Or, you could be against it because any justice system is imperfect, and it's too risky to execute people, even those who deserve it.
Wow
Or, you could be against it because any justice system is imperfect, and it's too risky to execute people, even those who deserve it.
Or, you could be against it because any justice system is imperfect, and it's too risky to execute people, even those who deserve it.
Because it's not a natural or essential right. They don't need the entire gamut of citizens rights to recover. By your logic imprisonment at all is arbitrary and counterproductive? And yet they've stolen the natural and essential rights of others.
Eh, I'm of two minds about it. Do you not agree with crime and punishment? Not the implementation here in the U.S. of course, but the concept?Which is why the system being built on being punitive is wrong. Criminal justice should be rehabilitative, not based on punitive and draconian ideals of punishment and suffering.
Yet, I assume you don't support capital punishment, and if you don't, then there's a reason for that. 'Eye for an eye' makes people feel better too; you could even say that it fosters a sense of justice, but it is wrong, barbaric, and keeps us lagging behind most other major democratic societies around the world.
Being better than literally just murdering people in retaliation is not any form of standard I'd consider to be morally upright and justified. "Paying your debt to society" is not meant to just be a bunch of rules we enforce on felons to make us feel better, that's a massive reason why our justice system is broken in the first place. Because we shovel them off into a cage to be out of our sight as we revel in their suffering and torment. "Justice" is supposed to be reformative, and even if we deny people permanent parole (which I also find wrong given how less than 5% of all felony convictions even get a trial) that's no excuse to deny them the right to have their voice heard for their own conditions.
If they are still people they still have the basic right to be heard, and if not then they aren't people.
Just chiming in to say I generally don't believe in punitive justice. A grace period for bereavement, sure, but otherwise it's a waste of time.
I do not view them as subhuman. But I do view people who repeatedly make the choice to harm other people as having made it very clear who they are. And when that's clear, it's up to society to make it so they can't hurt other people anymore. The reason you have problems with sex offender colonies under bridges? Largely exist because we released them back out into society.Look, I will say this with as much empathy as I can.
You view an entire sub-class of people as subhuman because of a personal tragedy that befell you, and I am sorry for what happened.
But it's an absolute absurdity to think that people like Dylan Roof and the Boston Bombers are the norm of violent felonies. These are not animals, they are human beings who we force into slavery and abuse and torment every moment of every day of the remainder of their lives. And you are clearly incapable, as is evident in every single thread about the justice system, of dealing with the fact that there is not some ravening hoard of rapists, murderers, and thieves roaming around every corner.
99.9% of humanity are not incontrovertible, unfixable, blatant bald faced monsters who lack empathy or the capacity for goodness. You can't create a justice system centered around the outliers of the monsters that haunt you.
It's more about options for taking care of the problem. I dont have a moral issue with the death penalty, but it comes with a "1 innocent life isn't worth 999 guilty ones" problem, and so going for the safer option is preferable.
I don't think dems/independents are gonna sit at home or vote for Trump on election day because Bernie supports prisoners' right to vote. Sorry. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
And it is people who they have hurt and threaten to hurt again. They are not more important than the people they have victimized and threaten to victimize again."Options for taking care of the problem".
These are people, Kirblar.
So it's okay to murder them.And it is people who they have hurt and threaten to hurt again. They are not more important than the people they have victimized and threaten to victimize again.
If you're an omnipotent god-king, yes. We shouldn't be doing that, because we're not omnipotent god-kings and can't tell the difference between a serial killer and the guy falsely set up as one by corrupt police. And so the risk isn't worth it when we have the ability to imprison them for the rest of their lives.
They never should've made Kirby so angry for the American release.
If you're an omnipotent god-king, yes. We shouldn't be doing that, because we're not omnipotent god-kings and can't tell the difference between a serial killer and the guy falsely set up as one by corrupt police. And so the risk isn't worth it when we have the ability to imprison them for the rest of their lives.
Here's a source on that.I can't verify the source of the information (reddit comment), but supposedly white papers for Mayor Pete are coming out in early May.
e: also if Biden isn't announcing this week, give me that Monmouth poll tomorrow please
That the right for felons to vote is even up for debate is pretty wild. Those percentages of support/oppose on the last page are staggering, how does such an immoral view in the general electorate come about?
You missed that time when the rich using economic violence on the poor to displace them is fine if it's a net gain to societyArabs can't dance, justifying warcrimes in Korea, his general view on the working class and now this nonsense. How utterly despicable.
What's this?Arabs can't dance, justifying warcrimes in Korea, his general view on the working class and now this nonsense. How utterly despicable.
If I were an omnipotent god-king I'd go back in time to eradicate evil from the world and make all life inherently benevolent and altruistic.
_____________________________________________________________
Class of 2020 y'all!
If I were an omnipotent god-king I'd go back in time to eradicate evil from the world and make all life inherently benevolent and altruistic.
_____________________________________________________________
Class of 2020 y'all!
"Options for taking care of the problem".
These are people, Kirblar. People who did an awful thing, or awful things, but people.
To murder them in retaliation for doing that awful thing, is wrong.
An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind etc.I don't really agree with this. I am anti-death penalty because there is no fool-proof way of preventing innocent deaths, but intentionally depriving someone else of their life is worthy, morally, of being met with the same fate, unless you are mentally ill and were unable to discern the difference between right and wrong at the time.
If you're an omnipotent god-king, yes. We shouldn't be doing that, because we're not omnipotent god-kings and can't tell the difference between a serial killer and the guy falsely set up as one by corrupt police. And so the risk isn't worth it when we have the ability to imprison them for the rest of their lives.
References to Kirblar's past bans.
We should treat them better than how they treat their victims. We don't do the Hammurabi thing and go tit for tat; that is just vengeance masquerading as justice.I don't really agree with this. I am anti-death penalty because there is no fool-proof way of preventing innocent deaths, but intentionally depriving someone else of their life is worthy, morally, of being met with the same fate, unless you are mentally ill and were unable to discern the difference between right and wrong at the time.
The Clintons Had Slaves
Contrary to popular understanding, the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution did not prohibit slavery. The text makes it clear:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
The nifty little loophole of that word "except" means that slavery isn't actually banned outright; someone simply has to be convicted of a crime in order to be enslaved.
Today, forced labor among African Americans persists; in Louisiana, for example, felons are sentenced to "hard labor" as well as prison time, and inmates at the infamous Angola prison still pick cotton at gunpoint.
The prison labor system in the United States has long been an unacknowledged scandal. It's quite plainly a form of slavery. The Thirteenth Amendment even admits as much: it doesn't say that when you're forced to work for being convicted of a crime, that isn't slavery. It says that slavery is legal if it is imposed as part of a conviction for a crime.
But two possibly unexpected beneficiaries of the contemporary prison slavery system were none other than Bill and Hillary Clinton, who during their time at the Arkansas governor's mansion in the 1980's used inmates to perform various household tasks in order to "keep costs down." Hillary Clinton wrote of the practice openly and without any apparent sense of moral conflict.
Clinton was, however, generous enough to allow inmates from Arkansas prisons to work as unpaid servants in the Governor's Mansion. In It Takes a Village, Hillary Clinton writes that the residence was staffed with "African-American men in their thirties," since "using prison labor at the governor's mansion was a longstanding tradition, which kept down costs." It is unclear just how longstanding the tradition of having chained black laborers brought to work as maids and gardeners had been.
But one has no doubt that as the white residents of a mansion staffed with unpaid blacks, the Clintons were continuing a certain historic Southern practice. (Hillary Clinton did note, however, that she and Bill were sure not to show undue lenience to the sla…servants, writing that "[w]e enforced rules strictly and sent back to prison any inmate who broke a rule."
The Clintons' use of prison labor was only one small part of a long and horrifying record. Both Clintons, but especially Bill, have consistently manipulated black political interests while showing complete disregard for the humanity of African Americans.
This stretches from Hillary's perpetuation of a hideous racist myth about a wave of hyper-violent "superpredators" to Bill's politically-motivated execution of a mentally disturbed black inmate. (I know it's a crass plug, but there really is far more on this, with a lot of sources, in Superpredator.)
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/06/the-clintons-had-slaves
California Is Running Out of Inmates to Fight Its Fires
More than 3,700 men and women—and even some juvenile offenders—now voluntarily serve on the force. Collectively, they make up roughly a third of the state's wildfire-fighting personnel, and work an average of 10 million hours each year responding to fires and other emergencies and handling community-service projects like park maintenance, reforestation, and fire and flood protection.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...l-inmates-fight-californias-wildfires/547628/
"Options for taking care of the problem".
These are people, Kirblar. People who did an awful thing, or awful things, but people.
To murder them in retaliation for doing that awful thing, is wrong.
Yup. Their tweet last week teasing this poll was making it seem like something more interesting was going on up top. Not everyone but Pete losing percentages. Lol.So Biden stays stable and Pete gets votes from all the others.
You stared into the abyss too long
References to Kirblar's past bans.
We should treat them better than how they treat their victims. We don't do the Hammurabi thing and go tit for tat; that is just vengeance masquerading as justice.
Also, felon disenfranchisement is entirely racist.
If we do forgive student loan debt, it would be the biggest upper-middle class handout I've ever seen. I'm solidly against this policy, and if it ever becomes mainstream among Democrats I genuinely don't know who I'm going to vote for. Can we have a "smart, sensible policy" party please?
FYI, I'm still 100% in support of forgiving loans for individuals who are incapable of paying it back, before people start dogpiling on me. Just not most middle-class folks.
We can do both. And fixing felon disenfranchisement is a part of criminal justice reform.I agree that a disproportionate amount of African Americans are in prison and some of them are definitely for racist reasons.
The solution is not to allow murderers to vote as collateral damage to correct this injustice, the solution is actual criminal justice reform to make sure the people who are in prison for bogus crimes like smoking a joint while black aren't in prison to begin with.
Solve the root cause.