Not sure about Yuta since he had that post + vote and nothing since. I could see you doing it though.Do you think Yuta/my reads on you are genuine? You don't think either of us is scum taking advantage of meta?
What Fate said earlier is right - it feels premature to say anyone is ghosting the thread less than 24 hours into the game.
That said, who would you push for ghosting the thread? If you're suggesting it, you must feel someone fits the bill?
Was Anex town or scum in their first game?Anex put in great work last game, day 1 here seems very similar to last time.
Blarg ghosting this early is weird, not a scum tell but definitely NOT a solid scum tell (Could also be the weekend start though).
LP isn't giving me scum vibes either, Day 1 defending someone against meta reads is pretty Null, some players lean into meta really hard through the shit posts, some don't.
On the whole Sneeks thing, It really seems to me like a meta read, which is fine for the first 24 hours I guess. We all know this day will turn into an absolute shit show with 5 minutes to go on the clock when people decide to claim day 1 and everyone scrambles.
Shit, I lost last game. Time to change it up!Anex put in great work last game, day 1 here seems very similar to last time.
You gonna play bad this time? lol
I guess it's more of a Wee/Sneeks, Sneeks/Yuta situation.
Yeah, hoping someone helicopters my ass out at the last second 👀
like who?
ephi no bullyPoor Neki, so full of anxiety and regret he has to say it twice :(
Not sure about Yuta since he had that post + vote and nothing since. I could see you doing it though.
I do not. My analysis on shit posting is not as good as others in this department and people always seem to talk about how much can be gleaned from day 1 but I always fail to see it. I'm more of a vote records and late EoD vote movement kind of analysis person.
It is a reference to voting Sneeks, wee or anybody else who generates many interactions. Day 1 always is a complete guess in the dark, I think we should either vote for people who do not generate many interactions or people who we'll need to forcefully check at some point anyway (Blarg or jman, the latter has been a while since I played with him the last time though, so that could have changed by now)
Anex was town, and I don't agree with the people's meta reads on you.Not sure about Yuta since he had that post + vote and nothing since. I could see you doing it though.
Was Anex town or scum in their first game?
but do you agree with people's meta reads on me? 👀
Like Zipped, Bojack, HP, Ephi, Leo, Royal, LP or Blarg.
It's both. I'm worried people read my posts as tryhard/not genuine even though I am just playing and it can't help but make me think I'm doing something wrong. That's more of a personal thing that I want to fix but I can also see scum taking advantage of this and pushing it to try and get me voted out since it would save them a NK.ephi no bully
yeah I totally would do thatHmm, ok fair enough. Your response sounded like you thought these were genuine concerns about your playstyle, as opposed to wee thinking the same arguments are being used against her by scum. I suppose it's too early to say either way (in broth you and wee's cases).
This is what happens when I explain who I am voting for and who I am willing to switch to before EoD, people say it's hedging but I'd rather explain it now before you need to ask than later. At this point it'd be me easier to not respond to anyone because I'm either hedging or I'm making excuses or I'm afraid of looking bad.Isn't this like the unspoken rule of mafia? Everyone phones it in, votes out some random person with a vanilla claim, and then the next day we try to squeeze water from the rock that is D1.
This isn't filler because you'll hit the post quota, so it almost sounds like hedging. Like if your D1 isn't great, you already said why.
It's not scummy, but I'm going to file this away for later.
Why?Yeah I'm just going to say I will be very surprised if there is a cult in this game.
Why?
Why?
Why?
Because they don't provide much information to work with, so better to get to them while we have options, rather than when it's too late as has too often happened already.
Vote: malus
dislike the grouping he did earlier and I disagree with the ATP scumread imo. giving me scummy vibes
It's both. I'm worried people read my posts as tryhard/not genuine even though I am just playing and it can't help but make me think I'm doing something wrong. That's more of a personal thing that I want to fix but I can also see scum taking advantage of this and pushing it to try and get me voted out since it would save them a NK.
Because they don't provide much information to work with, so better to get to them while we have options, rather than when it's too late as has too often happened already.
[pupils shaking]
if malus flips town, then this part should be looked atI kind've take issue with this list, at least with your "why" in mind.
Not just because I'm in it.
Probably.
I don't propose to vote them out right now. There's still plenty of time for people to show up, but if by EoD there's still nothing to work with it's at least worth a thought.I kind've take issue with this list, at least with your "why" in mind.
Not just because I'm in it.
Probably.
Leo at least probably shouldn't be there. I feel like in games I've read of his he ends up putting a decent amount down to look through.
Bojack too. He had me convinced he was town in whoops all scum, but I don't really feel the reason to narrow in on him would have been low posting.
People always say LP and Blarg will out in time, I'm not entirely sure I believe that anymore but including them on the policy vote list seems a bit meh.
Zipped, sure, I've seen enough games where he's barely there. HP, sure (sorry dude). Me, eeeeh. You, sure.
Royal, well, not a clue there.
He might only have made a few posts but he seems self assured, asssertive. Not entirely sure how I feel about him flat out telling us what we're going to be doing yet, maybe that's just his style. Not entirely sure I agree with the approach of keeping in talking points despite suspicion versus voting out inactives because they're annoying to deal with, but "vote out the people not talking that you can't follow anywhere tomorrow" never has never seemed like a persuasive argument to me so that's not really surprising.
As in low posters you want to hear from or Low posters in general? I'm just curious why Malus is a top low poster to vote out, when it could easily be me, or LP, or Leo, or Royal?its between jman and malus now for the low posters
if malus flips town, then this part should be looked at
scum!ephidel will try to gasp onto anything
Dude. Did you read the whole post of mine?
because having just DONE a game with cult, I would just be surprised if a cult shows up in ANY game from now on. That shit was hard. So next time a cult does show up I will be pleasantly (or more likely unpleasantly) surprised.
To be clear, I can look at the post counts and figure out who the low posters are. I am asking Neki who he feels is worth pursuing in that list, because he brought it up as an idea and I want to hear his reasoning.
I might mean, what sneeks said, not atp, i dunno, whoever said it.
Games don't get played in the order they're designed, right? Ultimately the fact we just played a cult game doesn't mean there weren't others in the cooker along with them. I'm not saying this is going to be one or that we should be worrying about it but you having just run one doesn't take that set of tools out of the toolbox.because having just DONE a game with cult, I would just be surprised if a cult shows up in ANY game from now on. That shit was hard. So next time a cult does show up I will be pleasantly (or more likely unpleasantly) surprised.
I was half joking but go on then. Who would you put into a town core right now and why?
Games don't get played in the order they're designed, right? Ultimately the fact we just played a cult game doesn't mean there weren't others in the cooker along with them. I'm not saying this is going to be one or that we should be worrying about it but you having just run one doesn't take that set of tools out of the toolbox.
Honestly I had completely forgotten that Jman is in this game.i'm not liking malus leaving jman out of his low posters and also the stuff atp said about him i agree with.
Makes sense to ask zipped about me. He and ATP ran last game, which was my first game. Probably has the most potential for insight of anyone in the game.Why single out Zipped specifically? And why anex, LP, and Blarg specifically?
To gain more insight into the reasoning behind statements.
Ephi and having it in for me... name a more iconic duo LOLI kind've take issue with this list, at least with your "why" in mind.
Not just because I'm in it.
Probably.
Leo at least probably shouldn't be there. I feel like in games I've read of his he ends up putting a decent amount down to look through.
Bojack too. He had me convinced he was town in whoops all scum, but I don't really feel the reason to narrow in on him would have been low posting.
People always say LP and Blarg will out in time, I'm not entirely sure I believe that anymore but including them on the policy vote list seems a bit meh.
Zipped, sure, I've seen enough games where he's barely there. HP, sure (sorry dude). Me, eeeeh. You, sure.
Royal, well, not a clue there.
He might only have made a few posts but he seems self assured, asssertive. Not entirely sure how I feel about him flat out telling us what we're going to be doing yet, maybe that's just his style. Not entirely sure I agree with the approach of keeping in talking points despite suspicion versus voting out inactives because they're annoying to deal with, but "vote out the people not talking that you can't follow anywhere tomorrow" never has never seemed like a persuasive argument to me so that's not really surprising.
LOL. So trueHp seems okay to me so far, its when he starts sheeping someone else's reads and thoughts you need to watch out, tho there is still plenty of time for that
Zipped, because he requires direction on d1, he seldom has any of his own. I also gave a summary already of my thoughts on his response.Why single out Zipped specifically? And why anex, LP, and Blarg specifically?
Has nothing to do when the games were created. It has to do with the difficulty in creating a cult game was for me and that when @ATP and I were doing that it is recommended it be classified as Bastard.Games don't get played in the order they're designed, right? Ultimately the fact we just played a cult game doesn't mean there weren't others in the cooker along with them. I'm not saying this is going to be one or that we should be worrying about it but you having just run one doesn't take that set of tools out of the toolbox.