-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 1| THE ANTI BENGHAZI (Read Staff Post)
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
I should check if these are OTC, I tend to have serious sleeping difficulties whenever things get stressful (and I have anxiety so that's all the time!)
all of them are over the counter in the united states. ZZZQuil is literally just Benadryl lol.
It felt so stupid at the time, but, hey, of all the POTYs they've picked, holy shit this one has fucked up the planet more than any other in decades.
We're a little finicky in EuroLand but yeah Melatonin pills at least *should* be OTC.
Gonna give them a whirl
Honestly, between the two the Warren one feels more serious as she's the only one with a shot at winning at the moment. Klobb feels like they were throwing a stone to a handful of editors who wanted a more establishment pick.
Ok i have several pie graphs going but endorsing Amy and Liz is a double Liz endorsement because Amy siphons votes from Joe and Liz is already Liz! She is Liz and shes slithering to the top!
If people just voted -- but they're being conditioned not to.
Last edited:
yeah honestly Amy rising risks syphoning Biden's grip on moderate and conservative white Dems, which are still a substantial part of his electorate. might not be an issue in Iowa when she doesn't cross 15% in most places but certainly might be an issue in other states.
OP
OP
Not sure which is more hilarious, The NYT Ed board endorsing two people, or several pages of people on pins and needles waiting for the announcement
its not pins and needles, lol, it's the traditional poliera pastime of live tweeting the television
17% is the top rate. Mostly they let many public firms operate essentially as corporations (especially the MTR, which owns a ton of real estate/malls including the largest skyscrapers in the city) which collect a ton of revenue on their own from rent, etc. But the govt is engaged in development/investment at pretty much all times.
It isn't. If someone says you did something you didn't do, how are you supposed to meaningfully refute it but to say, "I didn't say that."?
Anything less would have been taken as hedging and a tacit admission to something of which he was accused.
Same here. A while back I called it 'responsible capitalism.'
Oh please, I've never heard anyone talk about watching that show before, but when they have this endorsement there are PAGES waiting for it.
okay buddy, sure, it's not that it was an hour long stream that people were watching and posting annoying posts throughout that I have explicitly been instructed to stop reporting because there is, and I quote, "no rule against livetweeting the television," it must be that poliera posters are completely obsessed with who the New York Times endorses
somebody is definitely unhealthily obsessed with what somebody else is doing here, I agree
Ahem, I'll have you know a lot of us have NO lives whatsoever and that garbage Sanders v Warren drama is a new type of fuel that we require for heating our homes in winter.
OP
OP
Yes it is and I already explained how he should have handled it initial post you quoted. You are also assuming he didn't say what Warren says he did.
Concurrent desalination and power generation? I'll have to look into this for interest's sake. If efficient, that's two birds with one stone.
Those give me nightmares too! My last one had me being chased down a highway by nemesis from re3 lol. They're so vivid.
And had he done that, it would have ended his candidacy. It would have been taken as a tacit admission that he'd said something he clearly denies saying.
Which is why he needed to strongly deny it. What that implies about her is not his problem.
You're giving Bernie too much credit for the Justice Democrats, he may have inspired them but he had fuck all to do with leading them or getting them the logistical and media support their campaigns needed to win. Cenk Uygur had more to do with them winning than Bernie Sanders. The political group associated with Bernie, Our Revolution, did terribly and he had nothing to do with them on the ground, either. The strategy to get socialist politicians embedded all over the country has hit a huge barrier in that they're only able to achieve victories in safe blue seats and they still lose the majority of the time to moderates.
Young voters are great but they are a weakness when they are one of the main voting blocs since they are notoriously unreliable, as shown in 2016 and 2019. Of course this is a worldwide phenomena, not simply America. This is why calling this "political momentum" while ignoring he has huge issues appealing to older voters across all demographics isn't as impressive as presented.
Bernie's idea that he's going to force congress to buckle from pressure from activists is a fantasy, he's not demonstrated he has this ability ever. Why should I trust that he's going to make this miracle were he to be president when he can't beat Hillary Clinton in the primaries, and this force is nowhere to be seen in congress right now. Because we sure need them at the moment.
Bernie's not known for pushing legislation, that's more Warren's and Klob's wheelhouse, he's known for amendments in bills.
Last edited:
The bill Bernie DID pass is one that Trump keeps taking credit for and one which Bernie won't correct the record on because it's the VA choice plan, allowing for vets to use private providers in lieu of government ones.
You have one guess why he won't bring up this super popular bill that Trump keeps falsely claiming credit for.
You have one guess why he won't bring up this super popular bill that Trump keeps falsely claiming credit for.
Warren is a threat to the establishment and Wall Street so why did NYT endorsed her?
And Amy is Amy.
And Amy is Amy.
OP
OP
She can please progressives and rally other groups of Dems.
Remember that rumor about the Trump admin who got honeypotted then they did nothing about his security clearance? Welp:
Rumor inside NSC is that Peek 'had relations with Russian hookers and could not locate his government cell phone,' insider source tells me. https://t.co/kOpYcOCSlu
He's not even fired, he's on administrative leave lol
Rumor inside NSC is that Peek 'had relations with Russian hookers and could not locate his government cell phone,' insider source tells me. https://t.co/kOpYcOCSlu
He's not even fired, he's on administrative leave lol
Defeated by the russian government... With Facebook memes and hookers
Good Job America
Peek is a Princeton -> Harvard -> Johns Hopkins triple grad and former army intelligence, further proof that thinking with your dick can shut off all higher brain functions.
Topple a government using this one weird trick!
Topple a government using this one weird trick!
No it wouldn't have. "It was a misunderstanding and I apologize if she felt I said that but that was not my intention" would not have ended anything.
1. Because a lot, most really, people vote/endorse based on a nebulous and ever-changing set of criteria that don't boil down so simply into an "establishment or non-establishment" binary that lacks nuance.
2. Perhaps their reasoning is detailed further elsewhere, such as in writing or on a weekly TV show.
If it could work on a stable genius like Trump what chance did that poor federal employee have?
There, they're friends again. Because they're adults and colleagues.
This is way too on-brand for the Trump admin. Both under "the best people" and "Russian hookers." I can't believe this is coming out of the AP.
OP
OP
- Status