'on their initial console releases'.
It's true, there's a Pro patch that came DkS3 at a later date though, yeah.
'on their initial console releases'.
I love how people now pretend that Souls games are by default 60 fps when the majority of players finished all of the SoulsBorne games in fairly unstable 30 fps.
Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, Bloodborne and Dark Souls 3 are all shoddy 30fps on their initial console releases.
Only the Dark Souls 2: SotFS port to PS4/XBO was 60fps.
When I was your age we had FIVE frames per second in Blighttown, an we liked it!
When I was your age we had FIVE frames per second in Blighttown, an we liked it!
Probably an inference from Bethesda not congratulating itself in sales. The inference is that indies are doing well and talking about it in releases and anyone not releasing PR statements about how well they are doing are selling terrible.Where is this asspull that DOOM Switch didn't do well coming from?
Like, there's nothing that suggests that at all...
I mean, relatively speaking of course. The game didn't light up the charts when it released everywhere else either. I'm sure it did just fine for Bethesda's expectations.
You'll get (almost) 720p docked and 540p handheld at badly framepaced 30 and you'll like it. At least for DS3, DS2 might fair just like DS1 since it's still a PS360 game.I would take these games in 540p if they were 60fps on Switch.
Well, it is slower, but not performance-wise, it actually seemed a little more solid to me, or maybe it's just the same but as you move slower, it's less noticeable.BloodBorne is 30fps?
Well, what amazing 30fps that was..... I haver DS3 but never plyed because some people told me it was slower and different than bloodborne. SO I'm afraid I won't like it. The first game on my ps4 that I really adored.
Well, it is slower, but not performance-wise, it actually seemed a little more solid to me, or maybe it's just the same but as you move slower, it's less noticeable.
Just because it's slower and different though, I don't get it? Surely you play tons of games that aren't like Bloodborne, seeing as DkS3 is literally the game most like Bloodborne ever made.
Oh, you are going to play it, that's cool.You can't understand because bloodborne has a really special place in my mind. I reeeeeeaaaally like it. Play something that's similar but worse... Maybe I'm crazy, but I want the game to have a special place in my memory. As soon as I finish Persona 5, DS3 will be my next game.
On the contrary, it would require more cutbacks than Doom.Depending on how optimized the engine is in the first place, it shouldn't require as many cutbacks as DOOM.
I'm still conflicted as to whether to get these on PS4 or Switch... love the portability but it might be an odd experience for a game I get so intensely engrossed with as Souls. Guess I'll just wait for reviews.
BB drops below 30 pretty often. Still, it's one of my favorites ever and further proof that 60fps or die is just a dumb way to look at gaming. Sure, it would be better if it was 60 but anyone who calls that game unplayable is out of their minds.
Probably an inference from Bethesda not congratulating itself in sales. The inference is that indies are doing well and talking about it in releases and anyone not releasing PR statements about how well they are doing are selling terrible.
But look at FIFA. No PR statements until recently that it's doing decent.
My thought is that we don't know and most larger publishers/devs are being quiet. But Indies are doing well and getting the word out. They are actively building a market. Releasing a lot of games, thanking the community, interacting. But they have to. They can't bank on a 3 million unit seller. It's great. I love the competition and the effort by indies.
On topic: I'll buy them. Never played them but I'm interested.
Lol, have you ever played a 60fps game before?BloodBorne is 30fps?
Well, what amazing 30fps that was..... I haver DS3 but never plyed because some people told me it was slower and different than bloodborne. SO I'm afraid I won't like it. The first game on my ps4 that I really adored.
Yep, FROM just announced Switch is actually capable of running the pre-downgrade version that PC/PS4/XB1 couldn't. Dark Souls 2: Need Torch To See Shit Edition exclusive to Switch.
No chance. PS4/XBO already has SotFS. They won't release a second Remaster on the same systems, that would be insane.Dark Souls 2 will probably released in similar fashion to Dark Souls Remastered. Meaning not actually a Switch exclusive and reworked/optimized for current systems.
So yes there's a chance we'll get a predowngrade version on the capable consoles and I'm sure the Switch version will do just fine.
BloodBorne is 30fps?
Well, what amazing 30fps that was..... I haver DS3 but never plyed because some people told me it was slower and different than bloodborne. SO I'm afraid I won't like it. The first game on my ps4 that I really adored.
Easy, get Dark SOULS 3 on anything but Switch.I'm still conflicted as to whether to get these on PS4 or Switch... love the portability but it might be an odd experience for a game I get so intensely engrossed with as Souls. Guess I'll just wait for reviews.
No chance. PS4/XBO already has SotFS. They won't release a second Remaster on the same systems, that would be insane.
Also, this 'pre-downgrade' version is never going to happen. That whole lighting model was dropped, and it wasn't even reinstated when being released on consoles that were colossally more powerful. They're not going to reinstate/complete it for a Switch version.
The term remaster has been used for all sorts of things. Dark Souls 2 being a remaster is a tough call because they did change a bunch of stuff, but technologically what they did was the same thing GTAV did, or TLoU, or the Uncharted Trilogy, or any of the other traditionally labelled 'Remaster'.SotFS is a remaster? Didn't they just add new content and update the graphics to current consoles? I would say it's more of a Game of the Year edition than a 'remaster'.
A actual remaster like Dark Souls is using the DS3 engine. So I don't see why they won't explore bringing back the lighting system if they're actually gonna bother selling it as a remaster (hypothetically).
Would buy.The twist: Early rumor was a misunderstanding, FROM is actually doing the DS3 Switch port with the DS1 engine. :lol
Cool, I guess. Looks like the remaster/porting trend is going to continue heavily even on to the Nintendo Switch :-\
I've never understand the disdain for remasters.Ugh. Can anybody actually point out some negatives about porting/remasters?
On topic I'm rather excited to get the trilogy on Switch. I haven't finished 1 and I never played 2 or 3.
And that's a bad thing?Cool, I guess. Looks like the remaster/porting trend is going to continue heavily even on to the Nintendo Switch :-\
That would be pretty funny if Worst Souls got remastered twice and was still the worst one.Dark Souls 2 will probably released in similar fashion to Dark Souls Remastered. Meaning not actually a Switch exclusive and reworked/optimized for current systems.
So yes there's a chance we'll get a predowngrade version on the capable consoles and I'm sure the Switch version will do just fine.
Is your avatar Amy Acker?That would be pretty funny if Worst Souls got remastered twice and was still the worst one.
indeed
Rather fetching, quite.
When I was your age we had FIVE frames per second in Blighttown, an we liked it!
Necro beg! No and no. And Dark Souls is coming to Switch, so hopefully that is quenching enough for you.I was going to/may start a thread on this, but have we heard anymore info on this and is there any possibility that From's next teased titled will also make it's way to Switch?
The thought of Dark Souls on the go has me thirsty.
Have the platforms been announced for From's next title?Necro beg! No and no. And Dark Souls is coming to Switch, so hopefully that is quenching enough for you.