Amidst all this hoopla, I'm really pretty annoyed with Rosenstein at the moment. He's once again lending his name to some bullshit (first time being that Comey firing letter) and shielding Barr in a decision that he shouldn't even be a part of in the first place because he was involved in the events surrounding obstruction! What a hack.
Soon id hope.So when do we march on Washington to demand the full report is released?
I'm pretty annoyed with Rosenstein at the moment. He's once again lending his name to some bullshit and shielding Barr in a decision that he shouldn't even be a part of in the first place because he was involved in the events surrounding obstruction! What a hack.
"It's hard to imagine that something so explosive and central to the mission of his investigation wouldn't be addressed either in charges against someone (Manafort or others) or in a report," Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, wrote in an email. "And the fact that the special counsel hasn't brought it out but it was only revealed inadvertently, reinforces the idea that [Mueller] is saving it for something else."
That "something else" could be anything from a line in Mueller's report to an entire conspiracy charge. "My money is on Mueller including the Manafort efforts as part of the 'case' alleging Trump campaign collaboration with the Russians," Patrick Cotter, a former federal prosecutor who specialized in organized crime, told me in an email. "The question then is, what is the best way to make that case? For myself, I believe a RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] indictment would be the appropriate vehicle to bring such a case: charge the campaign as the 'racketeering enterprise' and name Trump, Manafort and the rest of the gang as members of the enterprise … straight out of the mob prosecution playbook."
Cotter, who is familiar with Mueller's by-the-book style but has no direct knowledge of his internal plans, said Mueller is more likely to take the "safer route"—laying out all the facts that would support such a case in a report, "but not actually charging the legally plausible but politically nuclear formal criminal case." Any RICO indictment against the campaign for a conspiracy with Russia "would be the new definition of bold and cutting edge." The former federal prosecutor Jeffrey Cramer agreed that Mueller could bring a conspiracy case and name Manafort and others as unindicted co-conspirators—but if the evidence doesn't rise to the level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, it will likely just be outlined in the report.
Jump on some tables and watch some Beto speeches until your calves can't take it anymore.
So when do we march on Washington to demand the full report is released?
I'm pretty confident that the US has Assange or someone from wikileaks and will announce it tomorrow at a news conference. No tweets from them since the plane left London
I'm talking about the structure of the Senate itself. As time goes on the in the US most of the population will be concentrated in a few large states while a bunch of low populated small states will have most of the Senate. The Senate is already kind of like this but it will just get worse. I remember reading some estimates that say by 2040 30% of the US population will control 70% of the Senate.
Forma did several hours ago too:Bernie is publicly calling for a release of the full report immediately. Good on him.
Congress voted 420-0 to release the full Mueller report. Not a "summary" from his handpicked Attorney General. AG Barr, make the full report public. Immediately.
I'm in a bad head space, friends.
Rationally I know we have a good shot at beating Trump, but toda
Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:
1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There's a lot more to see here.
2. This is the best (worst) possible reading of a really bad report by Republicans being cowardly and the main thing to hang your hat on are the remaining investigations. (Southpaw)
3. Mueller was never going to do an actual investigation and he was only running out the clock while the Russian mob took over the US Government and consolidated power under a fascist puppet. (Kendzior)
I, uh, am going with #1.
Evan Pérez @evanperez
After issuing his summary of Mueller's report, AG Bill Barr went to mass at St Peter's in Capitol Hill.
6:08 PM - Mar 24, 2019
And Pete:
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1
Pete Buttigieg calls for the release of the full Mueller report on @MSNBC.
5:35 PM - Mar 24, 2019
I'm really happy because I'm at a music festival this weekend with my wife. It's been a lot easier to disconnect than usual. I've been in a state of dread since Friday, but taking breaks and checking in only when I've got time has helped. My gut instinct would have been to hit refresh all weekend and be in a constant panic. Obviously 'go to a music festival with your wife' isn't actionable advice. But taking a break sure is.I'm in a bad head space, friends.
Rationally I know we have a good shot at beating Trump, but today hurt my morale.
All I can think of is laughing at the crushed hearts of Romney supporters on right wing forums during election night in 2012.
They just knew Obama was done for.
I've been playing Sekiro lol. Was just hoping for better news.I'm really happy because I'm at a music festival this weekend with my wife. It's been a lot easier to disconnect than usual. I've been in a state of dread since Friday, but taking breaks and checking in only when I've got time has helped. My gut instinct would have been to hit refresh all weekend and be in a constant panic. Obviously 'go to a music festival with your wife' isn't actionable advice. But taking a break sure is.
I'm in a bad head space, friends.
Rationally I know we have a good shot at beating Trump, but today hurt my morale.
All I can think of is laughing at the crushed hearts of Romney supporters on right wing forums during election night in 2012.
They just knew Obama was done for.
I get this, but it's also like, you know that this was never going to be a silver bullet. Even if it was "there was collusion", it wouldn't be a silver bullet. If/when the report gets fully released, it'll probably be a bit more damning than Barr's summary but probably not enough for impeachment. So everyone on both sides will take what they want and not a lot will change and Trump will probably be right back where we started.I'm in a bad head space, friends.
Rationally I know we have a good shot at beating Trump, but today hurt my morale.
All I can think of is laughing at the crushed hearts of Romney supporters on right wing forums during election night in 2012.
They just knew Obama was done for.
twas me.Like someone in here said earlier, in two months we won't even be talking about this. Once the 4th of July hits, this will be three or four news cycles away.
I got to play 30 goddamn minutes of Sekiro before we had to leave. I'm almost jealous! It's been a lot of fun. Every year 400+ bands come and take over downtown Boise, and we wander around and get drunk for a few days. It's great!I've been playing Sekiro lol. Was just hoping for better news.
Hope that festival is sick tho ❤️
Pamela Brown @PamelaBrownCNN
NEW:
The special counsel's office deliberated at length with DOJ officials about issuing a subpoena for President Donald Trump to be interviewed, but ultimately the decision was made not to move forward, according to source @LauraAJarrett @evanperez
6:15 PM - Mar 24, 2019
Pamela Brown @PamelaBrownCNN
NEW:
The special counsel's office deliberated at length with DOJ officials about issuing a subpoena for President Donald Trump to be interviewed, but ultimately the decision was made not to move forward, according to source @LauraAJarrett @evanperez
6:15 PM - Mar 24, 2019
Democrats did ask him about it and he stonewalled them. Dems are powerless to do anything when they don't have a majority in the SenateIf it was so clear this is what Barr was brought in to do then why did his confirmation come and go without asserting this is what would happen. Why were they so soft during his confirmation
If the situation was reversed the GOP would have smeared someone getting into Barr's position from the get go
Ya I was giving him the benefit of the doubt for a long time now, but he's shown his true colors. Pretty disappointing.To be fair, he showed alot more spine than 99.99% of republicans, Trump throwing Rosenstein under the bus for the firing of comey must have genuinely pissed him off, and we wouldn't have gotten the mueller investigation without him.
But he turned back into your prototype republican last week, said we should expect bar to act in Barr in good faith, all that none sense that's objectively false.
But after being stonewalled it was almost shrugged offDemocrats did ask him about it and he stonewalled them. Dems are powerless to do anything when they don't have a majority in the Senate
Democrats are really bad at getting the media to buy what they are selling. Republicans can go on TV and act insane every day, but the second a Dem went on TV talking about how Barr is a corrupt pick, the media would be attacking them asking what evidence they had.But after being stonewalled it was almost shrugged off
House GOP members were more ready and willing to discredit and smear a nobody who is going to prison like Cohen just to try and control the narrative so that anything that went against them they were prepared for.. than we were prepared to do for someone who is now in control of the justice department and the top cop in the country. They were absolutely not sounding the fire alarms that *the fix is in* during this process, like they should have if this is the narrative they are going to go with now