Which is all the more reason why it baffles me whenever people insist on having her be Biden's VP pick.Michigan's still in a rut from 09. Whitmer has a ton of work to repair shit there and it seems like it's gonna take a good amount of time.
Which is all the more reason why it baffles me whenever people insist on having her be Biden's VP pick.Michigan's still in a rut from 09. Whitmer has a ton of work to repair shit there and it seems like it's gonna take a good amount of time.
I reckon the new revelations about Tara Reade havent hit the mainstream
Edited a typo
On the flip side, the longer she stays the higher chance she has of getting in scandals and drama.Which is all the more reason why it baffles me whenever people insist on having her be Biden's VP pick.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bots-a...g-coronavirus-misinformation-researchers-say/
So fun times, looks like bot farms are back and are now trying to get Americans to ignore social distancing. Cool. Cool cool cool.
Provided she actually knows about the recent revelations, this would be true.
well outside of the Reade thing, she cites Margaret Thatcher as her role model.
Have there been any articles about how campaigning is going to look like in the fall?
It will be Biden giving interviews to CNN and MSNBC while Trump tweets, neither campaign has any infrastructure and neither needs any.
Recent example was Pompey getting blindsided by a local reporter and the mild furor surrounding itPoliticians like local interviews because they're more likely to give softball questions.
I think the Biden campaign is okay with that if it really comes down to it. I think Trump will still hold rallies though.It will be Biden giving interviews to CNN and MSNBC while Trump tweets, neither campaign has any infrastructure and neither needs any.
This is my concern though. Trump and his rallies dominating headlines. His supporters don't care and will flock to see him.I think the Biden campaign is okay with that if it really comes down to it. I think Trump will still hold rallies though.
He risks headlines like 'Ten people dies due to coronavirus exposure after attending Trump rally a few weeks ago' once the second wave is here. We already saw a taste of this when Jared Kushner's wife tested positive.
The Optics™️ is not gonna look good but it's not gonna stop him from doing the rallies. His base won't stop attending but the few middle ground voters (that still exist) and old will be paying attention. It will keep confirming to these people that Trump is out of touch when it comes to the pandemic response. It will also keep associating Trump's name with the dead victims.
Rallies will also increase the chances that Trump gets it. Knowing him, he will ignore doctor's orders to rest and we might see Trump's own version of the Hillary collapse.
"But are we willing to kill people? Are we willing to lay down our lives?" he asked. "We have to say, 'Yes.' We have to say, 'Yes.' Is that violence? Is that terrorism? No, it's not terrorism. I'm not trying to strike fear in people by saying, 'I'm going to kill you.' I'm gonna say, 'If you bring guns, I'm gonna bring guns. If you're armed with this, we're going to be armed with this.'"
I've seen enough eugenics-flavored talk from right wing pundits and writers, to suspect that the GOP believes the people who get sick enough to be hospitalized will be a minority of old people they can do without.This is where I see the Republican strategy--convince loyal GOP voters that coronavirus is over/not real/not that bad to juice turnout--has a major flaw.
Once the rallies start, there's a real chance their infection rates will grow too. if you're GOP you probably don't care if they get sick, but you do care if they are too sick to vote.
To be fair, that's how people responded when Moore said it in 2016 too.Biden may "lack" enthusiasm but Dems are motivated as fuck to beat Trump.
To be fair, that's how people responded when Moore said it in 2016 too.
Moore was not "right", he did not see Trump's one possible path to victory nor could make the call on the Comey memo. He has had his ear to the ground in those areas over the years and could tell you that people "would" vote for him rather than "will" vote, but that's not the same thing as making a prescient call. He got too much credit for this, and like so many others he doesn't seem to acknowledge the motivation of people that got Biden back into the race. Reading the quotes, he still thinks Biden may not be the nominee.
What the hell are you talking about? I swear some of you have the memory of a gold fish.
5 Reasons Why Trump Will Win - Michael Moore (July 25th, 2016)
Oh please, I was around and aware of this. And this. https://michaelmoore.com/makesuretrumploses/Come on, now.
They didn't vote for Trump as a political joke from a sense of humor or because "they could". He won the primary because it's what the party really wanted, not because Trump is tough. They voted for Trump because they aligned and bought in the rhetoric from the start. Even today with Clinton long out of the picture, they are willing to risk their businesses, accept their own layoffs, accept deportation of spouses and other family members, and now risk their own health and healthcare not to say "never Clinton", but "Trump".
Clinton wasn't merely unpopular on her own. Decades of public messaging, and a little help from Russia, and at the end Comey was enough to open that one path. We've been through this analysis so many times before.
Further, the enthusiasm for Sanders didn't translate enough in 2016, and went even less far in 2020. From time to time it makes you think what might have been, of course, but there's no reason to hold onto an alternate reality like Moore is. There will be some sort of convention resolution, if not in-person, with Biden as the nominee.
I've known about Trump for decades, living in the Greater NYC area. He has operated consistently the whole time. There was nothing new to know about him except his most recent dealings and associates, yet people continue to give him too much credit for everything.
Your original post claimed Moore shouldn't be congratulated for addressing potential "would' voters and not "will" voters. He made a definitive statement in an Oped (and a follow up article that you are provided only reconfirms his stance "do not think for a second this election is over or in the bag") that Trump would win and bet on it. Don't discredit the guy, he was one of the few people who raised the flags.
I'm fully aware (as we all are) of the other variables at play that created a perfect storm in 2016, none of which could have been foreseen. But don't knock the guy from addressing key (and pretty damn obvious) variables that even Hillary's camp was overlooking.
I've also known about Moore for decades and followed his career with great interest. I'm not discrediting him, I just said he's didn't quite make the call, and gives Trump too much credit.
If you want to keep telling me what to not to say about Moore, that's fine. But maybe next time it can be done without making unqualified comments about my memory. It may indeed go the way of the goldfish at some point, but we're not there yet.
Where in CA?California is announcing plans to open gyms in a couple days? What all changed in the past 2 weeks? Lol
I phrased my post wrong but they're announcing gym reopening plans in a couple days that should take place in June
I don't know, I'm actually in the camp of people who don't feel Trump is given enough credit for some of the political plays he has pulled off. He has managed to convince a large portion of the US population that fascism, cult mentality, and dictatorship tactics are beneficial to our nation as a whole all within 5 years. That's incredibly impressive regardless of what GOP tentacles have helped facilitate the narrative and strategic moves.
I don't know, I'm actually in the camp of people who don't feel Trump is given enough credit for some of the political plays he has pulled off. He has managed to convince a large portion of the US population that fascism, cult mentality, and dictatorship tactics are beneficial to our nation as a whole all within 5 years. That's incredibly impressive regardless of what GOP tentacles have helped facilitate the narrative and strategic moves.
A lot of his tactics are juvenile but incredibly effective. Look at how long the Hunter Biden story stayed in the news for and then how long Tara Reade will continue for an then I'm sure his role in Russia/Flynn investigation. It's all conspiracy nonsense further fueled by Fox News propaganda and mouth pieces within the GOP umbrella, but he's the one creating those talking points and creating a "fall in line" environment.
Meanwhile for the better part of 10 years Democrats can't seem to stay consistent on one damn issue.
The whole problem with this is seen in 2018 and now-he's hollowed out the GOP and now they face huge demographic struggles. All the growth in Texas, Georgia, and the Sun Belt don't help if they are all concentrated in the inner ring burbs.
I think Jeb! or Rubio would have executed more or less on that outreach plan. However, Trump somehow bungled into the plans for the GOP death star, found the exhaust vent in the primaries, and used it to blow the entire party up.
That story about Junkyard Jared getting involved in the party platform and trying to turn it into a set of simple principles makes sense-if you hang out with your business friends too much, that's what you're going to cargo cult. It's terrible politics though, and turns bright specific things in your platform that people can latch onto into mushy, mealy messes. It also has zero appeal outside of the party base, which is already 85% on board anyway.
Just dumb, but that's Jared.