it's only 36 TF
lel
XSX is roughly equivelant to 17.25 TF GCN
and for lockhart, 4 TF would be 5.75 TF (so lockhart, if it exists, would probably be 4.2TF or higher as it doesn't fully line up with X1X)
PS5 @ 9.2 TF would be 13.225 TF
also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
Thank you!XSX is roughly equivelant to 17.25 TF GCN
and for lockhart, 4 TF would be 5.75 TF (so lockhart, if it exists, would probably be 4.2TF or higher as it doesn't fully line up with X1X)
PS5 @ 9.2 TF would be 13.225 TF
also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
XSX is roughly equivelant to 17.25 TF GCN
and for lockhart, 4 TF would be 5.75 TF (so lockhart, if it exists, would probably be 4.2TF or higher as it doesn't fully line up with X1X)
PS5 @ 9.2 TF would be 13.225 TF
also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
I actually estimated 25% so I was wrong but in the grand scheme of things 40% boost from GCN to RDNA is magnificent!
...I still can't believe that MS ever publicly referred to territories as tier 2. That is such a huge marketing mistake that it still surprises me 7 years later. Even if objectively from a stock standpoint you need to launch in several stages and prioritise higher margin regions than others, its definitely not a thing you would phrase the way they did.Personally I don't think it would be $299 at launch or that it wouldn't have a disc drive. The point of a lower cost machine is to keep the latest and greatest a little more accessible for those "tier 2" countries and emerging economies , who are extremely unlikely to have a 4K requirement. A lack of disc drive isn't going to facilitate those migrating from an Xbox One in those specific places.
XSX is roughly equivelant to 17.25 TF GCN
and for lockhart, 4 TF would be 5.75 TF (so lockhart, if it exists, would probably be 4.2TF or higher as it doesn't fully line up with X1X)
PS5 @ 9.2 TF would be 13.225 TF
also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
They did announce 15%+ IPC RDNA1 to RDNA2? Do we have a link or slide or sound bit?also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
Pfff I'm tired.. I think so too.... Honestly i forgot that i responded to you lmao.. Was a surprise that you quoted me... Sorry for that.i thought it was pretty clear, i think you meant to quote my previous post regarding 399 or 499 ps5 vs 299/499 xbox /s/x?
What about my post did you get that i was anything other than relaxed? Strange way to communicate.. Honestly i got more of a problem how you are phrasing that "mistake" lol.It literally says no matter what mistakes Sony could make it would still dominate worldwide. I think Sony is swell too but, like...you gotta relax fam lol
While AMD officially said 25% vega to RDNA1, if we compare to Polaris, its around 30% from all the tests i saw, and polaris is more relevant considering 1) it has 40CU chip so the comparison is better 2) the pro consoles uses polarisi think you were only about .5 TF off the mark so it's not that bad
it's 43.75% improvement (25% improvement on GCN + 15% improvement on RDNA1)
Didn't klee say both were rdna on his spec sheet?My tinfoil hat theory if the PS5 ends up being 9.2 would be that the insiders that said the XSX was slightly weaker than the PS5 saw the 13 GCN number for PS5 and the 12 TF RDNA2 number for the Series X and didn't know the technical differences.
I just really doubt that any console game developer is going to keep developing for 1080p as the main resolution when they have GPUs with 9-12 TFLOPS to play with. Not to mention that it is harder to buy a 1080p TV these days then a 4k TV just due to most manufacturers having phased 1080p out as 4k panels get cheaper and cheaper. Even the best looking Sony exclusives from this last generation took advantage of the extra resolution power given by the PS4 Pro instead of just ramping graphic affects.That only works as long no Sony dev simply starts lowering their internal resolution to boost the graphics. Sure the lockhart could possibly do the same @1080p as the Series X in native 4k but what if you design a game in 1080P and use the whole TFs to up the graphics up to 11?
Series X could do the same but Lockhart couldn't. I don't think ms would want to see sub 720p on their new shiny console just to compete with sony.
I don't know why some are going to so much length to make PS5 9.2tf....
While AMD officially said 25% vega to RDNA1, if we compare to Polaris, its around 30% from all the tests i saw, and polaris is more relevant considering 1) it has 40CU chip so the comparison is better 2) the pro consoles uses polaris
Yup...
I don't know why some are going to so much length to make PS5 9.2tf....
I didn't know he said that, just trying to figure out how the Insiders could have gotten things wrong if the PS5 specs end up below what they said they were.
XSX is roughly equivelant to 17.25 TF GCN
and for lockhart, 4 TF would be 5.75 TF (so lockhart, if it exists, would probably be 4.2TF or higher as it doesn't fully line up with X1X)
PS5 @ 9.2 TF would be 13.225 TF
also MykhellMikado sorry you were right they did announce 15% perf improvement over RDNA1
I actually estimated 25% so I was wrong but in the grand scheme of things 40% boost from GCN to RDNA is magnificent!
When did you see any statistic of perf/flop?i think you were only about .5 TF off the mark so it's not that bad
it's 43.75% improvement (25% improvement on GCN + 15% improvement on RDNA1)
Cool!Just a request to everyone. While 4chan rumors aren't explicitly disallowed, we ask that you not use direct links to 4chan. Just grab screencaps.
Oh come on we all know why.
The mental gymnastics must be tiring.
That would fail. If it's an accessory it does nothing for sales. Look at HD DVD drive.
it really should have a disc drive. It's too cheap to cut for how much impact it would have on its target market, cost-conscious consumers.
I didn't know he said that, just trying to figure out how the Insiders could have gotten things wrong if the PS5 specs end up below what they said they were.
Or perhaps they got things right and github didn't tell us the whole story...hmmmm possibility?I didn't know he said that, just trying to figure out how the Insiders could have gotten things wrong if the PS5 specs end up below what they said they were.
What mental gymnastics am I performing? If the PS5 ends up being below 12 Teraflops then he either had bad info or lied, so I'm trying to figure out why that happened.
Or perhaps they got things right and github didn't tell us the whole story...hmmmm possibility?
I know he did for Series X. He did say both companies talk only RDNA now tho.
yes so stop making calculation from assedit: we do have improved IPC but no confirmed number as shown here https://images.anandtech.com/doci/15591/Navi2x_PPW.png
You're trying to figure out why something happened that hasn't happened yet. Just so we're clear.
No explicit numbers, but, can be deducted that the number was >12.No insiders aside from Klee has given any numbers PS5.
Which he said 10+ everyone else they are close or one has slight edge over the other .
So when the PS5 number comes out we will see what they mean by close.
Pfff I'm tired.. I think so too.... Honestly i forgot that i responded to you lmao.. Was a surprise that you quoted me... Sorry for that.
What about my post did you get that i was anything other than relaxed? Strange way to communicate.. Honestly i got more of a problem how you are phrasing that "mistake" lol.
Definitely time for a class action! These microaggressions will not stand, man!It`s deeply offending that statement. It implies PS5 is not for us but for our children. We have been buying all gamesystems there is up until now and feel the PS5 is OURS and we are entitled to feel this and not hand it off to those new gamers.
Can we Sue? Asking for a friend.
No explicit numbers, but, can be deducted that the number was >12.
- Both above 10
- PS5 slightly more powerful in TF
- Both RDNA
- Not surprised after the 12TF announcement from MS, his previous statements did not change
Maybe that's what will force them into revealing it. Let's make the placeholder ps5 as ugly as possible that the general public will start thinking that's what it actually looks like, forcing Sony's hand.I wonder Sony execs think when they see that leaked ugly-looking dev kit everywhere as the face of their next-gen console.
I am speculating possible outcomes.... in the speculation thread.
Jason Schreier did say they were both targeting over Stadia's TF number (not performance metric). So we can infer > 10.7TF (number).Oh i know i mostly talking about the others that say they close and give no number .
When PS5 specs drop we will see what they mean and if they were right.
Maybe that's what will force them into revealing it. Let's make the placeholder ps5 as ugly as possible that the general public will start thinking that's what it actually looks like, forcing Sony's hand.
Blind defense? meant to misread the situation? Dude wtf...I found the unfounded blind defense funny 🤷🏾♂️ Also, "You gotta relax" is just a phrase. Just means slow down for a second. Or maybe you meant to completely misread the situation in which case, have a blast!
Jason Schreier did say they were both targeting over Stadia's TF number (not performance metric). So we can infer > 10.7TF (number).
He also said they were really close and above 2080 super performance.
So two who 'gave' us a number range.
I think the reason they haven't released anything yet is because they don't feel they have to.
PS4 is having an absolutely corking year. Dreams, FFVII, Last of US 2 and GoT are all going to absolutely destroy it, PS4 is likely to be >110 million units by years end.
They are in the driving seat here, they have nothing to prove.
I wouldn't take their silence as indicative of anything, they are in the driving seat when it comes to next gen.
Nvidia has always had the better tech in the GPU space, not sure what you mean by earning our dollars. And ya, 7nm happened, that's why we'll be seeing big gains in performance.WTF? Did we suddenly turn a corner on GPU gains or something? Is AMD getting competitive with RDNA finally forcing Nvidia to work for our dollars in earnest?
Blind defense? meant to misread the situation? Dude wtf...
yeah if there is one that needs to calm down and step back it's probably you... I have no clue why you are upset but wow....
I think the reason they haven't released anything yet is because they don't feel they have to.
PS4 is having an absolutely corking year. Dreams, FFVII, Last of US 2 and GoT are all going to absolutely destroy it, PS4 is likely to be >110 million units by years end.
They are in the driving seat here, they have nothing to prove.
I wouldn't take their silence as indicative of anything, they are in the driving seat when it comes to next gen.
I wonder Sony execs think when they see that leaked ugly-looking dev kit everywhere as the face of their next-gen console.
Tinfoil hat theory or wishful thinking? We might never find out.My tinfoil hat theory if the PS5 ends up being 9.2 would be that the insiders that said the XSX was slightly weaker than the PS5 saw the 13 GCN number for PS5 and the 12 TF RDNA2 number for the Series X and didn't know the technical differences.
I think the reason they haven't released anything yet is because they don't feel they have to.
PS4 is having an absolutely corking year. Dreams, FFVII, Last of US 2 and GoT are all going to absolutely destroy it, PS4 is likely to be >110 million units by years end.
They are in the driving seat here, they have nothing to prove.
I wouldn't take their silence as indicative of anything, they are in the driving seat when it comes to next gen.
I said this last week and caught a ban for days. Even thought it's basic knowledge. 🤣no matter how hot MS comes out, or what mistakes sony makes with ps5 (don't read into this statement - its to make a point only), playstation is surely going to dominate worldwide next gen too.