Sparks vote at the time.
And when i bought up the concerns about the hawthorn vote there were several hours left and things could have gone a lot of ways. I was only interested in pointing out how sus launch's vote was, not really looking into the other votes that were already there.
If you want to read more into Sparks vote more it becomes more suspicious with his eod absence. He saw a town double kill was in the firing line and just stayed quiet to make it seem like he just wasn't around and his earlier vote was so early it could appear inconsequential.
I'm still not quite sure what you are asking but hopefully this answers your second question a bit better, you would have to quote maols post for a comment on that because I don't know which you mean.
