Traded in a base PS4 for a PS4 Pro for this game and was not disappointed.
Well deserved. Kudos to SSM.
Well deserved. Kudos to SSM.
What the hell am I reading? BOTW was a $60 game, combining it with the hardware price is ridiculous and doesn't make sense.
It literally is nonesense, you don't combine the hardware price with a game's, the price of the game in stores is still $60, when the company counts revenue for the game they look at how many units sold and at what price point.make sense because nobody had a Switch the day before BotW so, at launch, to buy the game people needed also to buy the console that they didn't had. Yes, it was available on the wii u, but very few people would have bought a wii u just for it, and there was probably a huge overlap between Wii U owners and Switch early adopters. It sold on the Switch more than the Wii U so i think the assessment is pretty fair and the tie-ratio at launch also speaks for itself.
It literally is nonesense, you don't combine the hardware price with a game's, the price of the game in stores is still $60, when the company counts revenue for the game they look at how many units sold and at what price point.
No one knows except for Nintendo.
And? this has nothing to do with my point? yes, in a technical sense since launch it has been a $60 but my point was never that it wasn't, just that in a practical sense, at launch, it was $360 since the majority of owners needed to buy the hardware to play it while with GoW a lot of the owners probably already owned a PS4 to play it. My point is that context matters which some of you seem to dismiss for no reason. You could say "runner 1 arrived at the goal in 1h, while runner 2 need to 2h to arrive" and with only that information you could think runner 1 is way faster than runner 2, but if the following context is given "runner 1 started the race 4km away from the goal while runner 2 started 10 km away" then the answer "to who is faster?" changes.
Damn! On a much smaller user base too. Looks like Sony has a big hit on their hands thoughNo one knows except for Nintendo.
But it did 7.5 million first 2 months and 2 million first 3 days.
Why would people buy a 300 bucks console without a game?And? this has nothing to do with my point? yes, in a technical sense since launch it has been a $60 but my point was never that it wasn't, just that in a practical sense, at launch, it was $360 since the majority of owners needed to buy the hardware to play it while with GoW a lot of the owners probably already owned a PS4 to play it. My point is that context matters which some of you seem to dismiss for no reason. You could say "runner 1 arrived at the goal in 1h, while runner 2 need to 2h to arrive" and with only that information you could think runner 1 is way faster than runner 2, but if the following context is given "runner 1 started the race 4km away from the goal while runner 2 started 10 km away" then the answer "to who is faster?" changes.
Yes, Sony and Nintendo are killing it this gen, wish MS do the same, more first party games is better.Damn! On a much smaller user base too. Looks like Sony has a big hit on their hands though
Basically, Zelda is a launch title which will limit it's day/month 1 potential. This applies to all games that launch on a console early on and I think people know what you're trying to say.And? this has nothing to do with my point? yes, in a technical sense since launch it has been a $60 but my point was never that it wasn't, just that in a practical sense, at launch, it was $360 since the majority of owners needed to buy the hardware to play it while with GoW a lot of the owners probably already owned a PS4 to play it. My point is that context matters which some of you seem to dismiss for no reason. You could say "runner 1 arrived at the goal in 1h, while runner 2 need to 2h to arrive" and with only that information you could think runner 1 is way faster than runner 2, but if the following context is given "runner 1 started the race 4km away from the goal while runner 2 started 10 km away" then the answer "to who is faster?" changes.
Sounds like Mario beat it tooBasically, Zelda is a launch title which will limit it's day/month 1 potential. This applies to all games that launch on a console early on and I think people know what you're trying to say.
With that said, GoW seems like it beats out most Nintendo games historically save for Smash Brawl and Pokemon. Very impressive first month for the game.
As you've already seen, right now, it did not:
No one knows except for Nintendo.
But it did 7.5 million first 2 months and 2 million first 3 days.
5m in a month. Huh. How do you figure gow sold more?
5m in a month. Huh. How do you figure gow sold more?
Sounds like it did not
I guess you're right. My bad. No way to tell. But gow is up there with a handful of Nintendo exclusive titles that can move a ton of units in a short period of time. Not many exclusives can do thatWe actually don't know how many units Super Mario Odyssey sold in its entire first month on the market.
Historically, Nintendo games aren't frontloaded, I doubt GOW will have legs like Nintendo games haveBasically, Zelda is a launch title which will limit it's day/month 1 potential. This applies to all games that launch on a console early on and I think people know what you're trying to say.
With that said, GoW seems like it beats out most Nintendo games historically save for Smash Brawl and Pokemon. Very impressive first month for the game.
In 2022. 2 years after the PS5 launch :)
The only numbers we have...5m in a month. Huh. How do you figure gow sold more?
Sounds like it did not
What is the context? People bought a Switch and Zelda at launch? How does that make Zelda sales more impressive exactly?And? this has nothing to do with my point? yes, in a technical sense since launch it has been a $60 but my point was never that it wasn't, just that in a practical sense, at launch, it was $360 since the majority of owners needed to buy the hardware to play it while with GoW a lot of the owners probably already owned a PS4 to play it. My point is that context matters which some of you seem to dismiss for no reason. You could say "runner 1 arrived at the goal in 1h, while runner 2 need to 2h to arrive" and with only that information you could think runner 1 is way faster than runner 2, but if the following context is given "runner 1 started the race 4km away from the goal while runner 2 started 10 km away" then the answer "to who is faster?" changes.
Like that haven't been said many times before, I like how you make it sound otherwise.Context is wholly dismissed by some when it doesn't fit their narrative. If I had claimed the Switch is now more successful than Wii and PlayStation 4 in the United States because it sold more units in its first ten months than any home console in history, I would have been laughed out of the room and justifiably so.
Still very impressive.The only numbers we have...
Mario: 2m (3 days), 7.5m (2 months)
GoW: 3.1m (3 days), 5m (1 month)
With these numbers looks like they are close a launch advantage for GoW... if it could sell over 2.5m in the second month then the launch advantage carried.
Like that haven't been said many times before, I like how you make it sound otherwise.
Or even a season pass or DLC (which I'd gladly take for this game, don't get me wrong). But this is a rare old-school single player game with the good ole business model from the offline gaming era.
If Spider-Man gets above 93 on metacritic, it will outsell God of War. I will keep saying this. This is supported by what Benji observation with tracking. When games gets above 93 on metacritic, its sales tends to explode.
I think GoW may slow down faster because of competition from many games (Detroit for example releasing now) and not having a period like BF or holidays when consoles and games usually sell more than in spring or summer.The only numbers we have... i think
The only numbers we have...
Mario: 2m (3 days), 7.5m (2 months)
GoW: 3.1m (3 days), 5m (1 month)
With these numbers looks like they are close a launch advantage for GoW... if it could sell over 2.5m in the second month then the launch advantage carried.
Mario: 2m (3 days), 7.5m (2 months)
GoW: 3.1m (3 days), 5m (1 month)
With these numbers looks like they are close a launch advantage for GoW... if it could sell over 2.5m in the second month then the launch advantage carried.
This is insane.
We need a list of top performing developers in this industry.
Naughty Dog
Game Freak
Nintendo EAD Tokyo
Sony Santa Monica
who did I forget?
Oh god how could I forget haha.
The only numbers we have...
Mario: 2m (3 days), 7.5m (2 months)
GoW: 3.1m (3 days), 5m (1 month)
With these numbers looks like they are close a launch advantage for GoW... if it could sell over 2.5m in the second month then the launch advantage carried.
The only numbers we have...
Mario: 2m (3 days), 7.5m (2 months)
GoW: 3.1m (3 days), 5m (1 month)
With these numbers looks like they are close a launch advantage for GoW... if it could sell over 2.5m in the second month then the launch advantage carried.
Where did you see that, the only source i see is 7.5 million from end of october to beginning of feburary.
Nah, Nintendo himself annunced it sold 2 million first 3 days.
Give me God of War 2 in 2020. Don't even care about it being on the PS5. Sooner we get the sequel, the better, and that's only possible if it's PS4. They can finish the trilogy on PS5.
Do it for the people.
Ubisoft have been killing it this gen too, pretty much constant great selling games every year.This is insane.
We need a list of top performing developers in this industry.
Naughty Dog
Game Freak
Nintendo EAD Tokyo
Sony Santa Monica
who did I forget?
Only if it wasn't true, nothing wrong to compare sales launch aligned and see which is doing better.Any user that would claim this shouldn't be taken seriously. Same as the type of user who looks at a single month of data with zero context and comes to some of the conclusions made in this thread.
Incredible sales.
With this kind of success, I think it is actually a mistake not to have ANY post launch content addons for this game. People would surely like to play more stuff.
Probably not, I was just comparing the actual data we have based on what others were posting.Historically, Nintendo games aren't frontloaded, I doubt GOW will have legs like Nintendo games have
Only if it wasn't true, nothing wrong to compare sales launch aligned and see which is doing better.