Hmm 13 TF is 8% better than 12
Klee vindicated?
Next gen gonna be lit
Wouldn't be much of a discussion thread without the discussion, and discussions usually lead to disagreements. Just enjoy the ride.i don't know why people here fight
just wait and let the official news proves you right or wrong.
this endless fight will not works for both
Hmm 13 TF is 8% better than 12
Klee vindicated?
Next gen gonna be lit
You can't compare with stadia as it uses older tech. 9.2 ps5 would outperform it noticeably. Hell im not sure stadia is even living up to its 10.7 claim as it underperforms compared to an equivalent pc. Wether that's due to overhead or the beta nature of the service who knows.
Won't be lit for the xbox guys who have an 8% weaker system. :'(
Won't be lit for the xbox guys who have an 8% weaker system. :'(
Wouldn't be much of a discussion thread without the discussion, and discussions usually lead to disagreements. Just enjoy the ride.
How else would they hope to get noticed in Japan? :)
No, they still lit...and I think MS may be lowballing to have a final clock surprise
Reality is that both machines will be beastly and really close
"Fortunately, we have a product for people who can't afford to pay $499, it's called the Xbox Series S"Lockhart is gonna be interesting since MS is all about them flops now. It has less tittyflops despite performing on par (and better than due to new techniques) with the One X. But because they chose to tout the floppage of the SX, they can't do the same of the SS. Will be interesting to see how they handle the narrative
18.8 tutti-frutti flopsBeen at work all day. What's the Tflop count looking like today?
Been at work all day. What's the Tflop count looking like today?
You might be joking.....but that rumor about Sony trying you expand the platform.
Just curious. How do you calculate TFs?It ain't going to be 56 CUs at 2 Ghz. Not for a reasonable price.
Much more likely to be 54 CUs at 1.8 Ghz (i.e., 12.44 TFs). 3 SEs with 18 CUs each makes hardware-based bc feasible as well (just disable 1 SE).
That would make sense as well because insiders were saying that there was practically no difference in raw power between the 2 consoles.
Klee has been vindicated if certain...Hmm 13 TF is 8% better than 12
Klee vindicated?
Next gen gonna be lit
54 CUs*64 Streaming Processors per CU*2 Operations Per Streaming Processor per Cycle*1.8 Ghz*0.001 flops to teraflops units adjustment =12.44 TFs
On this architecture:
CU_COUNT * 128 * CLOCK_SPEED
I'm going to make a prediction. If and that's a big IF, PS5 does indeed turn out to be more powerful than XSX, I can see some already latching onto "Sony must be using RDNA1 figures while XSX is RDNA2, so Sony is misleading consumers!". Then we get into the whole architectural efficiency arguments again. Hoo, boy, that oughta be fun
It don't matter it performers better when it comes to marketing 9.2 is less than 10.7 .
Numbers are the easiest thing for the mass market to understand .
This giving flash back to when people thought MS or Jason was talking about something other than hard numbers
They are going to be near identical raw powerwise...I think it will come down to customizations for specific goals they are trying to achieve (i.e., Sony with VR; MS with high FPS and cloud-based distributed computing)I hope the machines are nearly identical.
Same TFs, same clock speeds, same RAM. The less we hear about the power difference between the consoles, the better.
The difference between xbox one and xbox one s.Couldn't read the forum today. What's that 8% people are mentioning?
Benji's sources must have had white papers.. so did Klee. While the dev kit revions didn't always match that, devs knew, much like the 1.84TF confirmation in 2012 that Sony were targeting thise specs.We're getting a 13TF RDNA2 PS5 aren't we?
Benji was right. Colbert 's 8 TF GCN prediction looking to grossly underestimate next gen Lol
Well, it is the circle of life.We had a individuals saying the XSX was GCN numbers. So they, people will be discounting the PS5 numbers!
The difference between xbox one and xbox one s.
Which Klee approximated for the difference between ps5 and xsx.
We did get a bunch of new stuff. Mainly confirmation of rdna2 for both ps5 and xsx.Cool. Thanks.
I thought they were talking about some new confirmed stuff. lol
We did get a bunch of new stuff. Mainly confirmation of rdna2 for both ps5 and xsx.
And rdna2 being a 50% improvement on performance per watt.
Who is this and why are you posting it? Your general behavior in this thread is to make driveby posts and subtly platform war. Guess I'll hit the report button again.
Someone who makes you wish you were still getting your next gen news from a cat with a substance abuse problem.
Proven has proved that they cannot be subtle.Who is this and why are you posting it? Your general behavior in this thread is to make driveby posts and subtly platform war. Guess I'll hit the report button again.
Thats what I'd like to know..
I see... but...are we assuming Series X and PS5 uses the same GPU but at varying clockspeed?13 TF comes from Benji last year. He leaked it from a source, but later took the tweet down because it was so high he didn't believe it
13 TF being 8% better than 12 is also consistent with Klee saying PS5 was slightly more powerful and that MS revealing 12 TF didn't change anything
RDNA 2 for PS5.This thread needs Lionel Mandrake style summaries at the end of every day so people can figure out if anything actually happened without reading 20 pages of... whatever.
Thanks!RDNA 2 for PS5.
RDNA 2 has a 50% increase performance per watt compared to RDNA.
There ya go.
I see... but...are we assuming Series X and PS5 uses the same GPU but at varying clockspeed?
Could be 54 CU at 1.89ghz or so. 🤔13 TF comes from Benji last year. He leaked it from a source, but later took the tweet down because it was so high he didn't believe it
13 TF being 8% better than 12 is also consistent with Klee saying PS5 was slightly more powerful and that MS revealing 12 TF didn't change anything
They're both custom gpus. It's very likely that Xbox landed at 56 CU. So they could still up the clock and beat PS5 if that ends up being 54 CU like some of us think.I see... but...are we assuming Series X and PS5 uses the same GPU but at varying clockspeed?
I see. Well.. let the 8TF nonsense die now... and quite frankly.. I'm hoping admin pays close attention to those that want to go back to saying RDNA1... or day I say it... Vega CGN again.Well, we know for a fact both are on RDNA2 and 12-14TF doesn't sound all that ridiculous now that AMD revealed 50% energy efficiency gains with RDNA2
CUs and clocks could vary for both, but they will end up very close
Could be 54 CU at 1.89ghz or so. 🤔
They're both custom gpus. It's very likely that Xbox landed at 56 CU. So they could still up the clock and beat PS5 if that ends up being 54 CU like some of us think.
I hope the machines are nearly identical.
Same TFs, same clock speeds, same RAM. The less we hear about the power difference between the consoles, the better.
From the 46th minute. They talked about how they put their simulation to test chips. A lot of what he said reminded me of what I've seen from the Github leak.